K guys i'm giving up. I can't pursuade you. It's a different way of thinking. N'uff said. I can't provide evidence on subjective stuff cause its all in the eyes of the beholderflex42 wrote:It's probably your subconsciousness hearing 0,1 db differences...
SAMPLITUDE RULES (DAW Summing)
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 301 posts since 5 Jun, 2004
-
- KVRAF
- 6519 posts since 13 Mar, 2002 from UK
It's not a different way of thinking. It's not subjective. It's delusional and just plain wrong.
There are a bunch of nutters on the web that believe the earth is flat. Is that just a different way of thinking?
There are a bunch of nutters out there called breatharians who claim they never consume food, and that they live on light alone. Is that just a different way of thinking?
Millions of nutters sincerely believe Elvis Presley is still alive. Is that just a different way of thinking?
If it's a different way of thinking let's give it a different name. How about stupidity?
There are a bunch of nutters on the web that believe the earth is flat. Is that just a different way of thinking?
There are a bunch of nutters out there called breatharians who claim they never consume food, and that they live on light alone. Is that just a different way of thinking?
Millions of nutters sincerely believe Elvis Presley is still alive. Is that just a different way of thinking?
If it's a different way of thinking let's give it a different name. How about stupidity?
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 301 posts since 5 Jun, 2004
Nope. It's a fact cause you can prove that with sat photos or just sailing all over it.nuffink wrote:It's not a different way of thinking. It's not subjective. It's delusional and just plain wrong.
There are a bunch of nutters on the web that believe the earth is flat. Is that just a different way of thinking?
Nope cause it is biologically proven wrong, and if asked to do so under controlled conditions they would fail (R.I.P)nuffink wrote: There are a bunch of nutters out there called breatharians who claim they never consume food, and that they live on light alone. Is that just a different way of thinking?
I don't know ? Have u been there and conducted a DNA test on the body's tissues and ones from Elvis to prove it belongs to him ?nuffink wrote: Millions of nutters sincerely believe Elvis Presley is still alive. Is that just a different way of thinking?
If you admit that they null at -150 then indeed there is difference. If the scientists or you are able to prove we are not affected by it is up for proving.nuffink wrote:If it's a different way of thinking let's give it a different name.
Again i said the engine, per se, was not the only factor I mentioned for possible difference in sound.
Or : "stupidity and narrow minded-ness with a profound talent for not providing arguments on your own point of view" could be anothernuffink wrote:How about stupidity?
-
- KVRAF
- 6519 posts since 13 Mar, 2002 from UK
Well, stupidity was snappier but that'll do too.popsych wrote:Or : "stupidity and narrow minded-ness with a profound talent for not providing arguments on your own point of view" could be anothernuffink wrote:How about stupidity?
-
- KVRAF
- 4738 posts since 20 Feb, 2004 from Gothenburg, Sweden
-
- KVRAF
- 6519 posts since 13 Mar, 2002 from UK
If I remember correctly Farluker hosted last time we did this. I can't remember who did it the time before that.stefancrs wrote:FWIW we are conducting a test
I have generated 16 stereo wavs of white noise at 44.100 samples / second in 32bit float.
We will perform two different mixdowns:
1) Just all the noise wavs playing simultaenously with channels set to -6dB. The master at 0dB though.
2) Same as above, but also utilising two send busses. All channels should send themselves to both bus 1 and bus 2 at -6dB.
Mixdown should be created in 32bit float. No normalizing, it should not be needed, and if it is for some strange reason, it will be done during the "nulling test".
Anyone care to host the files? I can do the test in Podium, popsych will do the test in samplitude. It would be good if we could put up a page with the source files needed, this instruction, and the resulting files and comparisons.
To refer people to in the future I mean.
If anyone's up to the hosting tasks, it's a 1Mb rar for the source files.
Btw, anyone can feel free to do the test in hosts already tested, if the results differ, we know someone made a mistake
It's a good idea though. At least it shuts the morons up for a while.
-
- KVRist
- 410 posts since 8 Jan, 2004 from Switzerland
you can send them to me, i can host them.
you can reach me (and send them) at hotmail.com
you can reach me (and send them) at hotmail.com
-
- KVRist
- 410 posts since 8 Jan, 2004 from Switzerland
-
- KVRist
- 410 posts since 8 Jan, 2004 from Switzerland
if i remember well hotmail don't let more than 1mg
so
you should better send them at @freesurf.ch
so
you should better send them at @freesurf.ch
Last edited by dramsenik on Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRist
- 410 posts since 8 Jan, 2004 from Switzerland
head to
http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=75793
to download the test files and for further discussion
http://www.kvraudio.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=75793
to download the test files and for further discussion
Last edited by dramsenik on Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:09 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- KVRAF
- 4738 posts since 20 Feb, 2004 from Gothenburg, Sweden
-
- KVRist
- 178 posts since 21 Oct, 2003 from France
Boring

-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 301 posts since 5 Jun, 2004
Yep u r right. Keep things simple so even you can keep upnuffink wrote:Well, stupidity was snappier but that'll do too.popsych wrote:Or : "stupidity and narrow minded-ness with a profound talent for not providing arguments on your own point of view" could be anothernuffink wrote:How about stupidity?
-
- KVRAF
- 6519 posts since 13 Mar, 2002 from UK
Astonishing how many idiots use that one. Not usually u r but I guess you're an AOL kiddie.popsych wrote:Yep u r right. Keep things simple so even you can keep up
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 301 posts since 5 Jun, 2004
Your idiocy hasn?t stopped amazing me since day one that I started this tread. You started name calling for no apparent reason other than your inability to showcase your point of view with facts rather than, how can i put this gently, bull*** and I?m not going to reply with an insult even though I easily could, cause we have filled the forum with enough s***.nuffink wrote:Astonishing how many idiots use that one. Not usually u r but I guess you're an AOL kiddie.popsych wrote:Yep u r right. Keep things simple so even you can keep up
And interesting you commenting on me replacing the you are with u r (I just use that for speed), when your sentence is grammatically wrong.
Grow up already
