That would be kind of like sticking your fingers in your ears and going "lalalala it didn't happen" while it does not change the reality. The same kind of stupid like when the US Gov prohibited their employees reading about documents leaked to Wikileaks on the net while all the major publications continued to publish them every day. It's pretty easy for anyone to find out regardless.Sampleconstruct wrote:I don't think it's a very good idea to mention more companies which have been cracked, in this thread.
Ilok busted?
-
- KVRAF
- 2648 posts since 20 Jun, 2012
No signature here!
-
Sampleconstruct Sampleconstruct https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=191286
- KVRAF
- 16749 posts since 12 Oct, 2008 from Here and there
-
- KVRAF
- 2070 posts since 5 Oct, 2005
Yes, the info file was credible.It accompanied one of the cracked versions of Cubase.chk071 wrote: And that sounds like a credible information to you?
This isn't the only place it was discussed.I only mentioned it was posted here so that anyone interested could search for it.
-
- KVRAF
- 2070 posts since 5 Oct, 2005
Aye, was something like that. was never a Cubase SX user but I remember all the kerfuffle it caused.Compyfox wrote: I remember this. I think the accusation/think tank was that the random access to the USB key was throttling the performance. Didn't experience this however - or at least not with full awareness.
-
- KVRAF
- 2070 posts since 5 Oct, 2005
Why would you care how much something costs when your buying with stolen credit cards ?Compyfox wrote: "Warez groups" are in need of source material. We pretty much understand the concept. But riddle me this... why invest hundreds of USD for a hard to crack plugin, if alternatives (decent priced even) are easier to access?
.
|You pay nothing and don't have to register the plug with your own name and address.
- u-he
- 30206 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Yep. All we do though is give away some ideas with a few surprising elements. People then have to implement their own scheme, hopefully based on those ideas. It's like a cookbook. That is part of the strategy: The more different (but indeterminably strong) protections there are, the less likely a landslide release like this one, the better off the industry.billcarroll wrote:I'm pretty sure u-he gives their copy protection scheme away for free to other devs. Or, that's at least what I remember reading at some point.V0RT3X wrote:If this is a joke, i don't think it's appropriate, especially given the current circumstances. U-he would'nt sink that low.robotmonkey wrote:
Actually maybe it was Urs. He had some negative things to say about PACE and AAX in this very same thread. And I'm sure that now he could sell his own copy protection with even heftier price tag than PACE.
Unfortunately, all copy protection can be cracked. No copy protection is immune if the hackers are willing to spend the time and effort.
And no, we don't make any money from it. That would be counterproductive and I'd hate myself.
Btw. one needs to be cracked in order to make a good copy protection.
-
- Banned
- 454 posts since 30 Apr, 2013
So, how are you going to react to the fact that all your plugins have been cracked recently? Write a new cookbook?Urs wrote:Yep. All we do though is give away some ideas with a few surprising elements. People then have to implement their own scheme, hopefully based on those ideas. It's like a cookbook. That is part of the strategy: The more different (but indeterminably strong) protections there are, the less likely a landslide release like this one, the better off the industry.billcarroll wrote:I'm pretty sure u-he gives their copy protection scheme away for free to other devs. Or, that's at least what I remember reading at some point.V0RT3X wrote:If this is a joke, i don't think it's appropriate, especially given the current circumstances. U-he would'nt sink that low.robotmonkey wrote:
Actually maybe it was Urs. He had some negative things to say about PACE and AAX in this very same thread. And I'm sure that now he could sell his own copy protection with even heftier price tag than PACE.
Unfortunately, all copy protection can be cracked. No copy protection is immune if the hackers are willing to spend the time and effort.
And no, we don't make any money from it. That would be counterproductive and I'd hate myself.
Btw. one needs to be cracked in order to make a good copy protection.
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
- Banned
- 3490 posts since 6 Sep, 2007 from France
Really curious about this famous time bomb , what s'happen ? I have read somewhere the GUI change but i never seen a screenshot of it.someone know where i can see a screenshot ?
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
- u-he
- 30206 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Firstly, you didn't read my post properly. Getting cracked is part of the strategy. That's also described in the cookbook.toothnclaw wrote:So, how are you going to react to the fact that all your plugins have been cracked recently? Write a new cookbook?Urs wrote:Btw. one needs to be cracked in order to make a good copy protection.
Secondly, the cracks are remarkably good. They used an angle that I hadn't thought of, but they didn't fully remove the copy protection. It takes a bit longer to set off and it doesn't let us track busts, but we've seen promising posts on forums.
Plus, we've analysed the new angle and it took me 2 hours to take it out. They'll need a few months to figure this out, and they need a completely new angle - which brings us back to point 1: Copy protection is an iterative process.
-
- KVRAF
- 14739 posts since 19 Oct, 2003 from Berlin, Germany
You definitely got a point here.Acid Mitch wrote:Why would you care how much something costs when your buying with stolen credit cards ?
|You pay nothing and don't have to register the plug with your own name and address.
Though I do remember (from beta forum talk) that one "group" is actually buying the stuff, then cracking it. And if they're successful, also distributing it. So cracking code is definitely both a challenge and a sport to these people (and as Urs just commented on, it can even be very beneficial!). Just like finding flaws in other security systems (at least over here in the Central EU - the RFID "exploits" and "backdoors" come to mind - the old Chaos Computer Club made people aware of this).
I've never experienced the "time bomb" myself as legit U-HE user. But I've seen screenshots and read a lot of stories about it. Melted GUI, random changed parameters, internal "detuning", etc. Urs wrote several lengthy post about this many months ago in his own sub-forum.hivkorn wrote:Really curious about this famous time bomb , what s'happen ? I have read somewhere the GUI change but i never seen a screenshot of it.someone know where i can see a screenshot ?
Some of these comments were even hilarious to read.
-
- Banned
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
- KVRAF
- 25849 posts since 20 Jan, 2008 from a star near where you are
Does he work for FoxNews?OP wrote:Don't know if it's for real, but a mate told me it's just been defeated.
Giggles
Last edited by Numanoid on Tue Dec 22, 2015 8:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
