A new competitor to Uhe Diva has arived!!!

Official support for: u-he.com
Post Reply New Topic
RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

NI wrote:the most accurate virtual analog synth available
That's what's written in words on their website.

Can't argue with that. :shrug:

Post

Sendy wrote:Have to agree, NI make excellent products but the audio demos I heard sounded more like Massive than Moog.
I really thought this new synth would be Massiver, not a Moog clone :)

Post

tshear23 wrote:How is a Minimoog knock-off that requires Reaktor or Reaktor Player to run in any way competition for DIVA?
And why wouldn't it be (at least to Diva's Minimoog modules)? Just because it uses Reaktor? :roll:

Post

hakey wrote:
NI wrote:the most accurate virtual analog synth available
That's what's written in words on their website.

Can't argue with that. :shrug:
Does it say where exactly the accuracy lies?

Post

EvilDragon wrote:
tshear23 wrote:How is a Minimoog knock-off that requires Reaktor or Reaktor Player to run in any way competition for DIVA?
And why wouldn't it be (at least to Diva's Minimoog modules)? Just because it uses Reaktor? :roll:
Because reaktor is just a posh synth edit :wink:

Post

I'm guessing it's a sort of general, non-specific, all around type of accuracy.

Post

billcarroll wrote:This is even more hilarious considering the rejection letter Urs has from Native Instruments, next to the letter some time later asking to hire him.
Do u have that letter to take a look at?

sorry for of topic

Post

EvilDragon wrote:
Echoes in the Attic wrote:Judging by the examples it sounds like..... Reaktor.
Reaktor doesn't have its "inherent sound" or whatever you want to call it if you use the basic DSP building blocks in Core. It can sound however you want it to, if you know how (the black DSP magic).
+1

Post

hakey wrote:I'm guessing it's a sort of general, non-specific, all around type of accuracy.
So what you are saying is it is a kind of inaccurate accuracy?

Post

>>And why wouldn't it be (at least to Diva's Minimoog modules)? Just because it uses Reaktor? <<

Because one is a self-contained synth that models individual components from many different synths that can be combined and mixed and matched, and the other is the world's 50 millionth Minimoog clone that requires you to run an entirely separate piece of extremely clunky software on top of it run it? A competitor for something like Minimonstah? Sure, but even that is more full-featured than Monark appears to be.

Post

tshear23 wrote:How is a Minimoog knock-off that requires Reaktor or Reaktor Player to run in any way competition for DIVA?
Reaktor is a host, which has a bulding blocks.

They puted high end Analog moddeled blocks in to Reaktor and called that Monark, which might be a competitor to Diva alone, but also do not forget that in Reaktor u can edit anything u want and go as deep as to DSP and mix and match awrything. So i can use some building blcksfrom Monark or u can. use some some building blocks from Reaktor labriry in to Monark and creat something that might jot even existed in real life..

I think it would be cool if Uhe did a fersion of sll their synth but for Reaktor, but unfortionaly as Ursy seid, he likes to build stand alone thins but not modules. But hoefuly they change their mind...

Post

pdxindy wrote:
hakey wrote:I'm guessing it's a sort of general, non-specific, all around type of accuracy.
So what you are saying is it is a kind of inaccurate accuracy?
fuzzy accuracy? :)

Post

In my opinion they should've modeled it without reaktor because also the way the modules connect to each other should matter, no? Like you have filter circuit and envelope circuit and the relation between them or something ... If you want to make accurate moog clone that is. I dunno what the hell I am talking about but felt like participating in the discussion anyway
Last edited by penguinfromdeep on Mon Mar 11, 2013 9:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
circuit modeling and 0-dfb filters are cool

Post

EvilDragon wrote:
Echoes in the Attic wrote:Judging by the examples it sounds like..... Reaktor.
Reaktor doesn't have its "inherent sound" or whatever you want to call it if you use the basic DSP building blocks in Core. It can sound however you want it to, if you know how (the black DSP magic).
Fair enough. But it still sounds like what I know Reaktor to sound like, even if it can sound like anything in theory.

Post

hakey wrote:
pdxindy wrote:
hakey wrote:I'm guessing it's a sort of general, non-specific, all around type of accuracy.
So what you are saying is it is a kind of inaccurate accuracy?
fuzzy accuracy? :)

but is it accurately fuzzy? :hihi:

Post Reply

Return to “u-he”