PLParEQ1?

[nuffink]

There seems to be mainly dissing going on, but why?

Because people hate it when they're turned over and they lash out incoherently when somebody points it out.

yeah, but it likely has nothing to do with this wonderful new plugin. or why such a hate war?

Well, to understand that you'll have to read the thread.
You could do worse than start here.

[Stairsteps]

I couldn't be arsed to read thru this whole thread. There seems to be mainly dissing going on, but why?

So what the site is extremely technical and you won't understand it, or maybe you think the UI sucks arse. Or maybe you just can't hear what this thing does with the soundblaster live and sony consumer headphones you got.


The only thing that matters is the sound.

And this is by far the best neutral digital plugin EQ I've heard to date. It uses extreme amounts of CPU, and that's why products similar to this all use propietary DSP chips. One peticular product that comes to mind is the weiss EQ. yeh, it costs around 8 grand, but the sound is almost too similar.


I'm having a lot of fun feeding this thing all my test material. I can't believe they released this thing free. Even one band of weiss quality is worth £$£$!

Err i think your dissin too so dont be a hipocrite ok, lol this whole thing is funny. However I did try the bloody thing and its good real good you just have to know how to work it, is what she said lol.

However for Eq I still will go with my Ozone3 period nuff ink said.

[Kingston]

well I suppose I did, but it seemed like a good place for a counter attack.

but the truth is this EQ sounds excellent

[Stairsteps]

well I suppose I did, but it seemed like a good place for a counter attack.

hehe np man just pointing it out to you how you did the rope-a-dope hehehe slick move however

[bmanic]

Well, to understand that you'll have to read the thread.
You could do worse than start here.

Nuffink, how does that have anything to do with this single band EQ? The company seems to be keen on proving that the corrective eq for the balancing of the the frequencies that the ear hears badly because of damage has to be of the highest quality, and it sure is.

..

[nuffink]

Well, to understand that you'll have to read the thread.
You could do worse than start here.

Nuffink, how does that have anything to do with this single band EQ? The company seems to be keen on proving that the corrective eq for the balancing of the the frequencies that the ear hears badly because of damage has to be of the highest quality, and it sure is.

..

No. It isn't. It's a joke. And it sounds like one.

[Kingston]

Well, to understand that you'll have to read the thread.
You could do worse than start here.

Nuffink, how does that have anything to do with this single band EQ? The company seems to be keen on proving that the corrective eq for the balancing of the the frequencies that the ear hears badly because of damage has to be of the highest quality, and it sure is.

..

No. It isn't. It's a joke. And it sounds like one.

You just jumped headfirst into an empty pool.

[nuffink]

Well, to understand that you'll have to read the thread.
You could do worse than start here.

Nuffink, how does that have anything to do with this single band EQ? The company seems to be keen on proving that the corrective eq for the balancing of the the frequencies that the ear hears badly because of damage has to be of the highest quality, and it sure is.

..

No. It isn't. It's a joke. And it sounds like one.

You just jumped headfirst into an empty pool.

I agree. It's a truly dumb thing to say.
It also happens to be as valid as anyone else's opinion.
Which is why I never post my subjective views, unless I have a point to prove. Which you helped me with quite nicely.

Ta.

[zck]

I can post a max Q peak rise of a bunch of eqs if anyone's interested. i've got sonalksis eq, tc md3 and plp hooked up. Sonalksis is undeniably good track eq and tc undeniably good mastering eq.

[Kingston]

Well, to understand that you'll have to read the thread.
You could do worse than start here.

Nuffink, how does that have anything to do with this single band EQ? The company seems to be keen on proving that the corrective eq for the balancing of the the frequencies that the ear hears badly because of damage has to be of the highest quality, and it sure is.

..

No. It isn't. It's a joke. And it sounds like one.

You just jumped headfirst into an empty pool.

