ZPC #5 poll

Official support for: u-he.com
Post Reply New Topic

Which theme do you want?

Poll ended at Sat Oct 24, 2009 12:27 am

Singing XMFs (DIY Formants, not necessarily human ...)
0
No votes
Broken instrument (it should sound broken, but it should work perfectly)
6
24%
Geomusicology (pick any place in the world, make a patch)
0
No votes
Ecomusicology (pick something from nature, make a patch)
1
4%
Scary sounds (Did I tell you about the Jean Michel Jarre nightmares I had as a kid?)
3
12%
Artificial space (create a perception of depth or space without the obvious FX-based solutions)
1
4%
Layering tonal and atonal sounds (2 sound generators, one per)
1
4%
Had Eno-ugh? (use very long delay times)
0
No votes
Starting points (init patches for a specific class of patches (bass, keys, etc.))
2
8%
Two oscillators and an XMF (very basic architecture, so many possibilities)
8
32%
Anything but a patch (any Zebra patching resources other than a patch - oscillators, MSEGs etc.)
1
4%
Silence the masses (finally recreate some sounds everyone seems to ask, "How do I make this sound?")
2
8%
 
Total votes: 25
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

A whole lot of questions are running through my mind with that description, but I'll wait for the official FAQ... but it does look great!
Top

Post

I thought it was Robert Fripp who pioneered the use of very long delay times in music? So perhaps the poll option should be :

Eno-ugh of this Frippery.

:)

Kind regards.
Dave Bourke
- ideation -
Top

Post

elxicano wrote:But all that says is simply that the new version hasn't corrected anything from the 2.3 version... so might not be a best example (but I still understand the worry).
Yes, sorry, I misread that thread. Maybe I was just looking for something to reinforce my own biases, but I thought that was referring to some arp bugs in 2.5, not pre-existing arp bugs (someone did report a 2.5 arp bug, didn't they? but it did get fixed I think).
Urs wrote:I think that you should move on to 2.5 with the contest.
Yes, whatever I may feel about when to upgrade, that shouldn't affect the choice for the competition. I don't want to hold everyone else up.
Urs wrote:There have been some installation issues here or there (mostly notably with double installs on Mac) but other than that no flaw/issue/bug on 2.5 isn't also present in 2.3. To the contrary, 2.5 fixes a lot of flaws/issues/bugs from 2.3
OK. You have pretty much convinced me. ;-)
Top
Post Reply

Return to “u-he”