you're not alonerobojam wrote:I agree. There are people here who are offensive, arrogant pricks and some who seem to think that I am on some personal crusade to 'get them' - I don't know that it matters whether I mark them as foes or mute them - I can just ignore them. It's not rocket surgery...Hink wrote:muting was a bad enough idea...but tbh the word foe sparks very negative thoughts and I dont care for it...I have no foes myself, some folk I dont care for but a foe?
Dont show threads created by 'Foe'
- Rad Grandad
- 38041 posts since 6 Sep, 2003 from Downeast Maine
The highest form of knowledge is empathy, for it requires us to suspend our egos and live in another's world. It requires profound, purpose‐larger‐than‐the‐self kind of understanding.
-
- KVRAF
- 21348 posts since 26 Jul, 2005 from Gone
Hink wrote:you're not alonerobojam wrote:I agree. There are people here who are offensive, arrogant pricks and some who seem to think that I am on some personal crusade to 'get them' - I don't know that it matters whether I mark them as foes or mute them - I can just ignore them. It's not rocket surgery...Hink wrote:muting was a bad enough idea...but tbh the word foe sparks very negative thoughts and I dont care for it...I have no foes myself, some folk I dont care for but a foe?
- KVRian
- Topic Starter
- 966 posts since 16 Feb, 2010
Just tried this, works great for hiding quotes - thanks!farlukar wrote:greasemonkey to the rescueSome person apparently going by the moniker Numanoid wrote:But if somebody which is not a Foe quotes a Foe's posting, you end up having to read it anyway![]()
Not quite foolproof (see quote in this very post) but better than nothing.
