Anyway to reduce the spill on vocal tracks
-
- KVRAF
- 3125 posts since 6 Dec, 2002 from Ljubljana/ Slovenia
Hi
Due to not enough headphones I recorded some singing (3 voices) with monitors turned on (kinda loud - punk thing).
Is there a way to clean those vocal tracks a bit (gate? nah...some kind of noise removal with fingerprint?)
I know there can only be a little improvement over what I have but still.
thanks
k
Due to not enough headphones I recorded some singing (3 voices) with monitors turned on (kinda loud - punk thing).
Is there a way to clean those vocal tracks a bit (gate? nah...some kind of noise removal with fingerprint?)
I know there can only be a little improvement over what I have but still.
thanks
k
-
- KVRAF
- 6740 posts since 25 Mar, 2002 from sheffield, england
Its probably too late now, but there is a trick I learnt which can work very well in this situation:
Record a vocal take with monitors on in the room, without worrying about spill.
Being very careful not to move the mic or speakers (or any furniture in the room for that matter) record another vocal take, but with the polarity inverted on the monitor mix.
When the two takes are mixed together the inverted versions of the backing track will largely cancel out..
I've used this technique very succesfully to record a choir when individual headphones were not an option.. (they needed double-tracking anyway as the usual numbers had been whittled down to just the ones who could be relied on to sing in tune!)
Record a vocal take with monitors on in the room, without worrying about spill.
Being very careful not to move the mic or speakers (or any furniture in the room for that matter) record another vocal take, but with the polarity inverted on the monitor mix.
When the two takes are mixed together the inverted versions of the backing track will largely cancel out..
I've used this technique very succesfully to record a choir when individual headphones were not an option.. (they needed double-tracking anyway as the usual numbers had been whittled down to just the ones who could be relied on to sing in tune!)
- KVRAF
- 9064 posts since 1 Aug, 2003
Cool Edit, Voxengo ReduNoise, there are prolly more...soulata wrote:noise removal with fingerprint
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3125 posts since 6 Dec, 2002 from Ljubljana/ Slovenia
It's more a question if it'd work.cptgone wrote:Cool Edit, Voxengo ReduNoise, there are prolly more...
@platinumears
Would reversing the polarity on recorded tracks work as well?
I'll try and see I guess.
Thanks
K
-
- KVRAF
- 6740 posts since 25 Mar, 2002 from sheffield, england
I suppose its worth a try.. the two different takes certainly shouldn't cancel out! Did anything change in the room between takes?soulata wrote:Would reversing the polarity on recorded tracks work as well?
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 3125 posts since 6 Dec, 2002 from Ljubljana/ Slovenia
Nothing changed in the room. I'll try it in the morning, I can't just now (fed up with recording and that).
I'll post the results. Hopefully good.
k
I'll post the results. Hopefully good.
k
-
Stupid American Pig Stupid American Pig https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=4753
- KVRAF
- 7065 posts since 25 Nov, 2002 from not sure
What, putting on a hoodie, and running on the treadmill? I think you would have to clear the baby bath off of it first, plus your vocal takes may sound a bit "winded"mjones4th wrote:Try this:
-
- KVRAF
- 2172 posts since 14 Feb, 2003
Yes, particularly effective, since all noise is then generated in the 'front' ground...S_A_P wrote:
What, putting on a hoodie, and running on the treadmill? I think you would have to clear the baby bath off of it first, plus your vocal takes may sound a bit "winded"![]()
![]()
