Repro-5
-
aaron aardvark aaron aardvark https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=248508
- KVRAF
- 3061 posts since 22 Jan, 2011 from near Los Angeles
Ned,
Some nice sounds in there, you lucky son-of-a-gun.
Some nice sounds in there, you lucky son-of-a-gun.
You can hear my original music at this link: https://www.soundclick.com/artist/defau ... dID=224436
- KVRist
- 122 posts since 14 Sep, 2017
Ned, you've done a man's job sir...

There is low end here on Dynaudio BM15A's & AKG 240's.

There is low end here on Dynaudio BM15A's & AKG 240's.
Last edited by synth_punk on Sat Oct 28, 2017 7:05 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Pick Me Pick me!
- 10241 posts since 12 Mar, 2002 from a state of confusion
4 instances stacked, each one taking a different octave. Big Unison Saws.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1xyRO ... sp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1xyRO ... sp=sharing
-
- Pick Me Pick me!
- 10241 posts since 12 Mar, 2002 from a state of confusion
Right now on my computer (i5 4690, Cubase Artist 9) resting state is around 8-10% with no tracks but just Cubase loaded with a new project. Stays the same when I add a Repro5 instance but play no notes, if I then play a note it goes up to 11%, if I hold down 8 notes together I see the CPU jump to 23%.Mutant wrote:How is the CPU per 1 voice and per 8 voices ?
I'm also onboard FX heavy on my test patch.
So around 2-3% CPU for one voice, roughly 15% all 8 voices. There is a 1-2% overhead for each instance it seems too in Cubase.
Please note I'm also running AV, Firewall, and a few other fun things that come with Windows 10 so your mileage certainly will vary. Plus this is a beta version.. so don't make large assumptions just yet.
I will say though I can currently play around 5 instances of 8 voice unison pads before I bottom out the CPU with onboard FX. But higher notes seem to take more CPU load than lower notes.
Yet this is the richest sound I've heard from a soft synth thus far. It really sounds fantastic.
- KVRian
- 592 posts since 15 Dec, 2000 from Montreal, Canada
Are you sure? My reality says differently. I applied an LPF at 100Hz, and there was still some Repro5 bass going on:masterhiggins wrote:Was there a low-cut filter applied at 200Hz? The high end sounds great, but there's nothing in the low end.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
My website: https://www.lesynth.com/
- KVRian
- 592 posts since 15 Dec, 2000 from Montreal, Canada
That's super fat.VitaminD wrote:4 instances stacked, each one taking a different octave. Big Unison Saws.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1xyRO ... sp=sharing
My website: https://www.lesynth.com/
- KVRist
- 479 posts since 13 May, 2012 from Minnesota
Can someone do a low filter sweep, mid, and high with detuned saws? That's always the first thing I do on any synth and it'll tell me right away if the sound works for me.
Thanks
Thanks
- KVRist
- 122 posts since 14 Sep, 2017
[quote
-
- KVRAF
- 16738 posts since 13 Oct, 2009
Yeah, it made my sub rumble...there's bass there.Ned Bouhalassa wrote:Are you sure? My reality says differently. I applied an LPF at 100Hz, and there was still some Repro5 bass going on:masterhiggins wrote:Was there a low-cut filter applied at 200Hz? The high end sounds great, but there's nothing in the low end.
- KVRist
- 234 posts since 24 Apr, 2004 from Patagonia
This!Doc Brown wrote:Can someone do a low filter sweep, mid, and high with detuned saws? That's always the first thing I do on any synth and it'll tell me right away if the sound works for me.
Thanks
-
- Pick Me Pick me!
- 10241 posts since 12 Mar, 2002 from a state of confusion
Hope this helps... this is 8 voice unison, detune at 60%, with the voices panned like a fan.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1xyRO ... sp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1xyRO ... sp=sharing
- KVRAF
- 26953 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
There is a new RePro-5 filter option (Poly) ... plus the ones from RePro-1 as well...hakey wrote:Try the RePro1 demo. It's the same filter (I think?).
This is the 'Rounded' filter model - Osc's set to P5 Old (unique to RePro-5) - some held notes and a filter sweep via filter env with Resonance set to about 50%. No other modulation.
https://draigathar.org/sounds/RePro5-13.mp3
-
- KVRAF
- 5913 posts since 25 Jan, 2007
I love the idea that a beta tester would record a first audio example of an eagerly awaited new synth, and then just strip everything below 200hz before uploading. Because, well, ya know. Reasons.masterhiggins wrote:Was there a low-cut filter applied at 200Hz? The high end sounds great, but there's nothing in the low end.
Good ol' KVR.
http://www.guyrowland.co.uk
http://www.sound-on-screen.com
W11, Ryzen 7900, 64gb RAM, RME Babyface, 1050ti, PT 2024 Ultimate, Cubase Pro 14
Macbook Air M2 OSX 10.15
http://www.sound-on-screen.com
W11, Ryzen 7900, 64gb RAM, RME Babyface, 1050ti, PT 2024 Ultimate, Cubase Pro 14
Macbook Air M2 OSX 10.15
