New Monark video
-
Echoes in the Attic Echoes in the Attic https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=180417
- KVRAF
- 12066 posts since 12 May, 2008
I have to admit that I've been skeptical, but this video did peak my interest somewhat. It sounds like it will be fairly authentic and those classic presets are definitely cool just to have for fun. ALthough I think that making it monophonic is strange, I'd never use polyphony anyways (cpu would be too much). But the one thing that bugs me is not having velocity sensitivity and I don' think this does. That is one really rediculous limitation that there is just no purpose for at all. It doesn't save cpu, it doesn't "unclutter" an interface or anything else remotely good or efficient. Non-velocity keys is something that should never be adhered to when going for authenticity.
- KVRAF
- 27000 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
Sounded good in this video... though the guy spent way too much time talking and played very little, but then I already understand all the functionality and don't need explanations for beginners. And when he set up the filter self resonance, he did not sweep the cutoff!
I have a little suspicion from the demos I have heard that the bass is quite good but that the highs are a touch weak. This is nothing like a conclusion yet, just a tentative first observation. This guy also mostly stayed in the bass end and like I said, did not open the filter with self oscillation.
Look forward to hearing more when it is released...
I have a little suspicion from the demos I have heard that the bass is quite good but that the highs are a touch weak. This is nothing like a conclusion yet, just a tentative first observation. This guy also mostly stayed in the bass end and like I said, did not open the filter with self oscillation.
Look forward to hearing more when it is released...
- KVRAF
- 4090 posts since 29 Jun, 2011 from USA
So does the free version of reaktor allow you to save presets now or do they disappear when you reload your daw?
Aiynzahev-sounds
Sound Designer - Soundsets for Pigments, Repro, Diva, Virus TI, Nord Lead 4, Serum, DUNE2, Spire, and others
Sound Designer - Soundsets for Pigments, Repro, Diva, Virus TI, Nord Lead 4, Serum, DUNE2, Spire, and others
-
- KVRAF
- 1774 posts since 20 Feb, 2003
I know.. That comment wasn't aimed at you, and my apologies if you read it that way.el-bo (formerly ebow) wrote:neither looking to troll nor post any picsPAK wrote: At the same time it's still not a perfect emulation of everything analogue by any means. If that doesn't matter to someone then I'm not sure what they're doing reading Monark threads ( ..looking for trolling opportunities or excuses to post more cat pics?)
It was a general comment about some critics who always appear in certain threads moaning about "yet another" emulation of a synth. They'd have a point if it weren't that "emulations" are usually crude caricatures of what they claim to emulate.
Even stuff like Monark will be a huge (massive?) simplification of the hardware. So it will rely on a lot of ear tweaked code from the dev, and that introduces lots of opportunity for something which will be sonically different from other emulations which have came before. Anyone who likes the hardware's character can only hope those differences involve improvements on how closely it follows the hardware.
Those who complain about features have a point. It wouldn't have been that hard to add polyphony. The fact that it doesn't shouldn't need someone to spell out the obvious though. Monark is about making a statement about the authenticity of what's emulated, and limiting the features is all part of making that statement.
But it's software. It's not like it's the end of the story - it's only the beginning of one. What's been done here will likely be taken and built on in various ways with other NI products..
- KVRAF
- 27000 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
So NI withheld polyphony so that they can sell it to you later...PAK wrote: But it's software. It's not like it's the end of the story - it's only the beginning of one. What's been done here will likely be taken and built on in various ways with other NI products..
- KVRAF
- 24455 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
Whatever you made within your DAW with Reaktor Player will be recalled correctly.Aiynzahev wrote:So does the free version of reaktor allow you to save presets now or do they disappear when you reload your daw?
You can also save the whole Reaktor Player state into .nrkt presets, I think.
-
- KVRAF
- 1774 posts since 20 Feb, 2003
Haha. Maybepdxindy wrote:So NI withheld polyphony so that they can sell it to you later...
Otherwise I think it'd be more surprising if they didn't include things like Monark's filter work in products like a Massive 2 or Kontakt eventually.
-
- KVRist
- 95 posts since 15 Aug, 2006
Sounds really good on its own. The famous presets are way off though.
-
- KVRAF
- 2430 posts since 11 Jan, 2009 from Portland, OR, USA
Here's what I genuinely don't get about excitement about a product like this-- ok, so (maybe) it sounds great, but seriously, this demo shows this guy playing the same sounds we've been hearing from instruments like this for literally decades now.
