and worse yet...they can't not bang the damn things...it's like primal or something, you're talking to them one second then they think they're Bohnam...if that isn't bad enough, even if a drummer isn't around and you crank up your ax the damn snare won't shut up...how could it get worse? Simple, another problem is hinks law drum activity..."anywhere a drumset sits for a while there will always be someone who is a wanna be air drummer who just has to give it a try"...nuffink wrote:Really? How does that tie in with your blanket statement...3*s wrote:Some drummers are like that and some aren't, so find a good sound source.Most drummers aren't Tony Williams. Most aren't Clyde Stubblefield. Most are shit.3*s wrote:What some people tend to not realise is regardless of how good your multisampled drum or guitar library is, and regardless of your programming skill, it's not going to sound as good as a real drummer.
Could someone please explain anti-loop snobbery?
- Rad Grandad
- 38041 posts since 6 Sep, 2003 from Downeast Maine
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.
-
- KVRAF
- 6519 posts since 13 Mar, 2002 from UK
That conveniently misses that the first name I mentioned was Tony Williams.3*s wrote:I'm guessing your definition of good is "how close the drummer is to Clyde Stubblefield stylistically."
-
- KVRAF
- 6740 posts since 25 Mar, 2002 from sheffield, england
So you are using loops to cover up your own defiencies. Fine if you're happy, as you say its not an exam. Personally, I'm just doing it for my own satisfaction, and I get much more of that if I know I built the whole track from scratch, instead of prefab building blocks.shamann wrote:But it can go both ways. That 12 year-old kid might be using loops made by a field of virtuosi. Strings it together and states, "Please match this on all accords."
-
- KVRAF
- 13442 posts since 14 Nov, 2000 from Hannover / Germany
I just use whatever gets the job done. Sometimes loops do (in whatever reincarnation), sometimes they don't. Yes, it's indeed that easy.
There are 3 kinds of people:
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
-
- KVRian
- 1243 posts since 24 Oct, 2003 from Maine
Either way, the same thing applies.nuffink wrote:That conveniently misses that the first name I mentioned was Tony Williams.3*s wrote:I'm guessing your definition of good is "how close the drummer is to Clyde Stubblefield stylistically."
-
- The Teach
- 8273 posts since 23 Jul, 2002 from flatness
do all graphics designers take their own photos and build their own fonts from scratch ???
do all painters mix and suspend their own pigments ???
slainte
rob
do all painters mix and suspend their own pigments ???
slainte
-
- KVRAF
- 2285 posts since 20 Dec, 2002 from The Benighted States of Trumpistan
What about honest, human emotion and feeling? Sure, the person who recorded the original loop may have had it -- and loops can be used in many worthwhile ways -- but if all there is is the same two-bar loop over and over and over identically, what sort of tension and release can it express? It seems the only reaction you can conjure is an annoying stimulus that causes relief at its absence. Corrct me if I'm wrong -- and I do mean that, with examples, please, but in my world-view, musicianship matters.platinumears wrote:Point is, if you do it all yourself you will probably end up with something unique that could not be done by a 12 year-old with a bunch of loops..shamann wrote:If a 12 year old kid comes up with the exact same song as you by stringing together pre-fab loops in 30 minutes, while you took two months to come up with the same end result by scratch, is anyone really going to give a damn at the end? Same song either way, but man I sure can hear your sweat on that mp3 over there.
Wait... loot _then_ burn? D'oh!
-
- KVRAF
- 4735 posts since 20 Feb, 2004 from Gothenburg, Sweden
In my mind In my mind In my mind In my mind In my mind In my mind
or
What's your one purpose on life? What's your one purpose on life? What's your one purpose on life? What's your one purpose on life? What's your one purpose on life?
To explode ofcourse.
etc.
or
What's your one purpose on life? What's your one purpose on life? What's your one purpose on life? What's your one purpose on life? What's your one purpose on life?
To explode ofcourse.
etc.
Stefan H Singer
https://dropshotaudio.com/
https://dropshotaudio.com/
-
- The Teach
- 8273 posts since 23 Jul, 2002 from flatness
-
- KVRAF
- 12235 posts since 18 Aug, 2003
Not sure what this bit means, but moving on..platinumears wrote:So you are using loops to cover up your own defiencies.
