Windows PC speed used for Tracktion

Discussion about: tracktion.com

What is the speed of the PC you run Tracktion on?

Poll ended at Fri Feb 11, 2005 8:36 pm

Pentium III of any kind
9
15%
P4, 2GHz or slower
12
20%
P4, 2.2GHz to 3.06HHz 533 FSB
10
16%
P4, 2.4 or faster, 800MHz FSB
20
33%
Xeon or Celeron
3
5%
Laptop (Pentium-M)
4
7%
PC? I wanted to vote "Fish"!
3
5%
 
Total votes: 61

RELATED
PRODUCTS

Post

Mom . . . the Windows PC people won't let me play with them again!

:cry:

Powerbook 1GHz 768 MB . . .

Post

Athlon XP2200+ w/768 PC2100 RAM

Post

Intel Pentium-M 1.7Ghz, 1Gb ram, edit: WindowsXP
Last edited by ModuLR on Wed Feb 02, 2005 2:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
ModuLR / Radio

Post

amd 2400+, 1 gig of ram, windows xp.

Post

I have it on my spare puter,,,its an athlon 900 /512 ram,,,but no internet or ports needed,,just the vid/0404,,.
In the bios I turned agp aperature from 128 to 64,,,pci latency to 96 from 32..
Those 2 edits gave me more synths without changing latency.....

cheerz...

Ed

Post

woolyloach wrote:
jens wrote:
woolyloach wrote:So, what speed PCs [Windows only] are Tracktioneers running Tracktion on? I'm curious because I'm having a hard time convincing myself I need to upgrade my P4 2.53GHz system.. but wonder if everyone else is faster/slower than my box?

It's kinda OT.. but not really.. :lol:
so in your world exist only PCs with intel cpu? :?
Oooops, I forgot about AMD and I can't add options to the poll! Remind me not to post a poll before I've had at least 3 cups of coffee..

Sorry AMD users. :cry:
And here I was thinking y'all might be talking about Macs. *sniff* Meanies.

pasam1 and I are going to go play somewhere else!

Oh, and iBook G3 700MHz, 640 MB SDRAM.

Ryan
www.r-blog.com

Post

Fascinating.. seems like my machine is right about the low-midrange of most Tracktion users, but I feel like it's the slowest dog in the world! :-o

After some experimentation, it seems that my primary issue is my insane desire to stack multiple synths in a rack (Rhino and Kubik? Ouch!). Bouncing everything down to audio and deleting the MIDI tracks frees up enough CPU horsepower for 3 Final Mixers, a Voxengo CurveEQ, a Voxengo Elephant (High Quality) and still leaves me under 50% CPU! :shock:

Maybe I should go back to hardware, or playing guitar instead of all these VSTi. :cry: :help:
Bandcamp: https://suitcaseoflizards.bandcamp.com/
Linux Mint, Waveform 13 Pro, U-He synths, Audio Damage effects,.

Post

woolyloach wrote:Fascinating.. seems like my machine is right about the low-midrange of most Tracktion users, but I feel like it's the slowest dog in the world! :-o

After some experimentation, it seems that my primary issue is my insane desire to stack multiple synths in a rack (Rhino and Kubik? Ouch!). Bouncing everything down to audio and deleting the MIDI tracks frees up enough CPU horsepower for 3 Final Mixers, a Voxengo CurveEQ, a Voxengo Elephant (High Quality) and still leaves me under 50% CPU! :shock:

Maybe I should go back to hardware, or playing guitar instead of all these VSTi. :cry: :help:
I think stacking enough Kubiks and Rhinos in a rack could bring any computer to its knees :o . They sure sound good tho (I only have the demos). I joined the WusikStation group buy for this reason. It sounds incredible plus its CPU friendly.
Image

Post

Athlon64 3000+

RonC

Post

AMD Athlon XP1700+/FSB266, 512MB DDR, audio-only W2K

I've also used Cubase VST/32 and SX1+2 on this setup, and never had CPU problems. My tracks are sparse when it comes to synths, and I don't use any biggies except Crystal... and if I start with fx before I've rendered tracks I never finish the song :oops:

Post

Athlon 1700+ with 768 meg of PC133 ram!! :o

She-yit, I need a new machine. Simply haven't got around to getting new one in three years now...

Post

I wanted to vote "Fish" because there is no Athlon XP (2800? dunno really) with a FSB of 333MHz listed :roll: but decided it may be "compatible" to the P4 @ 2GHz.

Weather a specific system is sufficient or not greatly depends on how you use it, so its very personal. If you want arguements for upgrading, its certainly not Tracktion itself that wants the CPU power, but its the plugins you drag on the tracks that consume CPU power. And the harddisk (and how you use it) is a potential weak link also, especially when dealing with lots of audio tracks or huge sample libraries.

Post

AMD 2500+(1833 MHz) OC to 2250 MHz 2*256 MB RAM 333 Mhz

and the Soundstorm 5.1 DD onboard soundcard :-(
16 bit 48KHz 3-5 ms latency

Post

Ti's laptop:

HP Pavilion
P4 2.8GHz 533 FSB, 512KB L2
1024MB DDR (2 x 512MB)
ATI MOBILITY RADEON 9000 IGP
40GB EIDE @ 4200rpm
DVD-ROM/CD-RW combo
15.4 inch WXGA TFT (1280 x 800) LCD
Echo Indigo IO

XP SP1 with all updates
NOD32 Anti-virus

Post

piaz mothership :

celeron 1.2GHz (yep)
1Go SDR 100MHz
Emulator X (for CPU saving)
DMX6Fire (for playing games til Emu knows how to make a driver :? )
WinXP SP2 with many profiles

Anybody for/against the miniMac to replace this ?(instead of another soon-to-be-dated Intel-like stuff in beige casing).
piaznest.com

Post Reply

Return to “Tracktion”