DAWbench

Configure and optimize you computer for Audio.
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

vignesh.vijay wrote: Wed Dec 17, 2025 6:58 pmThe bigger question. I have latency problems at 256 buffer size. The latency on VST instruments- Is that from my audio interface or is it my computer? Or is it because of the midi-usb cable i use?
5.5ms / 128 Buffer @48kHz is about what you can expect from a modern class compliant USB audio device. So your audio device is working fine and any latency problems are not related to it. Going to lower buffers (64 or 32 if available), to shave 1-2ms off, is not worth the CPU hit if the main use case is for virtual instruments. Switching to a PCIe / Thunderbolt device will, likewise, not gain much - though certain drivers (like RME) might perform better under heavy CPU load on Windows (On Mac it doesn’t matter the same).

If you’re experiencing significant latency then the source is likely to be the plugin chain. I remember you asking about this before. Many plugins are far from zero latency, and (generally) you cannot chain a bunch of FX and expect there not to be a noticeable delay if you aren’t making sure those effects are zero latency.

MIDI input issues (whether direct or via USB) are usually more about jitter and event timestamps (AKA Why does what I record sound worse, timing wise, than what I actually played) For Cubase, ASIO Guard will also add latency to any non-record enabled tracks, in order to attempt to better balance CPU usage. Mostly you want this enabled.

Post

Plug-ins with look-ahead will increase the latency
https://share.google/aimode/X2lSRC24mNQasCKU0

Post

PCAudioLabs Pro Audio CPU Benchmarks & Comparisons
https://pcaudiolabs.com/pcaudiolabs-pro ... mparisons/

Post

Pictus wrote: Thu Jan 29, 2026 10:27 pm PCAudioLabs Pro Audio CPU Benchmarks & Comparisons
https://pcaudiolabs.com/pcaudiolabs-pro ... mparisons/
do we have something like this for audio interfaces as well?

Post

vignesh.vijay wrote: Sat Jan 31, 2026 2:45 pm do we have something like this for audio interfaces as well?
Yes.
https://dawbench.substack.com/p/audio-i ... erformance

Post

Interesting

Post

Intel’s Ultra “Plus” Range Refresh
https://www.scanproaudio.info/2026/04/1 ... e-refresh/
Image
Image
Image

Post

Does Intel still have the blue screen and crash issues?

Post

vignesh.vijay wrote: Sat Apr 18, 2026 12:53 pm Does Intel still have the blue screen and crash issues?
I don't know, maybe you're talking about when Arrow Lake was new?
https://overclock3d.net/news/cpu_mainbo ... re-coming/
https://www.orangehardwares.com/blogs/g ... ternatives

Post

Am I reading this graph correctly that, agnostic of Intel and AMD, Reaper is capable of running vastly more plugin instances than both Cubase and Studio One? How is this possible? Can the choice of sequencer really make such an enormous difference on the potential scale of a project? I feel like I must be missing something...
Last edited by MaxC on Sat Jun 06, 2026 6:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post

MaxC wrote: Sat Jun 06, 2026 2:24 pm Am I reading this graph correctly that, agnostic of Intel and AMD, Reaper is capable of running vastly more plugin instances than both Cubase and Studio One? How is this possible?
It depends on the quality of the staff/programmers.
Can a chef at a prestigious 5-star restaurant prepare a better lunch than one made by a McDonald's employee?
Can the choice of sequence really make such an enormous difference on the potential scale of a project? I feel like I must be missing something...
The way you route and the type of plugins you use will also make all the difference.
The audio interface type/driver and how Windows is set.
I can not help you with DAW stuff, but with the Windows.

Post

Pictus can you comment on my two questions below.

1. My question to Pictus is do older-generation CPUs exhibit the same pronounced scaling limitations that this chart suggests are affecting Cubase performance on modern CPUs? I haven't seen these performance discrepancies in any earlier DAWBENCH reports with older CPUs. (AM4 and dual socket XEON E5 V4 cpus in my case)

2. Pictus, perhaps those deficits are present and this new testing template exposes them across all CPUs? Can you comment?


MaxC wrote: Sat Jun 06, 2026 2:24 pm
Am I reading this graph correctly that, agnostic of Intel and AMD, Reaper is capable of running vastly more plugin instances than both Cubase and Studio One? How is this possible? Can the choice of sequence really make such an enormous difference on the potential scale of a project? I feel like I must be missing something...

Post

Scotty wrote: Sat Jun 06, 2026 4:09 pm Pictus can you comment on my two questions below.
1 - I'm sorry, but I'm not the right person to help you with DAW issues.
Ask at https://gearspace.com/board/music-compu ... st17621667

2 - DAWbench is evolving to better represent real-world scenarios.

Post Reply

Return to “Computer Setup and System Configuration”