Native Instruments Supersaw synth

[parma]

SuperStarSaw is a really dumb name.

This concludes my first impressions.

[Munin]

Most people will probably just call it "Super Saw" which is going to be confusing.

[Dalle]

can't double click parameters to set them to "init" values. My biggest workflow bummer so far.

That’s annoying. They did the same with Kontour and it makes me not want to use it.

SuperStarSaw is a really dumb name.

This concludes my first impressions.

It’s a great name.

[D-Fusion]

SuperStarSaw is a really dumb name.

This concludes my first impressions.

I agree.
It is the worst name I have seen so far when it comes to a Synthesizer and i have heard them all.
It sounds so Cringe, Cloudy and Woke that i want to puke everytime i hear it

But the most important thing is the sound

[Dirtgrain]

[jamcat]

I thought the name was Super Asterisk Saw.

[parma]

I thought the name was Super Asterisk Saw.

That would be an improvement

[machinesworking]

Nothing to do with the conversation, spit and bile...

I think you don't seem to ever be looking for resolution with any sort of misunderstanding. You just seem to have an obsessive need to be "right", nothing you wrote about has anything to do with your claim. I quoted you saying this:

the new platform allows you to make stand alone instruments that users can then use with a custom GUI that you build without having to own reactor. That's totally different

Do you really think your going to be able to build Reaktor instruments without owning Reaktor or is this just really poorly worded? because if you believe this or believe that the NI mods on that forum were saying this, then you're hopeless.

I'm guessing you meant be able to buy Reaktor instruments without owning Reaktor or deal with the old "player", just a guess though.

[solar28]

This is the only synth ever released that has a supersaw. Glad to see NI doing things that have never existed.

[agharta]

Now this is a super saw:

[IvyBirds]

Nothing to do with the conversation, spit and bile...

I think you don't seem to ever be looking for resolution with any sort of misunderstanding. You just seem to have an obsessive need to be "right", nothing you wrote about has anything to do with your claim. I quoted you saying this:

the new platform allows you to make stand alone instruments that users can then use with a custom GUI that you build without having to own reactor. That's totally different

The level of projection here is mind-boggling, but let’s get one thing straight: I don’t have an "obsessive need to be right." I simply am right. There's a massive difference between an obsession and just being factually correct.
What is obsessive—and completely pathetic—is being so utterly desperate for a win that you literally doctor text inside quote tags to fabricate something I never typed.

Altering another member's words in a quote isn't just weak; it's a direct violation of forum rules. You couldn't dismantle what I actually wrote, so you resorted to straight-up forgery just to invent a strawman you could argue against.
If you have to break basic board rules and cheat just to cope with being wrong, you’ve already lost. Absolutely embarrassing behavior.

Do you really think your going to be able to build Reaktor instruments without owning Reaktor or is this just really poorly worded? because if you believe this or believe that the NI mods on that forum were saying this, then you're hopeless.

I'm guessing you meant be able to buy Reaktor instruments without owning Reaktor or deal with the old "player", just a guess though.

And right on schedule, here comes yet another lazy strawman because you’re so utterly desperate for a win you have to invent things I never said just to have something to attack.

I have been crystal clear from the beginning: I am talking about what Matthew from NI explicitly stated—that creators will soon be able to build patches and Ensembles in Reaktor and turn those into standalone instruments. To anyone with a functioning brain, it is glaringly obvious that of course you have to own Reaktor to build them in Reaktor. Nobody said you didn't.
The point—which keeps flying straight over your head—is that once created, these standalone instruments won't need Reaktor or Reaktor Player to run. We literally already have proof of this exact architecture in action with Super*Saw.
Stop trying to "guess" what I meant or fabricate quotes to salvage your failed argument.

[El°HYM]

I am the Walrus.

I think I am the Walrus.

I am he as you are he.

[stillshaded]

It's nice to see synths. But what I'd really like is an update to Battery, including larger GUI and fonts. Instead of making new things, how about just maintain and modernize the things they already made?

Came here to say this. Come on NI. There are a lot of features from other drum plugins that I would like to see in battery. Easier layering and a playback offset parameter, mainly.

[concealed identity]

It took 17 pages but we did it folks, someone actually called the synth "woke".

[IvyBirds]

I am the Walrus.

I think I am the Walrus.

I am he as you are he.

Goo goo goo g'joob