a need ? i can´t answer you that.billinder33 wrote: Sun Feb 15, 2026 9:46 pm Pro-Q, Pro-MB, and MA Fuse Comp (for upward compression), would there be any need for this tool?
The way i work is so differently than what most other people are doing.
I´m not into track production works.
I´m not too much a fan of consolidated function blocks either. And myself totally used to just take the single function blocks, but full fledged, and just chain these.billinder33 wrote: Sun Feb 15, 2026 9:46 pm Generally, I understand that consolidation of tools into a single tool can be beneficial in cases - mult-FX, synths with multiple osc types, channel strips, etc. But I'm rarely using the processes this tool provides (mostly as a last resort) and don't think I've ever applied multiple of them to the same source.
In this case, i found it to be a win to have several functions put into one single plugin.
I have all the other TBT "plugins" for example ( but not the analog clone ones)
yes, there is more to it.
one example:
- take the SnappySnap LE (free) single plugin host (or take even the big one). Which allows to morph two states of a plugin (all parameters). I had a test going. That was great ! undoable with a bunch of single plugins.
Having these different functions blocks within one tool will help to learn to understand these tools, and how to combine these functions. IF one already knows all of that. A chain of single plugins might work exactly as good.....or even better ?
All in one, it´s side by side soloable / mutable........compare ! That´s very helpful for me. It has a high "learning effect" to me.
I had so far a hard time to understand where these resonance peak limiters could be of help for my sound. With F-MB did i immetiately see where to apply what. i found it just intuitiv to operate
so, the question: "what can it replace ?" is one.
But the other is: "how can one gain a better access to such functions IF one is not already totally used to it ?" ..........That´s a point
