So... Why aren't you using Reaper?

Audio Plugin Hosts and other audio software applications discussion
Post Reply New Topic

Why aren't you using Reaper?

Poll ended at Sat Jan 12, 2008 9:12 am

The fans
13
3%
The Interface
42
11%
The price
2
1%
The company
2
1%
The audio
1
0%
The midi / midi editor
60
15%
Something not on the list
25
6%
I'm already happy with something else
144
37%
I am a happy Reaper user
53
13%
I am a mostly happy Reaper user
32
8%
Fish
19
5%
 
Total votes: 393

RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

neilpullen wrote:In hindsight that's a lie -- my least favourite thing is that it can't run for longer than 5 minutes without crashing and forcing a system restart :help:

EDIT: Forgot to add. Adding an insert effect is also much easier now with the effect chain display above the mixer tracks.
I like the new mixer too. It makes Reaper a lot more usable. The new v2 look is a lot easier to deal with than the old ACID look too. That mixer looks really familiar BTW. :wink:

Reaper is growing on me. I knew about midi editing and some VST problems but I'm surprised by the number of people with stability issues. humm..

Post

I agree that adding effects is a bit easier now. However, I don't like the new mixer stuff at all really. Better than before, but just not what I would prefer.

Brent
My host is better than your host

Post

There are a lot of things I like about Reaper 2.0 but after much consideration I cant drag myself away from Cubase SE3 because I know it inside out and work fast with it..

Post

[DELETED]

Post

[DELETED]

Post

Does anybody know how tracktion time stretches?

Boy I would love a stable build there. It was mentioned live is time stretch lacking... I totally agree or have not figured out time stretch in live properly yet.

Post

koolkeys wrote:I agree that adding effects is a bit easier now. However, I don't like the new mixer stuff at all really. Better than before, but just not what I would prefer.

Brent
Are you still using T2-3? Still happy? Just curious..

Post

REAPER has to much "update". It is for a short time on business but tons of version numbers. For me REAPER is still beta status. The code is messed up all time. I won't pay one dollar for the crap.

Post

tomg wrote:
koolkeys wrote:I agree that adding effects is a bit easier now. However, I don't like the new mixer stuff at all really. Better than before, but just not what I would prefer.

Brent
Are you still using T2-3? Still happy? Just curious..
Yes, I'm still using T3, but I also use Sonar quite a lot since I got it. Sonar does all the heavy lifting for me and Tracktion is my scratchpad app.

I use both and can't imagine what I'll ever need that they can't do. Tracktion lets me be a musician, and Sonar lets me be an engineer. Great stuff really, and both are as stable as anything has ever been for me, and also more stable than Reaper has been for me, since we're talking about it.

Brent
My host is better than your host

Post

soundpalace wrote: - No high quality time stretching (e.g. MPEX, Radius)
um what?? the timestretching algos in reaper are at least 5 times better and faster than in cubase :?
Image

Post

ttoz wrote: I agree with everything in your post except the timestretching quality is quite superb now and reaper is one of only 2 apps ont he market using elastique pro..
Out of curiousity, which is the other one?

Post

lotus2035 wrote:There are a lot of things I like about Reaper 2.0 but after much consideration I cant drag myself away from Cubase SE3 because I know it inside out and work fast with it..
Yeah I get that too. Reaper always makes me feel like I'm driving a tank. I can get it done but it seems like a lot of work compared to just about anything else. Does Reaper have the worst midi editing ever? And is there any way to save it outside of cloning Cubase?

Post

masukie wrote:REAPER has to much "update". It is for a short time on business but tons of version numbers. For me REAPER is still beta status. The code is messed up all time. I won't pay one dollar for the crap.
Which software were ever "out of beta" really? And how Reaper is the crap???

Reaper has its own GUI "style" and workflow just like any other unique program. It doesn't have to be liked by everyone but its value can not be disputed. I don't understand why assume it's not popular either. Cockos functions and it means it has customers. People are too binary sometimes assuming it must be all or nothing proposition all the time.

Post

There is a few problems with REAPER support. Justin fix too long old bugs. He implement new features, which nobody needs and not implement features users really want. And it( REAPER) still produce a lot of clicks and glitches.

Post

Simple answer : because i'm happy with my actual DAW

k

Post Reply

Return to “Hosts & Applications (Sequencers, DAWs, Audio Editors, etc.)”