noVoxon wrote: Sun Jun 14, 2026 2:20 pm By the way, has anyone successfully installed the freebie Annulus on a Mac?
it crashes validation in logic under mojave
Correct, only possible to re route Time effects. However adding parallel routing to additional FX is straight forward as an implementation.pabloaldunate wrote: Sun Jun 14, 2026 2:18 pmSure, but I think it is not possible for the effects.Voxon wrote: Sun Jun 14, 2026 2:17 pmIsn't this already possible? There's a button saying STR:VAR:STU on the menu bar. Click that 6 times and it says PARALLEL.pabloaldunate wrote: Sun Jun 14, 2026 12:37 pm Parallel routing for the effects would be really nice
I have a more stable build ready based on fixes from incoming crash reports, Annulus will be updated in a couple of days.
phasefiasco wrote: Sun Jun 14, 2026 4:24 pm I have a more stable build ready based on fixes from incoming crash reports, Annulus will be updated in a couple of days.
Yes I was thinking this exact thing when I was playing around with the added sequencer functionality today. We could add an "empty" sequencer beneath with options to add any target of the additional FX, as soon as you add a destination of the sequencer a new empty sequencer appears, and so on. Then there's no limit on how many parameters you wish to sequence.MichaelWhiteMusic wrote: Mon Jun 15, 2026 12:44 pm Amazing!! I bought it day one and can't be happier about it!
Will you be adding the chance to have all the FX on the sequencer? (A la infiltrator)
Thank you so much for the fast updates and for implementing the randomization features. The plugin now feels complete and really unfolds its magic!phasefiasco wrote: Mon Jun 15, 2026 12:36 pm New update available!
- Redo/Undo
- Random fills and values on sequencers
- Set specific sequencer length, that is not tied to */ 16 steps
- Stutter repetition length/duration - create snappy and tight stutters. Works for both regular stutter and Bend it stutter
- Window size stores on open/close
- Recording automation of the X/Y now works as expected (previously only Y parameter got recorded and not X)
That sounds absolutely perfect to me.phasefiasco wrote: Mon Jun 15, 2026 12:49 pmYes I was thinking this exact thing when I was playing around with the added sequencer functionality today. We could add an "empty" sequencer beneath with options to add any target of the additional FX, as soon as you add a destination of the sequencer a new empty sequencer appears, and so on. Then there's no limit on how many parameters you wish to sequence.MichaelWhiteMusic wrote: Mon Jun 15, 2026 12:44 pm Amazing!! I bought it day one and can't be happier about it!
Will you be adding the chance to have all the FX on the sequencer? (A la infiltrator)
That's gonna be totally mentalphasefiasco wrote: Mon Jun 15, 2026 12:49 pmYes I was thinking this exact thing when I was playing around with the added sequencer functionality today. We could add an "empty" sequencer beneath with options to add any target of the additional FX, as soon as you add a destination of the sequencer a new empty sequencer appears, and so on. Then there's no limit on how many parameters you wish to sequence.MichaelWhiteMusic wrote: Mon Jun 15, 2026 12:44 pm Amazing!! I bought it day one and can't be happier about it!
Will you be adding the chance to have all the FX on the sequencer? (A la infiltrator)
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026