KVR Audio

OzoneJunkie · Post by **OzoneJunkie** » Sat Jan 22, 2005 2:08 am

Surprised no threads on this. Looks like it's getting some good updates, and some Live-type features...

LoRez · Post by **LoRez** » Sat Jan 22, 2005 2:34 am

Yeah, looks pretty awesome....especially that new synth.

Metanol · Post by **Metanol** » Sat Jan 22, 2005 10:02 pm

Yep. Multitrack audio recording and editing, freeze function plus other goodies.
Which is nice.

tkay77 · Post by **tkay77** » Sat Jan 22, 2005 11:01 pm

..i even think they took some ideas from Live...but when it´s cheaper..it´s okay for me...

tkay

OzoneJunkie · Post by **OzoneJunkie** » Sun Jan 23, 2005 2:39 am

How's Project 5's VST support? Is it a wrapper?

davidlinn · Post by **davidlinn** » Sun Jan 23, 2005 3:35 am

I was disappointed with P5 from the get-go. I actually thought it was going to die on the vine, since it didn't seem to generate any significant user group activity. Using FL5, Live 4, Audition, etc, I never really found a place for it in my studio. I'll take another look at it in its upgraded form, though, and see if it improved to the point where it can be useful.

David

www.davidlinn.com

LoRez · Post by **LoRez** » Sun Jan 23, 2005 9:34 am

OzoneJunkie wrote:How's Project 5's VST support? Is it a wrapper?

Oh no....here we go...

LoRez · Post by **LoRez** » Sun Jan 23, 2005 9:37 am

davidlinn wrote:I was disappointed with P5 from the get-go. I actually thought it was going to die on the vine, since it didn't seem to generate any significant user group activity. Using FL5, Live 4, Audition, etc, I never really found a place for it in my studio. I'll take another look at it in its upgraded form, though, and see if it improved to the point where it can be useful.

David

www.davidlinn.com

You mean useful to you I assume as opposed to just in general.

And there was no FL5 or Live4 when P5 was released.

Amberience · Post by **Amberience** » Sun Jan 23, 2005 9:40 am

LoRez wrote:
davidlinn wrote:I was disappointed with P5 from the get-go. I actually thought it was going to die on the vine, since it didn't seem to generate any significant user group activity. Using FL5, Live 4, Audition, etc, I never really found a place for it in my studio. I'll take another look at it in its upgraded form, though, and see if it improved to the point where it can be useful.

David

www.davidlinn.com
You mean useful to you I assume as opposed to just in general. And there was no FL5 or Live4 when P5 was released.

You dumbass. He already mentioned HIS studio, so being "useful to him" was already intrinsic in his message.

Learn to read.

LoRez · Post by **LoRez** » Sun Jan 23, 2005 10:09 am

Acolmiztli wrote:
LoRez wrote:
davidlinn wrote:I was disappointed with P5 from the get-go. I actually thought it was going to die on the vine, since it didn't seem to generate any significant user group activity. Using FL5, Live 4, Audition, etc, I never really found a place for it in my studio. I'll take another look at it in its upgraded form, though, and see if it improved to the point where it can be useful.

David

www.davidlinn.com
You mean useful to you I assume as opposed to just in general. And there was no FL5 or Live4 when P5 was released.
You dumbass. He already mentioned HIS studio, so being "useful to him" was already intrinsic in his message.

Learn to read.

Wow...harsh there bud. I'm not sure anything I said called for being called a "dumbass" and insinuating that somehow I can't read, which is utterly rediculous when you consider that reading and writing is EXACTLY how we are communicating right this minute. And technically, the fact that he mentioned his studio at some poiint in the post does not "intrinsically" mean he meant P5 was not useful to him only. It could be inferred either way by the way it is written. No matter...you inferred one way and I inferred another. I don't think our different inferences make me a "dumbass". This was strengthened furthermore to the implied comparison to software that was not even released when P5 was released....possibly further adding to any confusion.

Fine if you think my comment wasn't called for...but you might want to find a more articulate and appropriate way of saying so in the future.

And by the way (to David)...some nice artwork there on your site.

Germ777 · Post by **Germ777** » Sun Jan 23, 2005 10:26 am

LoRez wrote:
You mean useful to you I assume as opposed to just in general. And there was no FL5 or Live4 when P5 was released.

When was P5 released? I think FL is a bit older. isn´t it?
Just curious.

LoRez · Post by **LoRez** » Sun Jan 23, 2005 10:33 am

Germ wrote:
LoRez wrote:
You mean useful to you I assume as opposed to just in general. And there was no FL5 or Live4 when P5 was released.
When was P5 released? I think FL is a bit older. isn´t it?
Just curious.

Yeah FL is older...but FL5 isn't. I guess I didn't think the camparison was really fair as stated. Anyway, for what it's worth I always really liked FL a lot for creating drums. FL5 looks like a relatively substantial upgrade, but I've had no opportunity to see it in action.

Cabinfever · Post by **Cabinfever** » Sun Jan 23, 2005 10:59 am

project 5 was an ugly unstable & unfriendly piece of shite - oh, well in my opinion anyway. i returned my copy to the dealer who gave me my money back because he'd installed it on his own machine and agreed with me !

Amberience · Post by **Amberience** » Sun Jan 23, 2005 11:00 am

vista · Post by **vista** » Sun Jan 23, 2005 11:03 am

ORION is alot better !

Cakewalk Project 5 2.0