u-he SATIN as Reason Rack Extension?

Official support for: u-he.com

u-he SATIN as Reason Rack Extension?

yes
36
54%
no
31
46%
 
Total votes: 67

RELATED
PRODUCTS
Satin$149.00Buy

Post

Reason users have been in love with the tape algorithm on Scream4 for years. Having something full featured like Satin should easily pull a profit.

Post

Urs wrote:Well, Clemens, Sascha and I won't spend much time on RE development. The largest part is outsourced.

Unlike an iOS app I think that a Satin RE might create some profits. We need every bit of those as we are going to move to a new location in a few months.
I cant wait for this in the rack, and don't price it dirt cheap either. Without the delay and flanger i still say its worth at least $99. :)

Post

Can we have tuna as option in poll?
Murderous duck!

Post

The presence of class leading plugins like Satin in the RE store can only be a good thing for all involved. They contribute to making the Reason environment more attractive to devoted users and guarantee sales to Urs without the threat of piracy. Assuming most of the core code is re-usable, it seems like a no brainer to me. Voting "no" on a poll like this is silly.

Post

Tronam wrote:Voting "no" on a poll like this is silly.
Surprised me too but then this is KVR. Expect the unexpected.

Looking forward to Satin RE!

Post

Tronam wrote:Voting "no" on a poll like this is silly.
Surprised me too but then this is KVR. Expect the unexpected.

Looking forward to Satin RE!

Post

It is okay to vote "no", but it would be interesting to know why they are have voted "no". I guess they are knowing that "Satin" will look and sound totally great in "Reason" and are unhappy that they don't have it. :hihi:

Post

spktkpkt wrote:It is okay to vote "no", but it would be interesting to know why they are have voted "no". I guess they are knowing that "Satin" will look and sound totally great in "Reason" and are unhappy that they don't have it. :hihi:
Yeah, I'd be curious too. :)

Post

[DELETED]

Post

We have a Satin RE with nearly finished UI, but it currently doesn't work. Crashes Reason.

So we're on a global bug hunt (reflected in the Latest Builds thread) and then we hope that Satin RE will run properly. If not, then we'll try to figure it out. Unfortunately I'm the only developer at u-he dealing with this, but I'm also in charge with a lot of other things. Thus unreleased software such as Satin RE has a lower priority than, say, fixing bugs in released software.

The changes in the latest RE SDK have no influence on how our stuff works. We've always used faster maths than whatever the standard libraries provide. The new SDK still does not allow us to code on assembly level. Thus there won't be a Diva RE anytime soon.

The new UI capabilities are cool, but they are not compatible with our UI code out of the box. A complex control such as a Zebra MSEG needs to be coded from scratch, scrolling panels still seem impossible. Thankfully neither Uhbiks nor Satin need this, but a Zebra RE is still out of the picture (as well as Filterscape and MFM2 I'm afraid).

Furthermore, cables are still confined to the backside, which rules out an ACE RE or a Bazille RE.

Lastly, the UI design process is tedious and can't be done for free. This rules out our freeware offerings.

Thus, so far, Uhbik's and Satin are the only u-he plug-ins that can go RE.

Our main problem with RE is human resources. We've hired 3 more people within half a year, but getting everything up to speed takes time. That's our main bottleneck, but I hope I'll find the time to do this soon.

- Urs

Post

[DELETED]

Post

Well, I have PMs turned off and I have ceased my email account. The only way I can still deal with one-to-one communication is over this forum, or via support at u-he dot com. But even there I sometimes need a few days… :oops:

Post

[DELETED]

Post

Tronam wrote:
spktkpkt wrote:It is okay to vote "no", but it would be interesting to know why they are have voted "no". I guess they are knowing that "Satin" will look and sound totally great in "Reason" and are unhappy that they don't have it. :hihi:
Yeah, I'd be curious too. :)
it's easy, i voted "no" because i don't use reason and want that urs concentrate on the important things. :)
Whoever wants music instead of noise, joy instead of pleasure, soul instead of gold, creative work instead of business, passion instead of foolery, finds no home in this trivial world of ours.

Post

[DELETED]

Locked

Return to “u-he”