Synthmaster for $10
-
- KVRAF
- 5851 posts since 9 Jul, 2002 from Helsinki
150 is not unreasonable price for a solid, unique instrument that will last for years and years and which can be expected to be updated for future operation systems and VST standards. Not many such VSTis have been released so far.
- KVRAF
- 22863 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
Urs, I get what you're saying and I'm not even arguing it from a technical standpoint. But for me, when I think of getting a "modular" synth, I want to be able to go to 40 different online stores and buy 200 different "modules" and stick them together any way I like. That to me is the ultimate modular software synth and we simply don't have that yet.Urs wrote:I call it modular.wagtunes wrote:I can't add any. I can't add any LFOs. I can't add anything. You want to call it semi modular?
The definition of a modular synthesizer is "a synthesizer that consists of independent modules which have a free signal routing". The definition of a semi-modular synthesizer is "a synthesizer that consists of independent modules which have a preset signal routing that can be altered to some degree".
A definition that includes "seemingly unlimited number of modules" has never existed, it's just a feature that some software synthesizers offer. Otherwise Moog would have offered their System 55 as "preset component for modular synthesizers" rather than "modular synthesizer". Sure, one could patch from one Moog Modular to another, one could even swap some modules. But that was not the gist of it being modular, it was just another feature.
The distinction between modular and semi modular was made specifically to describe the difference of pre-wired modular synthesizers such as Arp 2600 and modulars like the Moog ones which were not pre-wired.
Don't get me wrong. I love Zebra 2. I love Bazille. But both those synths, as far as being modular or semi modular goes, have limitations as to what I can do with them. I get that this doesn't make them not modular or not semi modular. But they are simply not totally open ended.
That's the software synth I'm waiting for because I can't afford hardware nor do I have the room for a humongous Euro Crack system.
You design something like that and I'll be the first person in line to buy it.
- KVRAF
- 5377 posts since 25 Jan, 2014 from The End of The World as We Knowit
I would never have spent $80 on Synthmaster because she's not my type. But $10 is a cheap date, so I said OK. And I found things that I really enjoy, like her cool modularity....
F E E D
Y O U R
F L O W
Y O U R
F L O W
-
- KVRAF
- 5851 posts since 9 Jul, 2002 from Helsinki
I'm very happy with Blocks and the fact that there's hundreds and hundreds of free modules downloadable from a single location. Blocks lack the immediacy of virtual patch cables on the panels, but on the other hand the Reaktor environment allows infinitely more powerful patching.wagtunes wrote: Urs, I get what you're saying and I'm not even arguing it from a technical standpoint. But for me, when I think of getting a "modular" synth, I want to be able to go to 40 different online stores and buy 200 different "modules" and stick them together any way I like. That to me is the ultimate modular software synth and we simply don't have that yet.

Well Bazille isn't really a modular synth by any stretch of the word. It's a patchable synth, a semi-modular.Don't get me wrong. I love Zebra 2. I love Bazille. But both those synths, as far as being modular or semi modular goes, have limitations as to what I can do with them. I get that this doesn't make them not modular or not semi modular. But they are simply not totally open ended.
-
- KVRian
- 882 posts since 22 May, 2013 from Gent, Belgium
no download yet, did somebody have success?
My sounddesign: Synth1/Ex5/D-50 patches https://goo.gl/zE3pkk
My stuff: W10x64i7 15" laptop, Reaper/Cantabile3+Synth1+Avenger on stage+NordStage2+Samson Graphite 49
Loving new VPS Avenger! Check my skins! https://goo.gl/MBNJHj
My stuff: W10x64i7 15" laptop, Reaper/Cantabile3+Synth1+Avenger on stage+NordStage2+Samson Graphite 49
Loving new VPS Avenger! Check my skins! https://goo.gl/MBNJHj
- KVRAF
- 22863 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
I'm aware that Bazille is not a modular synth..jon wrote:I'm very happy with Blocks and the fact that there's hundreds and hundreds of free modules downloadable from a single location. Blocks lack the immediacy of virtual patch cables on the panels, but on the other hand the Reaktor environment allows infinitely more powerful patching.wagtunes wrote: Urs, I get what you're saying and I'm not even arguing it from a technical standpoint. But for me, when I think of getting a "modular" synth, I want to be able to go to 40 different online stores and buy 200 different "modules" and stick them together any way I like. That to me is the ultimate modular software synth and we simply don't have that yet.
Well Bazille isn't really a modular synth by any stretch of the word. It's a patchable synth, a semi-modular.Don't get me wrong. I love Zebra 2. I love Bazille. But both those synths, as far as being modular or semi modular goes, have limitations as to what I can do with them. I get that this doesn't make them not modular or not semi modular. But they are simply not totally open ended.
As far as Reaktor goes, what has really turned me off on blocks has nothing to do with blocks. It's Reaktor in general. Reaktor 5 is a royal headache to try to do anything with. You literally need an engineering degree to put things together and I just don't have the patience for that level of programming. Softube is more my speed.
