any singer here who’d like to sing on a song inspired by thom yorke’s (radiohead) solo style?

[Zeisner]

There are more people than you might think who would like to ignore ai music.

Or the opposite. Some people actually prefer AI music.

[wagtunes]

It you use a Sonible plugin only on one track, it is an ai production, so add the information: one ai plugin Sonible was used.

You didn't read it, cuz you give a f@@@ about musicianship, that's music history and I am sure you never ever heard these facts about one of these greatest true human artists ever .
Bach, Chopin, Prince!

People like you are responsible for the complete downfall of music.
1. Pro Tools
2. The Internet
3. AI and people using ai

Then why don't you add the information to every song you post that you used AI?! .
There are more people than you might think who would like to ignore ai music.

You know absolutely NOTHING about me or my musical background or history. My mother was a concert pianist and opera singer. She taught singing and piano for over 60 years. I am classically trained. I have a degree in music.

You know what all of that got me? 44 years of frustration trying to make it in the music business. Then I finally caught a break and now, with AI vocals so that people don't have to listen to my wretched voice, I am now getting recognition that years ago I could have only dreamed of.

So you can take your holier than thou BS and shove it. I couldn't give 2 shits what you think.

Trust me, popular music died long before AI or I ever got to it.

[DCrown]

Having a music degree is not a ticket to success in music business ! Madonna, Prince and many more had no music degree and succeeded.
yes the fall of music started with the release of Pro Tools in 1990ies, that's no secret, ai just makes it even worse.
I surrender and kindly ask you to add info.
Everyone can hear you use ai on vocals, it just doesn't sound good. You underestimate the importance of vocals in a song by comparing it to sample instruments that you have to know to play on keys or pads. You can use Modo Bass to play bass, but if you have no clue how a real bass is played it will sound terrible, same with saxophone vsti etc. Using pre-made loops and just adding it on a track, is another topic, I am not a fan of it, it was primarly used for HipHop and HipHop is a sad example, too, especially when you analyse the lyrics. They made some cool drums and tunes sometimes, but a lot of lyrics and productions getting very repetetive and similar didn't contribute to an upgrade of music unfortunately.
I just want to know before I listen to a track if ai was used and I am not interested in wasting my time on it - and the most important thing:

I am not the only one!

[wagtunes]

Having a music degree is not a ticket to success in music business ! Madonna, Prince and many more had no music degree and succeeded.
yes the fall of music started with the release of Pro Tools in 1990ies, that's no secret, ai just makes it even worse.
I surrender and kindly ask you to add info.
Everyone can hear you use ai on vocals, it just doesn't sound good. You underestimate the importance of vocals in a song by comparing it to sample instruments that you have to know to play on keys or pads. You can use Modo Bass to play bass, but if you have no clue how a real bass is played it will sound terrible, same with saxophone vsti etc. Using pre-made loops and just adding it on a track, is another topic, I am not a fan of it, it was primarly used for HipHop and HipHop is a sad example, too, especially when you analyse the lyrics. They made some cool drums and tunes sometimes, but a lot of lyrics and productions getting very repetetive and similar didn't contribute to an upgrade of music unfortunately.
I just want to know before I listen to a track if ai was used and I am not interested in wasting my time on it - and the most important thing:

I am not the only one!

No, you're not the only one. But who cares? New flash. Not everybody liked The Beatles.

I can tolerate just about any kind of music. What I can't tolerate is all these self righteous people, especially self righteous classical musicians who won't listen to anything that was written after 1955.

Guess what? The popular music industry has survived just fine without these self righteous people supporting them.

You can like what you want and dislike what you want. That's the beautiful part of democracy. And I can do whatever I want without having to have disclaimers posted at the end of every song.

And there isn't a damn thing you can do about it.

[DCrown]

You simply don't get the points.

What music as human art could be and was
and what it is

Summary:
Today you are not faced with competitions to check your skills.
Every one can produce noise and upload it on every plattform. Very little music and lots of trash in one space.
Can you play in the NBA if you can't play basketball?
That's why there are professionell leagues, amateur, hobby.
Improvation skills were essential, would like to see who is able to improvise today lol
100.000 uploads on Spotify every day and 99,9% of trash, so in theory there should be quite a lot of great new songs every day, good luck finding them. AI will cause even a lot more uploads l, ain't that great ?! Music should be separated in music by musicians, amateur category, hobby category and ai.

Music business has become a clown show with lots of clowns who are not even able to do the most important thing a clown should do.
They don't even make you laugh, it all just rather makes one cry.

Using AI is just like someone unskilled is playing in the NBA, but he needs and has an assistant in a match whose task is to shoot a basket. Awkward.

