PLParEQ1?

[bobby yarrow]

Stumbled on this today: http://refinedaudiometrics.com/pages/14/index.htm

Found no hits for PLParEQ1 here. Then I noticed it was released yesterday.

Phase-lin EQ always most welcome. I'm a little concerned about its latency reporting tho. From the User Guide:

"Presently, on startup, PLParEQ1 notifies the VST host of a throughput delay of 256
samples, corresponding to Quality = 1, for SR 44.1/48 kHz. While we attempt to
notify the VST host whenever these delays change, that notifications appears to be
ignored."

They report that, at higher quality settings and higher samplerates, the latency can be as high as 8192 samples. If it's only successfully reporting 256 sample delay, well, that's a problem . . .

[bobby yarrow]

Whoops. Just noticed that the 'brilliant new free EQ plugin' identified 3 posts down is the PLParEQ1. Just doesn't have the name of the plugin in it . . .

[greendoor]

Would probably be best used for offline processing anyway. I'll have to try it - but I'm hoping I can tweak at Quality level 1, and then render at Quality level 5, which they say would be too much for most PC's anyway. Very interesting ...

[Frippertronix]

The info on their site is enticing. I grabbed it but I'll have to get off work to try it. Sounds unique from the description, at least. Nice to see somewhat aiming at very high quality in an EQ---much needed in VST land, IMO.

[Frippertronix]

BTW, I emailed them about the release of their full EQ (10 band para, CPU "optimized", to whatever extent that's possible here). I'll post it here when they let me know some details.

[omo]

prerings like crazy whatever they write there

[Frippertronix]

Write where?

[omo]

In description. It sounds like less preringing occurs in Phase Warped mode, but it really doesn't sound much better to me then the Phase Linear mode because from what I'm hearing here it somewhat lowers eq gain. It is easier to hear in extreme boost settings - preringing grows but the actual signal boost disappears.

[Ben [KVR]]

BTW, I emailed them about the release of their full EQ (10 band para, CPU "optimized", to whatever extent that's possible here). I'll post it here when they let me know some details.

I received a reply. It's not going to be cheap! Four figures at least - not really your typical KVR members price range )

[nuffink]

BTW, I emailed them about the release of their full EQ (10 band para, CPU "optimized", to whatever extent that's possible here). I'll post it here when they let me know some details.

I received a reply. It's not going to be cheap! Four figures at least - not really your typical KVR members price range )

Looks like we're in zeb-land again.

[opia]

I'll just have to stick with my other EQs

sigh

[JonnySun 2.0]

Hm, this eq crashes my cubase sx 1.06 under WinXP

[vista]

Hm, this eq crashes my cubase sx 1.06 under WinXP

... and crashes vsthost 1.35
under windows ...

[zck]

BTW, I emailed them about the release of their full EQ (10 band para, CPU "optimized", to whatever extent that's possible here). I'll post it here when they let me know some details.

I received a reply. It's not going to be cheap! Four figures at least - not really your typical KVR members price range )

Looks like we're in zeb-land again.

There's nothing like starting a day with clever and funny rebuttal, eh nuffy ? Lemme have some fun too.. It begs to point out that zeb land should be close to gaga land where your chords for dummies plugin resides.

I see that the tormented soul of your can not stand the notion that something costs more than a few bucks. This will undoubtedly shock you: anyone who does mastering for a living will pay 4 figures for a very high quality eq without much thinking.

Whether this is indeed a top notch eq I'm not qualified to tell. It does sound clean and defined. The ringing someone mentioned earlier is probably unusually steep Q.

[robenestobenz]

zeb-land?