How much does music theory really shape your compositions?

Chords, scales, harmony, melody, etc.
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

Benedict wrote: Sat May 30, 2026 10:28 pm
Tiles wrote: Sat May 30, 2026 8:34 am My approach: If it sounds good it is good.

I’ve noticed that the first two albums of a band often contain the most immediate and emotionally direct music. Later albums tend to be more polished and theoretically refined, but sometimes feel less raw and spontaneous.

In summary: I feel like too much theory can start to weight the music down and kill its natural flow.
While I indeed get this. I think it is not a case of correlation being causation.

I think we can say that Keith Emerson knew about as much Theory on "Just Take A Pebble" as he did on "Hot Seat". Same with Eddie V from "Eruption" to "Dreams". The biggest change here would be age and experience. Also a push for sales. It is all well and good to make Throbbing Gristle records, but sooner or later the label wants you to be able to feed their execs (not to mention your own kids) so you need to do a Genesis. That said, from having started in piss 'n' vinegar, at a certain point, it was no longer me, so I took different paths. And that, for a more mature person, tends to be smoother. No harm in that as an older person generally should be less 'mental'.

My two cents on the "If it sounds good it is good" thing. If it sounds good, chances are it is pretty solid Harmony anyway. So whether it was noted out by 'book rules', or felt, it is still good Harmony.
:-)

Post

About 100 years ago when I was in my first year as a music major, I recall my first composition prof using an analogy that went something like “music theory is the language, composition is the poetry” and I’ve heard a few other variations since then, but that always stuck with me. Music theory is descriptive, not prescriptive.
Logic Pro | LUNA Pro | OB-X8 | Prophet 6 | OB-6 | Trigon 6 | Rev2 | TEO-5 | Pro 3 | SE-1X | Minitaur | Integra-7 | TR-1000 | Analog RYTM mk2 | Digitakt 2 | TD-3 MO | TD-3 | Maschine+

Post

Now that I give it some serious thought, I've known music theory on some level for the entire time I've been composing/producing, and I feel like it's definitely shaped my output in a way that's not entirely insignificant. But I also don't go out of my way to employ it to the fullest extent possible. I just follow my own ears as to what sounds good and what doesn't.
My solo projects:
Hekkräiser (experimental) | MFG38 (electronic/soundtrack) | The Santtu Pesonen Project (metal/prog)

Post

cryophonik wrote: Sat May 30, 2026 11:03 pm About 100 years ago when I was in my first year as a music major, I recall my first composition prof using an analogy that went something like “music theory is the language, composition is the poetry” and I’ve heard a few other variations since then, but that always stuck with me. Music theory is descriptive, not prescriptive.
Yeah this is it exactly. It's a signpost, not a cop.

Post

I think Charlie Parker put it best (at least from the perspective of playing jazz). There are a few variations recorded, but they’re all along the same lines:

“First you learn your instrument, then you learn the music, then you forget all that shit and just play.”

Theory shouldn’t be something that constrains you, but it can be a great guide.

For me, I think it helps me get wherever I am try to go faster, and helps me figure out how to make music more interesting.

Post

AsPeeXXXVIII wrote: Sun May 31, 2026 8:42 am Now that I give it some serious thought, I've known music theory on some level for the entire time I've been composing/producing,..
I think that’s probably more common than you’d expect. When I was young, I had a piano/organ teacher who taught me to not only read the notes, but to look at the key signature, chord markings, follow the bass, etc. and helped me relate everything, rather than just reading the notes on the staves. She also showed me how to decipher chord markings when I asked her “why does it say F#dim7 over the bar?” Over time, I sort of instinctually starting incorporating that into my bass playing and it never even occurred to me that this was all music theory. When I started my first semester in college, I got several weeks into my Music Theory 101 course and started thinking, this is all basic music knowledge, when are we going to start learning music theory? I recall having a conversation with my professor (who, incidentally, purchased the house I grew up in) and he explained to me that all the knowledge of chord progressions and harmony I had learned from my previous instructors was all really just the fundamentals of theory. By the time the semester was done, I didn’t really learn anything new, but it really did help solidify all the pieces of knowledge I had gained in my younger days. It was like the whole course became one giant “lightbulb moment” for me.
Logic Pro | LUNA Pro | OB-X8 | Prophet 6 | OB-6 | Trigon 6 | Rev2 | TEO-5 | Pro 3 | SE-1X | Minitaur | Integra-7 | TR-1000 | Analog RYTM mk2 | Digitakt 2 | TD-3 MO | TD-3 | Maschine+

Post

I heard that quote from a guitar player: ' first you learn the rules of music and then you try to forget them.'
What lies behind us and what lies before us are small matters compared to what lies within us. - Emerson

Post

EyeCloud wrote: Sun May 31, 2026 3:56 pm Charlie Parker -
“First you learn your instrument, then you learn the music, then you forget all that shit and just play.”
When Brian Eno was asked in an interview how he created his music he said that one method he likes to use is to pick a single note and play it until it resonates. If it took an hour or two then he played that note for an hour or two. Then he would find a different note, and if it took an hour or two for the two notes to resonate then he would play those two notes for an hour or two. This would continue until he had built a chord and then a chord sequence.

This isn't a method I use per se but understanding it has been crucial to how I make (original?!) music. Sometimes it's important to play only one or two notes, no sheet music or record button, and simply listen to the sounds the instrument makes.

Post

My girlfriend who has a masters in something music related, can't remember what exactly, gave me a book called "Harmony" when I asked her about music theory. The thing is...I have to read music notation in this book. Made it until about the third chapter before I gave up. (Chapter 1 - triads. I could read that notation!) I guess I COULD learn to read music and finish the book.

The last time I read music was a piano book when I was a child, before my piano teacher died of lung cancer and then I just became a noodler for the rest of my life.
REAPER + Davinci Resolve Pro on Manjaro KDE. Neve 88m. Focusrite 18i20 2nd gen. Neumann NDH30 headphones. Mics: Telefunken TF39, AT4050, Miktek C7e, EV RE-15. VSTs: u-he Hive 2, F'em, Renoise Redux, Apisonic Speedrum 2.

Post

Cuauhtli wrote: Sun May 31, 2026 8:10 pm I heard that quote from a guitar player: ' first you learn the rules of music and then you try to forget them.'
I've heard basically the same quote applied to many artistic fields. The problem is that most people can't forget.
When the data is corrupt in the Desert of the Real, Beyond the Last Thought, where intuition reigns, is the solace that will embolden and strengthen the soul, giving hope once more to this age of failing technique. eassae.com

Post Reply

Return to “Music Theory”