A tracker better than Renoise...?
-
- KVRer
- 16 posts since 23 Sep, 2004
Hello,
I have my roots in tracking, but these days I use a combination of sequencers and trackers to get my work done... FL Studio/Orion working in tandem (an unholy alliance for some!) for my sequencing needs, and over the last twelve months, a definitive shift to a modern, actively-developed tracker - Renoise - from FT2 and, of late, Modplug.
I was recently drifting about the tracking scene, and discovered a couple of gems I was curious about. I remember Skale and Psycle from some time ago, but they weren't nearly as fleshed out then as they are now. They both look pretty cool, with some solid features, but my first impressions were that development had slowed to a crawl (which tends to scare me away... I like active, energetic, perpetually-busy development teams!).
MadTracker just doesn't do it for me, I dunno. I can't explain it, but it feels "old" and needlessly clunky for nostalgia's sake (or something), when compared to Renoise. I just could never get into it, and I can't quite justify why. But it's probably the next most competent modern tracker, and development is still ongoing and exciting. I'll keep my eye on it.
And now... two new artifacts I never knew existed before. One is Aero, which seems Buzz-like but more aesthetically appealing/polished in appearance. Its power certainly seems well established. And Aodix, which looks like a direct competitor to Renoise for the tracker/sequencer hybrid prog (Renoise has lots of neat stuff that mostly only sequencers have, like the obvious VSTi support, for instance... yet it's undeniably a tracker).
These are all brief thoughts on what I consider to be the most optimal line-up for the best of today's trackers. I consider Renoise to be the best of them all (on the surface, Aodix doesn't appear to be vastly superior if at all, but I've yet to play around with it). So... I'm wondering if the trackers in the KVR community would mind sharing their thoughts on any/all of these progs?
I'm always looking for another great piece of software to add to my arsenal... the most important things to me, after using Renoise and becoming submerged in its community, is ASIO and VST support, as well as a strong commitment from the development team (I just hate the thought of becoming wrapped up in another tracking niche, only for it to dissolve soon thereafter).
Basically... for the very straightforward characteristics I need out of a tracker (things like a solid integrated sampler and automation are just bonuses), is there a better tracker than Renoise out there?
Thanks,
-Tom
I have my roots in tracking, but these days I use a combination of sequencers and trackers to get my work done... FL Studio/Orion working in tandem (an unholy alliance for some!) for my sequencing needs, and over the last twelve months, a definitive shift to a modern, actively-developed tracker - Renoise - from FT2 and, of late, Modplug.
I was recently drifting about the tracking scene, and discovered a couple of gems I was curious about. I remember Skale and Psycle from some time ago, but they weren't nearly as fleshed out then as they are now. They both look pretty cool, with some solid features, but my first impressions were that development had slowed to a crawl (which tends to scare me away... I like active, energetic, perpetually-busy development teams!).
MadTracker just doesn't do it for me, I dunno. I can't explain it, but it feels "old" and needlessly clunky for nostalgia's sake (or something), when compared to Renoise. I just could never get into it, and I can't quite justify why. But it's probably the next most competent modern tracker, and development is still ongoing and exciting. I'll keep my eye on it.
And now... two new artifacts I never knew existed before. One is Aero, which seems Buzz-like but more aesthetically appealing/polished in appearance. Its power certainly seems well established. And Aodix, which looks like a direct competitor to Renoise for the tracker/sequencer hybrid prog (Renoise has lots of neat stuff that mostly only sequencers have, like the obvious VSTi support, for instance... yet it's undeniably a tracker).
These are all brief thoughts on what I consider to be the most optimal line-up for the best of today's trackers. I consider Renoise to be the best of them all (on the surface, Aodix doesn't appear to be vastly superior if at all, but I've yet to play around with it). So... I'm wondering if the trackers in the KVR community would mind sharing their thoughts on any/all of these progs?
I'm always looking for another great piece of software to add to my arsenal... the most important things to me, after using Renoise and becoming submerged in its community, is ASIO and VST support, as well as a strong commitment from the development team (I just hate the thought of becoming wrapped up in another tracking niche, only for it to dissolve soon thereafter).
Basically... for the very straightforward characteristics I need out of a tracker (things like a solid integrated sampler and automation are just bonuses), is there a better tracker than Renoise out there?
Thanks,
-Tom
-
- Banned
- 590 posts since 20 Jan, 2003
aren't Renoise or Sk@ale enough? ... for what it isTomdini wrote:... for the very straightforward characteristics I need out of a tracker (things like a solid integrated sampler and automation are just bonuses), is there a better tracker than Renoise out there?
i think both are very good, i don't remember how's renoise sampler but remember skales to be some kindva limited, tho quite nice on automations... are you expecting to have a sampler that is a professional editing sample tool or a sampler that is just a sample player?
... tho can allways be an idea to get the companies again temporarily active, energetic, busy
-
- KVRAF
- 7879 posts since 16 Apr, 2003 from -on the outside looking in
Some may laugh, but seriously, ModPlug Tracker is soooo simple, and windows based. It is mod/xm/it/s3m compatible and the tracker I use almost exclusively now: I tend to track melodies and fx and then sequence them in FL5.
Minimal VST support, and I don't know that it is developed any longer, but it is stable and gets the job done quickly.
