KVR Audio

quintosardo · Post by **quintosardo** » Tue Mar 28, 2006 10:55 am

Paulie Phonick wrote:Cool idea, quinto! I'd love to try that out (and morph a room into a cathedral into a pocket radio )

One (potential) problem though: as far as I remember, there is a tapent on nydamic nocvolution (sorry for the spelling, trying to avoid googling lawyers ) - are you sure your plugin does not fall under it?

Thanks

I have to test performances with long IRs (like those for reverb). Morphing adds an overhead that could be significative for long IRs...

I don't know about patent. I heard that there are some, but, to be honest, I don't know how they apply to freeware in Italy... here we cannot patent algorithms...

quintosardo · Post by **quintosardo** » Tue Mar 28, 2006 10:57 am

@FaX:

Gwydi · Post by **Gwydi** » Tue Mar 28, 2006 11:02 am

Wow, this is going to be fun!

CinningBao · Post by **CinningBao** » Tue Mar 28, 2006 11:06 am

God, I just want to walk out the office and go make some noises!

Will we have the ability to alter the blocksize of the morphing algo?
I'm also expecting there to quite a significant delay introduced (depending on the block-size of the morphing algo).
One delay for the morph and another for the convolution.. is that right?

quintosardo · Post by **quintosardo** » Tue Mar 28, 2006 11:16 am

CinningBao wrote:God, I just want to walk out the office and go make some noises!

CinningBao wrote:Will we have the ability to alter the blocksize of the morphing algo?
I'm also expecting there to quite a significant delay introduced (depending on the block-size of the morphing algo).
One delay for the morph and another for the convolution.. is that right?

This one is "closed".

Speaking about the general "open" plugin: actually I've set a 512 block size. It is a 512 samples fixed delay. Morphing doesn't add any delay.
Yes, block size should be selectable: short for high cpu/low delay; long for low cpu/high delay

cptgone · Post by **cptgone** » Tue Mar 28, 2006 11:29 am

Cool!

opia · Post by **opia** » Tue Mar 28, 2006 11:38 am

zeoy · Post by **zeoy** » Tue Mar 28, 2006 12:01 pm

You've gone too far Quinto ... and that's great.

quintosardo · Post by **quintosardo** » Tue Mar 28, 2006 12:04 pm

zeoy wrote:You've gone too far Quinto ... and that's great.

This should be great for guitar

Newbie Brad · Post by **Newbie Brad** » Tue Mar 28, 2006 12:13 pm

I am very eager to try this with my fretless electric guitar stuff. I think it's genius. I'm just in awe. Thanks for doing this!

sinkmusic · Post by **sinkmusic** » Tue Mar 28, 2006 12:29 pm

We have to make a presentation about this one.
In fact, it is primary aimed at emulating Filterbank hardware devices, to reach some equalization settings that you can not get with conventionnal eq devices.
The sound should become more coloured, with an almost vocal quality.
But i'v used several gear to make those IR, and it goes far beyond emulation.

runagate · Post by **runagate** » Tue Mar 28, 2006 4:37 pm

Man, oh, man!
I, too, have been hoping just suxh an effect would be created!
Awesome, somply aweseome!
I wish I could spend all day making a demo song to show what I suspect
I could do with your plug-in!

- runagate

spuddle · Post by **spuddle** » Tue Mar 28, 2006 4:43 pm

Looks really neat!

I don't quite understand though, will it morph between two or more different samples? Or is it doing something else?

Spyro · Post by **Spyro** » Tue Mar 28, 2006 5:06 pm

As I see you can morph smoothly between different IRs, not morphing between different samples like on Kyma. (still hope someone does this)

Still interesting, certainly useful.

vurt · Post by **vurt** » Tue Mar 28, 2006 5:08 pm

vurt looks forward to this with great gusto

New "Morphing Convolution" vst engine