So when blocks came out, my contempt for Reaktor in general was just too much for me to even bother looking at blocks more than just downloading the player, toying with it for about 5 minutes and then deleting it from my drive. Don't even remember why I didn't like it. Don't care.
I use Reaktor as a preset machine. I pull up whatever ensemble I need and then program my patch how I want it, like I do with a traditional synth. That's my speed. Not Xor's or whatever. I have zero patience for that crap.
- Banned
- 3490 posts since 6 Sep, 2007 from France
+1 softube is less hard to understand than reaktor ...Reaktor could be huge , but it need to have a graphic connection like softube have.You literally need an engineering degree to put things together and I just don't have the patience for that level of programming. Softube is more my speed
- KVRAF
- 8096 posts since 13 Jan, 2003 from Darkest Kent, UK
loads of people.godly wrote:no download yet, did somebody have success?
- Banned
- 3490 posts since 6 Sep, 2007 from France
GaryG wrote:loads of people.godly wrote:no download yet, did somebody have success?
i think we have to wait again ...i think this sale was a rush and GC need time to deliver serial...
- KVRAF
- 8096 posts since 13 Jan, 2003 from Darkest Kent, UK
I'm not so sure, I like the separation of the panel and the connectors. Once it's all plugged up then nothing to distract you. Wiring just an F10 away.hivkorn wrote:+1 softube is less hard to understand than reaktor ...Reaktor could be huge , but it need to have a graphic connection like softube have.You literally need an engineering degree to put things together and I just don't have the patience for that level of programming. Softube is more my speed
And you don't 'literally' need an engineering degree; the core side of things gets pretty DSPey but you can do so much just with primary modules etc, no harder than any modular (stick a modular in front of any pleb in the street and you'll get similar "engineering" comments
- KVRAF
- 22863 posts since 8 Oct, 2014
Maybe Reaktor 6 with blocks is easier to patch together, ala Softube, but like I said, I was so turned off by Reaktor 5 that I'm unlikely to upgrade to 6.GaryG wrote:I'm not so sure, I like the separation of the panel and the connectors. Once it's all plugged up then nothing to distract you. Wiring just an F10 away.hivkorn wrote:+1 softube is less hard to understand than reaktor ...Reaktor could be huge , but it need to have a graphic connection like softube have.You literally need an engineering degree to put things together and I just don't have the patience for that level of programming. Softube is more my speed
And you don't 'literally' need an engineering degree; the core side of things gets pretty DSPey but you can do so much just with primary modules etc, no harder than any modular (stick a modular in front of any pleb in the street and you'll get similar "engineering" comments)
Oh, and I just did open the demo mode of 6. The few ensembles they give you, most are auto run sequencers. The couple that aren't sound good but nothing that blew me away enough to shell out the $99 upgrade cost for.
Somebody blow me away with Reaktor 6 and I'm likely to change my mind.
So far, nobody's come close.
-
- KVRian
- 609 posts since 29 Jan, 2004
Nope. Nothing yet and they have taken payment from PayPal. I'm not happy.godly wrote:no download yet, did somebody have success?
Anyone not in the US?GaryG wrote:loads of people.godly wrote:no download yet, did somebody have success?
- Banned
- 3490 posts since 6 Sep, 2007 from France
GaryG wrote:I'm not so sure, I like the separation of the panel and the connectors. Once it's all plugged up then nothing to distract you. Wiring just an F10 away.hivkorn wrote:+1 softube is less hard to understand than reaktor ...Reaktor could be huge , but it need to have a graphic connection like softube have.You literally need an engineering degree to put things together and I just don't have the patience for that level of programming. Softube is more my speed
And you don't 'literally' need an engineering degree; the core side of things gets pretty DSPey but you can do so much just with primary modules etc, no harder than any modular (stick a modular in front of any pleb in the street and you'll get similar "engineering" comments)
yep don't need engineering degree , but the workflow destroy the creativity during a session...
- KVRian
- 513 posts since 22 Sep, 2015
are you sure?cyberheater wrote: Nope. Nothing yet and they have taken payment from PayPal. I'm not happy.
You submitted an order amounting to $10.00 USD to Guitar Center
Thanks for using PayPal. Please note that this is not a charge. Your account will be charged when the merchant processes your payment. You may receive multiple emails as the merchant processes your order.
Your funds will be transferred when the merchant processes your payment. Any money in your PayPal account at that time will be used before any other payment source.
To see the full transaction details, log in to your PayPal account.
It may take a few moments for this transaction to appear in your account.
Last edited by wickfut on Tue Jan 03, 2017 1:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Banned
- 3490 posts since 6 Sep, 2007 from France
cyberheater wrote:Nope. Nothing yet and they have taken payment from PayPal. I'm not happy.godly wrote:no download yet, did somebody have success?
Anyone not in the US?GaryG wrote:loads of people.godly wrote:no download yet, did somebody have success?
don't worry i am sure GC are not scamming us