[Tiles]

Using AI does not mean someone is unskilled. On the contrary, a professional would be unwise to ignore new possibilities. In a competitive environment, these tools naturally get adopted and they already are.

[DCrown]

Using AI does not mean someone is unskilled. On the contrary, a professional would be unwise to ignore new possibilities. In a competitive environment, these tools naturally get adopted and they already are.

I completely disagree, your comment is from today's perspective, where music doesn't sound better, people just tell it to make you believe, where music can't get less creative and more repetetive any more, where music is just a mass product.

What competition are you talking about?
Competition between clowns who don't have to prove their qualification.
All AI will do is to make music even sound worse and more uncreative and there will be 10 Mio uploads every day. What a great competition, makes sense lol
Music needs different leagues and categories, AI music is a league of its own is no art or music to me, it makes music completely worthless.
You can't join NBA if you can't play, simple as that and it makes sense.
You do not know to arrange, sing or mix, so stay away, there should be leagues or plattforma just for you.. You use ai? There should be an ai league for you, go there.

Results that are achieved too easy and fast are of low value and don't get a lot of appreciation. The view on it changes, cuz laziness, decadence and stupidity rule.
It is about qualification, qualification needs talent, talent needs training, the harder you work on it, the better you could get

I mean in what awkward times are we living? Where ai (music) and of is accepted, considered a normal or even good thing, but fact is that it contributes to decline of society, culture and art just to please lazy and decadent natures.

And Bach is turning over in his grave right now again

[Tiles]

According to some vocal critics, Bach already turned in his grave when the Beatles came along. And some of the most repetitive music ever made is called Techno, which came out of the nineties. Repetition and mass appeal are not inventions of AI.

Also, AI is not just a one click Suno toy. It already started years ago with mastering tools. And those tools are fully accepted in the market. Even the one click solutions have arrived in charts and releases that people actually listen to. Like it or not, that is the reality.

We are not playing basketball here. We are playing market. And in the market, what matters is what works. That's the only qualification that you need. Listeners do not care whether a song was mastered by hand with a compressor, EQ , exciters etc, or with Landr or Ozone using the one click assistant. Or if the musician has used an AI in the pipeline. The only difference is time and effort, not perceived value. Imagine you could release a whole album in a week instead of a month or a year. Or even in a day. That's what competition means.

Does this hurt to have yet another competitor? Sure. But musicians have always been hurt by others who were faster, cheaper, more efficient or simply better. Long before AI existed. The market has been oversaturated for decades already. AI did not cause that.

You can argue about taste, art and ideals. That is valid. But declaring entire tools or approaches as illegitimate does not stop them. It never has.

[procrastive]

You know, you people (bots?) are WAY off topic, right? The OP was asking for a singer to help him with his songs, and you keep arguing about AI. If he wanted AI, he wouldn't be asking for a singer, would he?

Sheesh!

[Tiles]

Thinking about AI in this context is not off topic at all. Discussions about AI in general, or assuming that every user of AI is clueless, might be off topic. But considering an AI singer is still relevant to the OP’s request. Tools like Synthesizer V or ACE Studio can sing exactly what you want if you provide the lyrics. It is not as simple as pressing a button, but it is a real option.

[enCiphered]

really? oh that's a shame if true! i hate AI vocals.

Right, so obviously the most relevant solution is… AI vocals.
The lights are on, but nobody’s home..

[Tiles]

It is one solution in case everything else fails. I hate so many things yet use them ...

[topaz]

I bet you are chuffed you posted here

Mods, here is a fine example of thread hijack.

i’m looking for a singer who obviously has a good voice, but also has access to record decent vocals with a decent microphone.

the song has an electronic style inspired by artists like thom yorke (radiohead) or james blake.

in my head, i picture a singer using a head voice or falsetto, similar to the singers i mentioned before. with that melancholic, haunting, ghostly vibe in the voice.

free collab

hit me up to send u the instrumental demo.

references of what i am looking for and the similar style of my production:

[atoms4infants]

AUTO-ADMIN: Non-MP3, WAV, OGG, SoundCloud, YouTube, Vimeo, Twitter and Facebook links in this post have been protected automatically. Once the member reaches 5 posts the links will function as normal.

I willing to have a go at adding vocals to your track. No AI will be used though I may use some pitch correction. Send me the track and if I think I can do something suitable I will let you know. You can check out some my work (all pre AI tech from about 10 years ago) on bandcamp. Possibly the closest to what your looking for in terms of falsetto is on this track: https://atomsforinfants.bandcamp.com/track/ten-years (https://atomsforinfants.bandcamp.com/track/ten-years)

Do you have lyrics?

[Aloysius]

For some insane reason I thought the thread title was ''any singer here who’d like to sing on a song inspired by Yoko Ono?''