(2) is not going to happen and the sooner that this is accepted the more realistic your perspective can be. Even saying that reveals that you just don't understand how useful that they are and how in the contexts that they are extremely useful, that there is no going back to pre-LLM and this perspective is not dependent on anything more ever being developed or available. Moreover, it is not dependent on anything obscenely expensive being available.exmatproton wrote: Fri Jul 10, 2026 5:00 pmthat's because it's relatively new still. Wait for 1 or 2 years......Innermost wrote: Fri Jul 10, 2026 4:24 pm While some of you are criticizing my work, just want you to know that 20 persons downloaded my VST for free in one or two hours.
While we are all saying that AI is bullshit, what is true, we all know that, we are alimenting debates and creating the opposite that we were seeking: an interest.
So thanks for your comments, whatever you say, that makes that my post is enough visible because of your critics.
2 most probable outcomes; 1) LLM's have taken over most creative output. 2) LLM's are being put to rest.
I use them every single day for work at the cost of electricity and sunk cost into consumer level hardware. EVERY DAY. Just on the basis of document understanding alone, they are amazing. You have a code base, you don't understand it, openwiki will generate documentation for the entire codebase for you.
I think that most of you would benefit from reading this book. Cory Doctorow is not an AI apologist and yet his take is very much aligned with my own. He distinguishes between centaurs and reverse centaurs. The former are people like me, who are able to control how the AI is used in their work and are experiencing amazing productivity. Reverse centaurs are those people who are being told to use AI by capital.
Cory is a sci-fi writer, among other things, and I really like his take on the silliness of the sci-fi takes on AI.
