Minimonsta is 11 years old and it still sounds like the best VA to me.
- KVRAF
- 25849 posts since 20 Jan, 2008 from a star near where you are
MiniMonsta is included in Ohm Studio Pro, so it can be had for just €39
But I am waiting for OhmStudio v2 where one doesn't have to be online to use it.
But I am waiting for OhmStudio v2 where one doesn't have to be online to use it.
-
- KVRAF
- 4751 posts since 22 Nov, 2012
That's kind of the point of ohm studio.electro wrote:Online requirement for a DAW, really?Numanoid wrote: But I am waiting for OhmStudio v2 where one doesn't have to be online to use it.
-
- KVRAF
- 9840 posts since 15 Sep, 2005 from East Coast of the USA
Minimonsta is one of my favorites, and it doesn't matter how old it is. The meta-patch morphing is cool, and the presets are great, especially those by Wakeman
(a Yes fan here
)
-
- KVRAF
- 35671 posts since 11 Apr, 2010 from Germany
Can one extract it for use in other DAW's, or is it restricted for use in Ohm Studio only then?Numanoid wrote:MiniMonsta is included in Ohm Studio Pro, so it can be had for just €39
- KVRAF
- 25849 posts since 20 Jan, 2008 from a star near where you are
Of course you can't, that is stated clearly on the OhmStudio webpagechk071 wrote:Can one extract it for use in other DAW's, or is it restricted for use in Ohm Studio only then?Numanoid wrote:MiniMonsta is included in Ohm Studio Pro, so it can be had for just €39
- KVRAF
- 3031 posts since 6 Jul, 2013
I really like Minimonsta, not for being a MiniMoog, but for the things that's unique to it's architecture, especially the modulation flexibility and the meta-patch morphing as part of a performance. It can still do some really nice, interesting and kinda unique things.
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2427 posts since 11 Jan, 2009 from Portland, OR, USA
Yeah, so: I am not a fan of Arturia. If that's a passible emulation for you, great. But it's not for me. I've spent some time with it. It's not crap, but it's just.. OK.electro wrote:It already exists
http://www.arturia.com/matrix-12-v/overview
And besides, my point is I specifically want a GFORCE take on the Xpander. They already overlap with the Minimoog, who cares if they overlap with another emulation.
-M
- KVRAF
- 2175 posts since 10 Mar, 2006
Extremely beautifulannode wrote:Using Minimonsta in everything except wurly keys hit and strings in second half of this(4:58);
https://soundcloud.com/annode-1/annode- ... s-pts1and2
Love the the juxtaposition of styles.
"The educated person is one who knows how to find out what he does not know" - George Simmel
"I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me." - Jesus Christ
"I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me." - Jesus Christ
- KVRAF
- 18340 posts since 26 Jun, 2006 from San Francisco Bay Area
I'm right there with you. Gforce has a great idea with their key triggered patch morphing. I do feel that they dropped the ball, though. Minimonsta could really use a touch up, but as has been said, there are now several good mini emulations. They'd have to come up with something to set them apart from the competition to get my attention.beely wrote:I really like Minimonsta, not for being a MiniMoog, but for the things that's unique to it's architecture, especially the modulation flexibility and the meta-patch morphing as part of a performance. It can still do some really nice, interesting and kinda unique things.
Zerocrossing Media
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
4th Law of Robotics: When turning evil, display a red indicator light. ~[ ●_● ]~
-
- KVRAF
- 7540 posts since 7 Aug, 2003 from San Francisco Bay Area
I never quite knew the whole story, but the key triggered patch morphing came from Ohm Force. You'll recall that GForce used to be GMedia, and that GForce was some kind of collaboration with Ohm Force when they introduced the Mini with patch morphing.zerocrossing wrote:I'm right there with you. Gforce has a great idea with their key triggered patch morphing. I do feel that they dropped the ball, though. Minimonsta could really use a touch up, but as has been said, there are now several good mini emulations. They'd have to come up with something to set them apart from the competition to get my attention.beely wrote:I really like Minimonsta, not for being a MiniMoog, but for the things that's unique to it's architecture, especially the modulation flexibility and the meta-patch morphing as part of a performance. It can still do some really nice, interesting and kinda unique things.
Incomplete list of my gear: 1/8" audio input jack.
- KVRAF
- 3031 posts since 6 Jul, 2013
Yes, the Ohmies coded the Oddity and Minimonsta for GForce.
-
- KVRAF
- 3219 posts since 23 Dec, 2002
If you get a chance give the Monark by Native Instruments a try. I have two hardware moogs in the studio and the Scope Minimax and plugiator versions which were considered the closest emulations until Monark. I'd say Monark is at the top of the heap but they all very good. I probably wouldn't have purchased Monark but it came with Komplete Ultimate. I use it a lot. It is hungry for CPU but is worth the toll.
- KVRAF
- 25849 posts since 20 Jan, 2008 from a star near where you are
...but MiniMonsta is so much more than just a faithful MiniMoog emulation 
-
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2427 posts since 11 Jan, 2009 from Portland, OR, USA
Scotty wrote:If you get a chance give the Monark by Native Instruments a try. I have two hardware moogs in the studio and the Scope Minimax and plugiator versions which were considered the closest emulations until Monark. I'd say Monark is at the top of the heap but they all very good. I probably wouldn't have purchased Monark but it came with Komplete Ultimate. I use it a lot. It is hungry for CPU but is worth the toll.
I have it, as a Komplete owner. As mentioned in my OP, I just don't like it. I've done A/B tests programming things on Monark and Minimonsta. For my tastes, Minimonsta always sounds better. And, it's much more fun to program -- the knobs on Monark are weirdly slow imo, so dialing in values is a PITA that it shouldn't be. Also, Minimonsta just offers far more modulation capabilities, since it's not (like Monark) a literal-minded emulation. I also like how easy it is to dial in MIDI mod control, like Velocity > Cutoff or Volume, etc.
But the main factor for me, again, is the quality of the sound, the character I find it has. Monark sounds...alright, but can also sound brittle and hard to my ears; I know, useless descriptors probably, but that's my feeling on it. I guess the point at the end of the day is that I love the Gforce/ Minimonsta "sound," regardless of whether it's more or less authentic than any other emulation. For the music I'm writing with it, though, it sounds to me the most satisfyingly retro-analog.
-M