Sure, that's fine for you as an artist, but how is that a justification of hierarchy? There's a difference in not using loops in your music and scoffing at the very idea.platinumears wrote:Fine if you're happy, as you say its not an exam. Personally, I'm just doing it for my own satisfaction, and I get much more of that if I know I built the whole track from scratch, instead of prefab building blocks.
-
- KVRian
- 637 posts since 5 Sep, 2001 from Hollywood, Ca. one block East of the Jack in the Box
Personally, I have nothing against loops, but the problem is, when people use them, they have a tendency to stop thinking of rhythm as another instrument that needs as much dynamics and variation as any other part and just let a loop run over and over.
Which is to say, personally, I have nothing against loops, but the problem is, when people use them, they have a tendency to stop thinking of rhythm as another instrument that needs as much dynamics and variation as any other part and just let a loop run over and over.
Which is to say, personally, I have nothing against loops, but the problem is, when people use them, they have a tendency to stop thinking of rhythm as another instrument that needs as much dynamics and variation as any other part and just let a loop run over and over.
Which is to say, personally, I have nothing against loops, but the problem is, when people use them, they have a tendency to stop thinking of rhythm as another instrument that needs as much dynamics and variation as any other part and just let a loop run over and over.
Which is to say, personally, I have nothing against loops, but the problem is, when people use them, they have a tendency to stop thinking of rhythm as another instrument that needs as much dynamics and variation as any other part and just let a loop run over and over.
Which is to say, personally, I have nothing against loops, but the problem is, when people use them, they have a tendency to stop thinking of rhythm as another instrument that needs as much dynamics and variation as any other part and just let a loop run over and over.
...annoying, isn't it
-S.
Which is to say, personally, I have nothing against loops, but the problem is, when people use them, they have a tendency to stop thinking of rhythm as another instrument that needs as much dynamics and variation as any other part and just let a loop run over and over.
Which is to say, personally, I have nothing against loops, but the problem is, when people use them, they have a tendency to stop thinking of rhythm as another instrument that needs as much dynamics and variation as any other part and just let a loop run over and over.
Which is to say, personally, I have nothing against loops, but the problem is, when people use them, they have a tendency to stop thinking of rhythm as another instrument that needs as much dynamics and variation as any other part and just let a loop run over and over.
Which is to say, personally, I have nothing against loops, but the problem is, when people use them, they have a tendency to stop thinking of rhythm as another instrument that needs as much dynamics and variation as any other part and just let a loop run over and over.
Which is to say, personally, I have nothing against loops, but the problem is, when people use them, they have a tendency to stop thinking of rhythm as another instrument that needs as much dynamics and variation as any other part and just let a loop run over and over.
...annoying, isn't it
-S.

-
- KVRAF
- 13442 posts since 14 Nov, 2000 from Hannover / Germany
No. Can we have another 128 bars of it?Sleek Month wrote: ...annoying, isn't it![]()
There are 3 kinds of people:
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
- Rad Grandad
- 38041 posts since 6 Sep, 2003 from Downeast Maine
what about those like me...ultimately when people listen to my music they will be listening to my guitar playing. If I program a straight beat and render it to a loop and save it for the future, how is this different then playing the same drums over and over. FWIW I don't do this, every song I write out the drum parts because it's how I learned. But certainly if I used drum loops to back up my playing, my expression on guitar will be the primary focus of attention anyhow...Jafo wrote:What about honest, human emotion and feeling? Sure, the person who recorded the original loop may have had it -- and loops can be used in many worthwhile ways -- but if all there is is the same two-bar loop over and over and over identically, what sort of tension and release can it express? It seems the only reaction you can conjure is an annoying stimulus that causes relief at its absence. Corrct me if I'm wrong -- and I do mean that, with examples, please, but in my world-view, musicianship matters.platinumears wrote:Point is, if you do it all yourself you will probably end up with something unique that could not be done by a 12 year-old with a bunch of loops..shamann wrote:If a 12 year old kid comes up with the exact same song as you by stringing together pre-fab loops in 30 minutes, while you took two months to come up with the same end result by scratch, is anyone really going to give a damn at the end? Same song either way, but man I sure can hear your sweat on that mp3 over there.
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.
-
- KVRAF
- 6740 posts since 25 Mar, 2002 from sheffield, england
Depends how many pills you've swallowed..Sleek Month wrote: ...annoying, isn't it![]()