Well, speaking with a little knowledge of the software world (only a little though) I can tell you that VST instruments only come in two flavors: Windows and Mac. So "bypassing Windows" isn't really an option, but I agree that a VST machine that has a stripped down and customized version of Windows is a viable solution. Something as simple as putting a VST host (see links in my previous post) in your "startup" group so that when it boots it's read to go should work. And assuming a host like that response to MIDI program change commands, this could be a pretty hands-off environment live (assuming you did your homework and set everything up beforehand).supersor wrote:Is there any way to build a vsti computer that bypasses windows? In my case I needed a live vst running machine... Needless to say that booting into windows and mickey mousing around to get to my soft is not an option in a live situation, especially if you consider the stability of such a system. Still, lately I'm begining to wonder if Muse could have just stripped down windows and saved all the headaches... mind you I'm no software pro... I just know that I need (and paid for) a stable vst machine. A vst machine should play vst's... kinda makes sense to me... not ONLY specific vst's or only NI stuff etc. But anyway I do hope Muse comes through... just throwing my 2 cents in here...jcschild wrote:Maybe you Muse owners/former owners can answer a question
why would you buy the muse as apposed to buying/building a VSTi box (computer)?
for 2k you could have the system and Komplete. and not be limited to what Muse sells supports...
scott
ADK
Also I should have mentioned native instrument's Kore2 platform in my earlier post and possible competition for Muse and Open Labs. From what I have seen of it, it's pretty awesome. You can do a LOT from their little USB hardware thing, and the software can host ANY OTHER VST that lives on the machine. You can layer instruments and chain effects to your hearts content (and to your CPU's limit).