It's minimal and effective: kind of the hammerhead of the tracker world.
Minimal VST support, and I don't know that it is developed any longer, but it is stable and gets the job done quickly.
It's minimal and effective: kind of the hammerhead of the tracker world.
..what goes around comes around..
-
- Banned
- 590 posts since 20 Jan, 2003
just checking madtracker
http://www.madtracker.org/screenshots.php
MadTracker inside Cubase with ReWire

http://www.madtracker.org/screenshots.php
MadTracker inside Cubase with ReWire
-
- KVRist
- 91 posts since 11 Jan, 2005
-
- KVRian
- 509 posts since 3 Aug, 2002 from berlin
The youngest player in the game is BeRo Tracker, still early alpha, but check it out, it might be your thing.
And then there's reViSiT, that's basicly a spiced-up IT2 as VST plugin.
And then there's reViSiT, that's basicly a spiced-up IT2 as VST plugin.
ngfnjhte?
-
- Banned
- 590 posts since 20 Jan, 2003
both suck my p2 500, bero tracker doesn't even let me load it... and i don't plan to upgraderokkon wrote:The youngest player in the game is BeRo Tracker, still early alpha, but check it out, it might be your thing.
And then there's reViSiT, that's basicly a spiced-up IT2 as VST plugin.
-
- KVRAF
- 1954 posts since 15 Nov, 2003 from London, UK
I've been a tracker user for 10 years or so, admittedly a bit more irregular lately, but my honest opinion is that Renoise is by far the best tracker at the moment.
That said, Aodix looks to be a pretty decent alternative and one i haven't tried if i'm honest.
Of the current lot though renoise is by far the most complete, the most well supported and in active development so can only get better.
its also a total bargain at $45 given that it can do 99% of what "traditional" sequencers can do, especially if you bolt in something like EnergyXT to give it those extra "traditional" sequencer capabilities.
That said, Aodix looks to be a pretty decent alternative and one i haven't tried if i'm honest.
Of the current lot though renoise is by far the most complete, the most well supported and in active development so can only get better.
its also a total bargain at $45 given that it can do 99% of what "traditional" sequencers can do, especially if you bolt in something like EnergyXT to give it those extra "traditional" sequencer capabilities.
- KVRist
- 490 posts since 21 Jun, 2002 from Hamburg
after climbing the latter via sidmon, protracker and fasttracker II i think i found my home until the end of days. buzztracker is my weapon of choice since 5-6 years, its modularity is still unbeaten. the second thing that makes me love it are the machine developers around it. whenever i need a machine i find somebody to write it
last not least the vst support is dope (hrhr).

i bet my second choice would be renoise for the sake of ft2 feeling.
i bet my second choice would be renoise for the sake of ft2 feeling.
aka rktic. demoscener (Farbrausch, Holon, MFX, Still), sound designer, ux-dude, sth @AudioRealism, human synthesizer—not necessarily in that order.
-
- KVRAF
- 1954 posts since 15 Nov, 2003 from London, UK
I heard a track of yours recently ronny, very impressive and you obviously know how to use buzz.Ronny Pries wrote:after climbing the latter via sidmon, protracker and fasttracker II i think i found my home until the end of days. buzztracker is my weapon of choice since 5-6 years, its modularity is still unbeaten. the second thing that makes me love it are the machine developers around it. whenever i need a machine i find somebody to write itlast not least the vst support is dope (hrhr).
![]()
![]()
i bet my second choice would be renoise for the sake of ft2 feeling.
Out of curiosity though, do you ever have stability issues? One thing that seems to have dogged buzz for a few years is the lack of active development since the source was lost and its stability issues.
I always used to get more done with buzz than any other host a few years ago, maybe i should ty it again!
- KVRist
- 490 posts since 21 Jun, 2002 from Hamburg
thanks a lot.I heard a track of yours recently ronny, very impressive and you obviously know how to use buzz.
the host itself doesn't cause crashes, only bugged machines may cause instability issues. it's not that easy sorting those out that may crash buzz since those vary from installation to installation. apart from that the machine interface lets machine developers do any kind of weird stuff with the host (i.e. the peermachines). it would have been nice to get an undo button, but well - it also works withoutOut of curiosity though, do you ever have stability issues? One thing that seems to have dogged buzz for a few years is the lack of active development since the source was lost and its stability issues.
i could zip my installation and send it to you since its quite stable.I always used to get more done with buzz than any other host a few years ago, maybe i should ty it again!
ronny
aka rktic. demoscener (Farbrausch, Holon, MFX, Still), sound designer, ux-dude, sth @AudioRealism, human synthesizer—not necessarily in that order.
-
- KVRian
- 1214 posts since 2 Jun, 2004 from Québec, CANADA
Tomdini wrote: is there a better tracker than Renoise out there?
Hello! haven't tried Renoise yet, but will sometime... I am actively using Buzz for a year now, among other programs, and I am still impressed by what I can do with it. In fact I am debating if it is not the best audio tool ever.
It has been substancially improved with Peer control machines, good VST/VSTi support, and I just discovered liveJUMP tool, witch permits you to jump from looped section to another live using MIDI notes...
Took me a while to learn, never done trackers before... still want to try Renoise, Aeodix, Plogue Bidule... all seem very powerfull too.
