Voxengo Gliss EQ & camelphat3
-
- KVRAF
- 2685 posts since 14 Jul, 2005 from Australia
The Kjaerhus stuff is in my opinion the best go-to stuff, Voxengo being a lot more specialised ... the GlissEQ doesn't quite have the flexibility the GEQ has in the low / high cut filters which are very very useful for most tracks.
The Kjaerhus GAC doesn't have these high / low cut filters but is the best channel strip I've ever seen in terms of GUI and sound.
Fots
The Kjaerhus GAC doesn't have these high / low cut filters but is the best channel strip I've ever seen in terms of GUI and sound.
Fots
-
- KVRist
- Topic Starter
- 337 posts since 12 Apr, 2003 from The Greater Atlanta Area
I'm actually considering GAC at this point, the main draw to the voxengo EQ was the fact that I could move EQ points directly on the grid, is this true of the Kjaerhus EQs?
Does GAC use quite a bit of CPU? (even if I only have one effect switched on?)
or is GAC more suitable for mastering than mixing?
Does GAC use quite a bit of CPU? (even if I only have one effect switched on?)
or is GAC more suitable for mastering than mixing?
Pay $1,000 for a sequencer? ummm... no
I'm going to have to disagree with you there...
I'm going to have to disagree with you there...