The guy talks about how the clean, simple interface makes it perfect for getting in and programming from scratch right away, yet, I am genuinely curious, is it really so exciting to be programming the same moog-funk synth bass and blippy leads and mono portamento bending pads that we've been hearing constantly since we were children? Do you really say to yourself, "FINALLY I can program a moog funk bass patch that sounds EXACTLY like its from a MINIMOOG, meaning it's 7 to 8% more authentic than the one I programmed a hundred times already on Minimonsta, or Arturia Minmoog V, or god knows what other thousand emulations..." Nope, I truly don't get the excitement over any of this.
If there are actualy exciting, new, *original* sounds to be coming from an instrument like this, then I'd be genuinely interested in hearing them. But all this emulation stuff keeps getting released, and at least based on all the demos and vids out there, everybody is using them to just keep recreating and playing the exact same sounds, over and over! but "this time" that exact same sound is, at long last, "truly authentic." Hooray?
The guy talks about how the clean, simple interface makes it perfect for getting in and programming from scratch right away, yet, I am genuinely curious, is it really so exciting to be programming the same moog-funk synth bass and blippy leads and mono portamento bending pads that we've been hearing constantly since we were children? Do you really say to yourself, "FINALLY I can program a moog funk bass patch that sounds EXACTLY like its from a MINIMOOG, meaning it's 7 to 8% more authentic than the one I programmed a hundred times already on Minimonsta, or Arturia Minmoog V, or god knows what other thousand emulations..." Nope, I truly don't get the excitement over any of this.
If there are actualy exciting, new, *original* sounds to be coming from an instrument like this, then I'd be genuinely interested in hearing them. But all this emulation stuff keeps getting released, and at least based on all the demos and vids out there, everybody is using them to just keep recreating and playing the exact same sounds, over and over! but "this time" that exact same sound is, at long last, "truly authentic." Hooray?
-
- KVRist
- 252 posts since 6 Jun, 2002 from San Francisco, CA
i already have komplete 8. for $150 i can upgrade to k9 and get this, battery 4, the solid plugins, plus a couple of other sound libraries. or i can get just diva for $180.el-bo (formerly ebow) wrote:sounds great, though i can't think why i would ever choose to buy this over diva
i've pre-ordered k9.
-
Sampleconstruct Sampleconstruct https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=191286
- KVRAF
- 16794 posts since 12 Oct, 2008 from Here and there
-
- KVRist
- 95 posts since 15 Aug, 2006
I complain about that too. The same BS jazz or progressive rock hit sounds.
You have to listen to what's on the outside, in manner of speaking, of the sound. VSTs sound very tight through the center of their sound and then it drops off quite dramatically. Hardware synths, regardless of their nature, have much more timbre and power in the outer edges of their sounds. That's what you want to listen for, other wise yes, what's the difference in all of these VSTs? Not much for the most part.
Monark did very well in that regard to me. Diva is very consistant and strong in sound, but I didn't like it out there on the edges.
You have to listen to what's on the outside, in manner of speaking, of the sound. VSTs sound very tight through the center of their sound and then it drops off quite dramatically. Hardware synths, regardless of their nature, have much more timbre and power in the outer edges of their sounds. That's what you want to listen for, other wise yes, what's the difference in all of these VSTs? Not much for the most part.
Monark did very well in that regard to me. Diva is very consistant and strong in sound, but I didn't like it out there on the edges.
- KVRAF
- 37528 posts since 14 Sep, 2002 from In teh net
Just got an email saying K9 is coming in the mail on the 27th!!
- KVRAF
- 27000 posts since 3 Feb, 2005 from in the wilds
jsd wrote:i already have komplete 8. for $150 i can upgrade to k9 and get this, battery 4, the solid plugins, plus a couple of other sound libraries. or i can get just diva for $180.el-bo (formerly ebow) wrote:sounds great, though i can't think why i would ever choose to buy this over diva
i've pre-ordered k9.
Your loss...
-
- KVRian
- 1107 posts since 31 Oct, 2002 from the high desert
Only took 6 posts for someone to bring up Diva!el-bo (formerly ebow) wrote:sounds great, though i can't think why i would ever choose to buy this over diva

