Ah, now it’s the people becoming stupid? Sheesh.Zeisner wrote: Mon Feb 02, 2026 2:29 pmNo, this might only be evidence for people getting worse at differentiating real from artificial, bots replacing human listeners or both combined. I'm also not playing your stupid reverse Sealioning troll game ("Look for you own proof" - "I did, that's why I think AI sucks" - "You didn't look hard enough"). So yeah, all you can provide is bogus arguments, just like the blockchain fanatics and cryptobros, it's always the same pattern. By the way, does your DAW have blockchain? No? Are you stupid?Tiles wrote: Fri Jan 30, 2026 7:08 am I pointed you to the millions of daily uploads on Spotify, documented by an article. That’s evidence of scale, not a claim that hinges on cherry-picked examples. That alone demonstrates that AI has already reached professional-level adoption.
You are stacking speculation on top of speculation and then treating it as a conclusion. “People getting worse”, “bots replacing listeners”, or “both combined” are assumptions, not evidence, and they conveniently shield your position from any counterexample. If every outcome can be dismissed as manipulation or incompetence, you are no longer arguing, you are just defending a belief.
Calling this “reverse sealioning” does not make it so. I am not asking you to prove a universal negative. I am pointing out that you dismiss observable market outcomes without offering a coherent alternative explanation that can actually be examined or falsified.
I take the opportunity here to correct myself. Since for me facts matters. It's not millions of uploads per week to Spotify but Suno. I have misread the article. Well, the value is nevertheless not completely wrong, Spotify has removed 75 million tracks last year ...
The fact itself remains. AI has a significant impact at the market.
https://www.musicful.ai/news/ai-music-statistics/
https://zipdo.co/ai-in-the-music-industry-statistics/
https://seosandwitch.com/ai-in-music-stats/
https://www.musicindustrywatch.com/arti ... 36-5-share
https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/ ... -predicts/
https://www.simplebeen.com/ai-music-statistics/
https://www.intelevoresearch.com/report ... ic-market/
https://www.theguardian.com/music/2025/ ... fake-music
https://www.musicradar.com/music-tech/i ... t-ai-music
https://www.reuters.com/business/media- ... 026-01-29/
https://www.musicradar.com/music-indust ... single-day
Back to your trolling. The blockchain comparison is telling, because it replaces analysis with guilt by association. Different technologies, different contexts, different evidence, flattened into one emotional shortcut. That may feel persuasive, but it does not strengthen the argument.
And ending with “are you stupid?” is not a mic drop. It is a signal that the discussion has run out of substance. If your position were as solid as you suggest, it would not need that kind of punctuation. Claiming exclusive insight while dismissing all facts and counterevidence is not an argument either. Even worse. The facts do not support any of your claims.
