That was 2011.
Like 8 years ago.
Its now free, so whats up with demoing it again ?
Go on, throw caution to the wind, live a little, give it a try
That was 2011.
You just got a thing for cute Asian gurlzForgotten wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2019 9:55 pmI bought it based off this reviewer's comments:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIOAdIdew3U
What are you talking about? It's a solid, well-constructed review...telecode wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2019 9:59 pmYou just got a thing for cute Asian gurlzForgotten wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2019 9:55 pmI bought it based off this reviewer's comments:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIOAdIdew3U
When a software tool becomes all-encompassing, it also incurs longer and deeper menus, more UI elements, and a slower and more frustrating workflow. There are more possibilities to cram into your finite mind, and you have to remember how to actually use that particular workflow. The more specialized the tool, the faster and easier it is.antic604 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2019 9:24 am And very segmented, as if the market participants "agreed" they'd slice the cake in certain way and don't want to eat up into others' piece. What I mean? For example why won't Cubase add something like a clip launcher? Or more advanced modulation features? Or devices making it easier to generate or process stuff in parallel. All this is sort of possible, but often very cumbersome and limited, whereas is a breeze in Live or Bitwig. Or why won't those two add audio comping, more advanced MIDI editing, pitch correction? Their users have been begging for this for years already. It's kinda as if they've agreed "we'll take the bands & film composers, whereas you take the bedroom producers".
I plan to reveal - HDSRS: A 'Hybrid Daw Sequencing Rack Synthesizer'. in 2020, but it's at odds with what I'm planning in the motion graphics field in whether I'll be able to pull it off or not. HDSRS is absolutely massive in size and complexity, that considering to rebuild it for higher resolutions and new vision of GUI design is a monumental task...beatmangler443 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2019 3:39 am So what's everyone's take on the DAW market? You thought about switching DAW's for another one? See any companies coming with a DAW next year?
I shot the footage personally in my living room as she was so intent on getting a Dub Turbo review out there...
Why would they? There are already a dozen different ways to do anything you need to do in Cubase, why add even more cruft and clutter? I could understand why something like Bitwig or Ableton Live might need more stuff, the workflow isn't anywhere near as flexible, but Cubase absolutely does not.antic604 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2019 9:24 amFor example why won't Cubase add something like a clip launcher? Or more advanced modulation features? Or devices making it easier to generate or process stuff in parallel. All this is sort of possible, but often very cumbersome and limited, whereas is a breeze in Live or Bitwig.
Really? You'd rather have 20 versions of the same thing than 20 different things?Or why won't those two add audio comping, more advanced MIDI editing, pitch correction? Their users have been begging for this for years already. It's kinda as if they've agreed "we'll take the bands & film composers, whereas you take the bedroom producers".
Those are choices you make. I am completely confident I will have no trouble at all using Cubase on stage, just as I have no problem at all doing sound design and everything else in Cubase.I guess what I'm saying is I'd gladly welcome more competition in the field, which would only benefit the users. Currently many have to use 2-3 DAWs to complete a project (for example Reason for sound design and song sketching, Cubase for mix & master, Live for live performance) and that's probably not ideal.
Uhuh. So what's it going to be written in?THE INTRANCER wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2019 2:37 amI plan to reveal - HDSRS: A 'Hybrid Daw Sequencing Rack Synthesizer'. in 2020, but it's at odds with what I'm planning in the motion graphics field in whether I'll be able to pull it off or not. HDSRS is absolutely massive in size and complexity, that considering to rebuild it for higher resolutions and new vision of GUI design is a monumental task...beatmangler443 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2019 3:39 am So what's everyone's take on the DAW market? You thought about switching DAW's for another one? See any companies coming with a DAW next year?
At the same time it is also one of the most cited praises of reaper
Horses for courses obviously. Any particular difference between products might be a selection driver for a particular user.
That's why I moved to reaper. I think reaper's focus is on 'no compromise' when it comes to functionality. That indeed means it is somewhat of a nightmare to people who want to 'dive in and make music' (there are typical other DAWs for that) but it is a godsend for someone who wants to setup a no-compromise workflow (and won't shy away of some manual diving and setting up macros and such).
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2024
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement