Flangers and phasers
- KVRAF
- 2258 posts since 25 Jun, 2008 from Montreal, Canada
To be fair to jamcat I think sometime he gives great suggestions, but sometime... maybe he's an alcoholic? 
- KVRAF
- 7664 posts since 2 Sep, 2019
You totally dodged answering the question, Ivan. The reason why is pretty obvious. We find ourselves in an odd period where of course all developers are leveraging AI, because they would be stupid not to, but they're unwilling to admit to it. So that's where we are now. But if you didn't have extensive experience with using AI in your coding work, you certainly wouldn't be attacking someone else's supposed lack of experience in using AI for coding tasks, since if you did, you would literally be exhibiting your own "Dunning-Kruger Effect."
The difference here, is I'm not taking pot-shots from behind an appeal to authority logical fallacy. I don't talk about what I do. But I don't have to. I can just point to some pretty well-established trends. 5 years ago, computer programming was the fastest growing sector in the market. "Experts" were saying there weren't enough programmers to fill all of the job openings, and that was only going to accelerate. Today, the programming job market has imploded. Not only are there no job openings, but programmers are being laid off en masse. If AI can't and isn't doing all of the things that I say it can and is doing, then why are all of the human coders being replaced by AI? Is it because the tech industry is shifting all of its resources to a technology that doesn't work? Of course not.
The difference here, is I'm not taking pot-shots from behind an appeal to authority logical fallacy. I don't talk about what I do. But I don't have to. I can just point to some pretty well-established trends. 5 years ago, computer programming was the fastest growing sector in the market. "Experts" were saying there weren't enough programmers to fill all of the job openings, and that was only going to accelerate. Today, the programming job market has imploded. Not only are there no job openings, but programmers are being laid off en masse. If AI can't and isn't doing all of the things that I say it can and is doing, then why are all of the human coders being replaced by AI? Is it because the tech industry is shifting all of its resources to a technology that doesn't work? Of course not.
THIS MUSIC HAS BEEN MIXED TO BE PLAYED LOUD SO TURN IT UP
-
- KVRist
- 394 posts since 18 May, 2020
Coding jobs are trending up, you vibe poster, you.
REAPER + Davinci Resolve Pro on Manjaro KDE. Neve 88m. Focusrite 18i20 2nd gen. Neumann NDH30 headphones. Mics: Telefunken TF39, AT4050, Miktek C7e, EV RE-15. VSTs: u-he Hive 2, F'em, Renoise Redux, Apisonic Speedrum 2.
-
simon.a.billington simon.a.billington https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=341278
- KVRAF
- 2587 posts since 12 Nov, 2014
Yep, that'll be it. We're only about 6 months out on macOS 27 too.jamcat wrote: Mon May 11, 2026 9:37 amHere is the official word from Apple:simon.a.billington wrote: Mon May 11, 2026 5:20 am I certainly think that the case is pretty strong that Intel/Rosetta will be dropped with the next macOS 27 which will most likely be launched around September.
“Rosetta was designed to make the transition to Apple silicon easier, and we plan to make it available for the next two major macOS releases – through macOS 27 – as a general-purpose tool for Intel apps to help developers complete the migration of their apps. Beyond this timeframe, we will keep a subset of Rosetta functionality aimed at supporting older unmaintained gaming titles, that rely on Intel-based frameworks.”
So yes, Rosetta2 will still be supported in the next version, macOS 27, but will not be supported any longer starting with the version after next, macOS 28. So the Rosetta sunset is two versions away still.
When they first released the M-Class chips using a different architecture than Intel that was when the writing was on the wall. They're not going to maintain both sets of codes indefinitely, especially a progressive company like Apple.
It would weigh them down to much and prevent them from trying new things. As it is, those Intel chips didn't even have Machine Learning capabilities for one. or hardware HVEC encoding/decoding.
Anyway, the point is, "the end is high". Well for Intel support anyway.
This is the time you should be shying away anything that still requires Rosetta. The devs have had over 5 years to get their s&*t together, and if they haven't done so already, it most likely will never happen. Just like all those minor developer plugins that never made it from VST2 to VST3.
Making this relevant, It would be wise to make sure any new flanger/phaser doesnt require Rosetta to run. At least on the Mac side.
- KVRAF
- 7664 posts since 2 Sep, 2019
And then another year from there until macOS 28 and the demise of Rosetta2. So just 18 months from now. Maybe as little as 16 months.simon.a.billington wrote: Tue May 12, 2026 11:38 pm Yep, that'll be it. We're only about 6 months out on macOS 27 too.
THIS MUSIC HAS BEEN MIXED TO BE PLAYED LOUD SO TURN IT UP
- Beware the Quoth
- 35432 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
You totally dodged answering the questions, jamcat. The reason why is pretty obvious.jamcat wrote: Tue May 12, 2026 8:37 pm You totally dodged answering the question, Ivan. The reason why is pretty obvious.
Yes, you just make proclomations as though you were an authority, taking pot-shots from behind proof by assertion logical fallacies.The difference here, is I'm not taking pot-shots from behind an appeal to authority logical fallacy.
Have you got any experience as a programmer whatsoever? Because you definitely repeatedly assert about programming and programmers without ever having backed up with any first-hand evidence or concrete references.I don't talk about what I do.
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
- Beware the Quoth
- 35432 posts since 4 Sep, 2001 from R'lyeh Oceanic Amusement Park and Funfair
publically-available audio plugin or host software development in a high-level programming language?
An idiot on Set Theory:
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
"In some cases there is an object called red that contains everything that is red. In much the same way a pot is a plate."
-
simon.a.billington simon.a.billington https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=341278
- KVRAF
- 2587 posts since 12 Nov, 2014
Yep. That is why I highly advocate moving away from relying on Intel/Rosetta. We have the time now, make that transition.jamcat wrote: Wed May 13, 2026 3:47 amAnd then another year from there until macOS 28 and the demise of Rosetta2. So just 18 months from now. Maybe as little as 16 months.simon.a.billington wrote: Tue May 12, 2026 11:38 pm Yep, that'll be it. We're only about 6 months out on macOS 27 too.
-
- KVRist
- 250 posts since 7 Oct, 2012
Just to add a few and follow the thread
https://niviem.net/products/klang-8008/
https://niviem.net/products/phase-one/
https://www.cutclassic.com/high-flyer/
https://audiopunks.com/plugins/buenos-multi-fx/
https://www.nembriniaudio.com/collectio ... r-wha-vibe
https://sixthsample.com/aurbit/
https://eftilo.com/plugins/cratere/
https://www.wamplerpedals.com/products/ ... rm-plugin/
https://niviem.net/products/klang-8008/
https://niviem.net/products/phase-one/
https://www.cutclassic.com/high-flyer/
https://audiopunks.com/plugins/buenos-multi-fx/
https://www.nembriniaudio.com/collectio ... r-wha-vibe
https://sixthsample.com/aurbit/
https://eftilo.com/plugins/cratere/
https://www.wamplerpedals.com/products/ ... rm-plugin/
