Nothing. On the contrary, all the words, which have deep-meanings (double-), such as the "mint" are interesting, in my mind.EvilDragon wrote:What did prunes do wrong?
See:
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=prune
Nothing. On the contrary, all the words, which have deep-meanings (double-), such as the "mint" are interesting, in my mind.EvilDragon wrote:What did prunes do wrong?
Wow ! Thx for your great explanation ! As soon i can i will try to beta and surely buy it ....u-he-william wrote:Sure.hivkorn wrote:Can someone explaîn me , what is the difference with the other delays ? (Why bbd delay are special ? )![]()
BBD's aren't "special", they are just one of two common methods to implement a delay in hardware. The other big one is tape. I'll give you the TL;DR answer before going in detail:
BBDs work by speeding up or slowing down the signal in order to create different delay lengths. This speeding up and slowing down has the nice side effect of changing the pitch. So you can modulate the delay length (rate or rate+) without creating ugly artifacts. Instead, the signal simply is pitched up and down.
The technical description:
The usual digital delay uses a delay line with a fixed sample rate (the same you set up in your DAW) and the delay length is then determined by the length of the delay line (number or samples). Analog BBDs use a series of transistors that basically freeze a voltage for a short duration before passing the voltage on to the next transistor pair. (This is where the signal is delayed) However, you can't change the number of transistors used to change the overall delay time. Instead, the rate in which the voltage is passed from one transistor to another is changed. That would be like changing the sample rate in you DAW just to speed up the signal and thus decrease the delay time.
Then they could name two others:ATN69 wrote:Make it a little darker and call it "Deep Purple"
No idea why it would cut out with the VST2 version, but there is a reason for this to happen in the VST3 version.Steve Helstrip wrote:For some reason, the regen/feedback has started cutting out randomly in my Cubase 9.5 session in Cubase, both vst2 and vst3 versions. I'm sure you're onto this, but thought I'd give it a mention. Alas, cannot use as it is...
The idea was to have less similar colours next to each other to create more interesting blends in between the colours.Funkybot's Evil Twin wrote:Was there a technical reason for the colors being where they are? I almost expect them to go from darkest to brightest sounding, which would probably be closer to: Aqua, Yellow, Indigo, Green, Blue (in terms of the "behind the scenes" settings/results - don't care what you actually call each color).
The ducking feature isn't really designed to do what you want. The intention was to allow duck the feedback in order to prevent what Howard fittingly labels "sonic mayhem" in the manual. So it's a feature designed to high-regen scenarios. Might take some convincing in the office in order to add the more common wet-ducking mode.Funkybot's Evil Twin wrote: I'd also second the FR for the more traditional mix-based ducking mode. After some brief usage, I didn't necessarily love the results of the feedback based ducking. Most times I'll want a delay with ducking, I'm going to want some barely audible reverb during vocal passages with louder decays at the end of each line. The current implementation still leaves you with a pretty audible delay during a vocal, which can adversely effect intelligibility.
Another idea, do you maybe have a very small buffer size set for your audio driver, e.g. something like 32 samples? If so, maybe try using a slightly larger buffer size, like 64 or 128 samples.Steve Helstrip wrote:For some reason, the regen/feedback has started cutting out randomly in my Cubase 9.5 session in Cubase, both vst2 and vst3 versions. I'm sure you're onto this, but thought I'd give it a mention. Alas, cannot use as it is...
You don't have to learn or master daw B or C, to make a trackmevla wrote: I will not learn a new DAW when I haven't totally mastered the two I use. You know, I have music to create.
He he, tried that with Tracktion's DAW, because of the attractive comping feature. Can't do anything good w/o getting to learn a few things. And some can be really different.glokraw wrote:You don't have to learn or master daw B or C, to make a trackmevla wrote: I will not learn a new DAW when I haven't totally mastered the two I use. You know, I have music to create.
you'll simply import into daw A. Some killer sound or feature will always be unavailable in whichever daw is 'A'.
It comes with time. And yes, it's important. Same with the synths and plugins. The more someone knows, the more possibilities can be discovered. It's as simple as that. It's possible to just put Colour Copy on a track and turn a knob or two. And it can be just right. But knowing more about it open doors. Same with DAWs.glokraw wrote:Who has time to 'master' a daw(s), when basic tools allow for
making wonderful music? A theme, melody, mood and motion don't require the minutia of a daw, just some soul, the willingness to practice some instrument(s),
and then Gathering A variety of Sounds
From first post in this thread: “Also: We don't have any factory presets for Colour Copy yet - feel free to discover uncharted sonic territory!”Chris-S wrote:Bug?
The installer did not install any presets in my system.
Windows 7 / VST2-32bit.
Not a bug. Just a known quirk for which we didn't implement a workaround yet.drzhnn wrote:Found another little buggy. When the Freeze button is enabled, switching presets empties the audio buffer but keeps the Freeze button on
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026