I agree. It's a truly dumb thing to say.
It also happens to be as valid as anyone else's opinion.
Which is why I never post my subjective views, unless I have a point to prove. Which you helped me with quite nicely.

Ta.

I think if you ever had a point it was lost somewhere between the second and the fourth personal attack in this thread. I only came in during the seventh.

Don't bother trying to clarify. You already tied yourself into a neat little knot.

I just wish there was a way to get this thread back on track.

...which, by the way, is that that this EQ's sound absolutely shines. and the technical crap they post is actually truthful.

[bmanic]

I sure hope Christian of posifhopit fame checks out this EQ and all the information provided on that RAL site. Wouldn't mind having this sort of quality included in the Electri-Q eq! For mastering it really doesn't matter if the latency is high (as long as it's less than half a second or so!) or the CPU usage over 50% as long as the quality is there. I still vividly remeber the embarrasing Weiss episode at the tonmeister messe last year: ".. hmm, this EQ doesn't seem to be working" Daniel Weiss (who overheard me): "Sure it is, try bypassing it and listen to the low sustained note from the viola", Me: ".. eh, what viola?", Daniel Weiss: "Exactly!"

I was trying to listen to the obvious artefacts that I've been accustomed to hear when using EQs and when those artefacts were gone I got seriously confused and forgot to listen to what the EQ actually did, it basically removed the viola in that classical music string quartet recording.

Anyways, I sure as hell will be looking very much forward to what RAL comes up with. This EQ is damn impressive. Just wish they'd fix this 1 band freebie so that we can load more instances of it than one without crashing the host.

Cheers!
bManic

[nuffink]

Well, to understand that you'll have to read the thread.
You could do worse than start here.

Nuffink, how does that have anything to do with this single band EQ? The company seems to be keen on proving that the corrective eq for the balancing of the the frequencies that the ear hears badly because of damage has to be of the highest quality, and it sure is.

..

No. It isn't. It's a joke. And it sounds like one.

You just jumped headfirst into an empty pool.

I agree. It's a truly dumb thing to say.
It also happens to be as valid as anyone else's opinion.
Which is why I never post my subjective views, unless I have a point to prove. Which you helped me with quite nicely.

Ta.

I think if you ever had a point it was lost somewhere between the second and the fourth personal attack in this thread. I only came in during the seventh.

Don't bother trying to clarify. You already tied yourself into a neat little knot.

I just wish there was a way to get this thread back on track.

...which, by the way, is that that this EQ's sound absolutely shines. and the technical crap they post is actually truthful.

Ok. I'll try again because, up until this post, you didn't come across like the other idiots.

I have an opinion on this plugin in the same way that I have an opinion on many others.

That opinion is obviously subjective. In exactly the same way as yours is.

Now, this may come as a shock, but I genuinely don't give a shit for your opinion. Or anbody else's.

The flip side of this is that I assume you don't give a shit about mine, so I don't offer it.

My argument with this disgusting bunch of scam artists has nothing to do with their abililty with a compiler.

[zck]

Well, to understand that you'll have to read the thread.
You could do worse than start here.

Nuffink, how does that have anything to do with this single band EQ? The company seems to be keen on proving that the corrective eq for the balancing of the the frequencies that the ear hears badly because of damage has to be of the highest quality, and it sure is.

..

No. It isn't. It's a joke. And it sounds like one.

buba, i think everyone can see without your help that the the company and their products are fishy. Besides spending keeps economy goin'. If somebody wants to spend $1500 on dubious hearing aid i'd say let them.

[nuffink]

Mixed doubles

[Kingston]

My argument with this disgusting bunch of scam artists has nothing to do with their abililty with a compiler.

What's the scam here? The EQ does what it says on the tin. And if they're going to charge thousands for it, it's actually worth it when you think from the perspective of weiss and algorithmix.

This is no ihsan or some crap default template based synthedit creation!

I have to say they really f**ked everything up with that site of theirs. It looked fishy from the get go.

But the sound was one of the good suprises of these last weeks.