This has got nothing to do with any sort of degree, all you have to do is just:hink wrote:when you show me your degree in electronics than you can attack my position.
- listen and
- look at what is common sense/practice.
I never doubted that.To clairify the vast majority of the desired tube distortion is derived from the pre-amp stage.
Adviced?However it is not advised to push power tubes (but go ahead if you want) to the point of overdrive.
So, why in the world do those little VHTs exist?
Why would any rock band recording an album crank up their amps as hard as possible (to a certain amount at least)?
Why? Please tell me why!
In theory you're right. Tubes ARE inconsistent and you would allways prefer a reproduceable PA behaviour, no matter what the level is. That's why solid state amps *would* be great.It is much better (imo) to run a consistant power amp and tubes are extremely inconsistant.
So much for the theory - it's just that it lacks of any common sense when it comes to "great" guitar sounds.
In theory, it was never meant that a guitar should sound distorted. Yet, Duane Eddy penetrated his speaker cones with a screwdriver because he liked the buzz.
In theory, it was never meant amps should distort. But, more or less by accident, early rockn rollers had to play big audiences without any further house PAs. So their VOX'es and whatever had to be cranked up.
And, even if in theory the VOX wasn't designed to saturate/distort, it just did - and these days it's one of *the* famous guitar tones.
In theory, it was never meant preamps should distort.
Yet, Mr.Clapton (at least he's somewhat known for this) cabled the speaker out (yes!) of a Fender Champ to his Marshall's guitar in.
After that the cultivation of preamp overdrive (back in those days basically done by stomp boxes) started.
In theory it was wrong though.
There goes all your theory!
That is why Marshall came out with hybrids
Yeah, the Valvstate ones - they were cheap and offered a relatively broad palette of sounds - that's why they were sold.
When have you seen/heard one of those in a top production? Right, never! Because based on "good" guitar sounds, they are utter shite. I owned one, so I know what I'm talking about. Nice working horse for small commercial gigs, pure POS for anything else.
Easy: Because the preamp was shit. Utter shit. I tried one of those and couldn't believe.But remember the one that was a solid state pre and a tube power amp (I forget the model, it was a head 30-35 watts)..it was to date probably the biggest flop in the history of Marshall...why do you suppose that is?
You are not getting away with any of your nonsense theories just by these two examples - because they actually don't prove anything.
Now you're really talking more and more nonsense.I will say that when you said your power tubes were not microphonic I kinda dismissed everything you said after that because that's not true. It may not be noticable but it is there. I don't think you really understand tubes and their attributes.
I KNOW that tubes are microphonic - but that has got NOTHING to do with them saturating.
If you really stay with that point, it's absolutely making no sense to continue this discussion, because that's utter nonsense.
And, no matter how you put it, on a well crafted tube amp, with well produced and well biased tubes, there should be close to no microphony happening, not even when you knock on them tubes.
Yeah, but you seem to get away fine with a sound I'd call mediocre at best. At least judging from the guitar sound on your tunes.For me I want the same control over my sound at 1000 watts (if I ever needed it) that I have at 10 watts.
Again a fine example - not!When I got my Marshall tube pre I got that monster Marshall tube power amp (it cost a fortune) and I didn't like it,
Those Marshall power amps were shite.
Very often the combination of preamp and extra poweamp doesn't work well.
The best sounds are coming from integrated solutions. A head or combo with pre- and poweramp, build to match each other fine.
FWIW, I have never been a fanatic at all.The funny thing is there was a guy just like me when I was a stead fast tube fanatic and he said trust me you'll go solid state oneday...I guess if I ever see him I'll be eating some crow...
I have been trying almost everything.
the list of setpus I owned would probably be endless, here's just some of them:
- A straight JCM 800, along with some stomp boxes. A sound I TRULY miss.
- An enormous amount of rack based solutions, one of them running the first programmable tube head ever (by Dynacord), through some power load (Tom Scholz), then into some effects, a line mixer, a 2x200 solid state PA, etc etc etc. Most of those setups sounded shite because the stereo stuff messed it all up.
- 3 way setups of different sorts. Dry amp (a Boogie Mark II back then) running into some 2x12 enclosure, the splitted power amp signal running into a rack with all sorts of FX and then into a solid state stereo PA feeding 2 single 12" enclosures. That actually was a great setup, even with tons of effects you still had the dry sound - but the FOH dudes allways killed me ("Are you fuckíng crazy, 3 channels for the guitarist?"), plus it was tough carrying all that shit and cabling it.
- A whole bunch of smaller "convenience" amps, such as the Valvestate, a Fender Super 75 (?!? I don't even remember that one), etc.
- A VOX AC30 with some stompboxes. Great sound too, but I sold it because I wanted something more modern. Call me an idiot.
- A fullrange system, running a rack, a Mesa Quad preamp, a few effects and finally some ADA amp cab simulator for the dry part of the sound, all that running into some stereo solid state PA and some 12/3 fullrange cabs. I was thinking fullrange would do great with both acoustic guitars and MIDI guitars as well. Just that any plain guitar sound was shit.
- A Marshall 3 channel amp. Don't even remember the name - their first MIDi switchable model. Full tube, but boy was the sound shite.
As you can see, I've fooled around with about any possible combination of amps and configurations.
Now, what am I back at these days? A Twin and a Boogie Mark IV (used alternatively, but I will sell the Twin soon), running together with a few stompboxes.
I will probably expand the Boogie setup a bit this year (MIDI switching and a small rack), but that's about it.
And, to bring things back on topic a bit: I am making extensive use of the Boogie's power amp features. Tweed mode actually isn't all that bad, especially for bluesy stuff.