2. Yes
3. US-428
4. Nothing that hasn't been said before
Steve
3rd Party Controllers
-
- KVRist
- 169 posts since 10 Feb, 2003 from Melbourne, Australia
1. Yes
2. Yes
3. US-428
4. Nothing that hasn't been said before
Steve
2. Yes
3. US-428
4. Nothing that hasn't been said before
Steve
-
- KVRian
- 1112 posts since 17 Jul, 2003 from Kauai, HI
1. No (awaiting new computer)
2. Yes
3. UC16, Novation Remote 25 audio
4. Voted "Important"
Tom
2. Yes
3. UC16, Novation Remote 25 audio
4. Voted "Important"
Tom
-
- KVRAF
- 1974 posts since 21 Jun, 2002 from Earth
1. Yes
2. Yes
3. Korg MicroKONTROL
4. If you need the specs, I've got the documentation on implementing Korg's native mode. It's pretty straight forward (as I've got some hack code working), and would allow microKONTROL users to take advantage of it's "endless encoders" which are only functional when in korg's native mode.
2. Yes
3. Korg MicroKONTROL
4. If you need the specs, I've got the documentation on implementing Korg's native mode. It's pretty straight forward (as I've got some hack code working), and would allow microKONTROL users to take advantage of it's "endless encoders" which are only functional when in korg's native mode.
ModuLR / Radio
-
- KVRian
- 779 posts since 3 Apr, 2003 from UK
1. Yes
2. Yes
3. Behringer Nano BCN44 (hey, I've run out of cash, okay?!)
4. For me actual support would be nice but no essential - after all it's only got 12 discrete controls!
2. Yes
3. Behringer Nano BCN44 (hey, I've run out of cash, okay?!)
4. For me actual support would be nice but no essential - after all it's only got 12 discrete controls!
-
- KVRAF
- 2417 posts since 17 Jun, 2003
1. Yes. But not the boxed version (yet)
2. Yes.
3. Behringer BCF2000, Kenton Spindoctor (which i'd sell if anyone wants it, 'cos i don't use it), M-Audio O2 which has buttons and knobs
4. I'd vote so-so, but mainly because the BCF2000 can be set to run in MCU emulation mode, so I can already use it to drive Tracktion's playback controls, and gets feedback for the faders etc. So i'd rather something else was worked on, but I realise that's a bit selfish. If I couldn't use the feature, i know i'd want to. Oh, and I'd love an MCU, but at £699 for the MCU, or £125 for the BCF2000, i'm afraid that decision was made for me ...
2. Yes.
3. Behringer BCF2000, Kenton Spindoctor (which i'd sell if anyone wants it, 'cos i don't use it), M-Audio O2 which has buttons and knobs
4. I'd vote so-so, but mainly because the BCF2000 can be set to run in MCU emulation mode, so I can already use it to drive Tracktion's playback controls, and gets feedback for the faders etc. So i'd rather something else was worked on, but I realise that's a bit selfish. If I couldn't use the feature, i know i'd want to. Oh, and I'd love an MCU, but at £699 for the MCU, or £125 for the BCF2000, i'm afraid that decision was made for me ...
Last edited by chico.co.uk on Sun Jul 17, 2005 2:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"my gosh it's a friggin hardware"
-
- KVRian
- 652 posts since 1 Apr, 2005 from Illinois
1. Yes
2. Yes
3. M-Audio Oxygen-8
4. I'd like to echo RonC'c comments (my sentiments exactly):
2. Yes
3. M-Audio Oxygen-8
4. I'd like to echo RonC'c comments (my sentiments exactly):
rpc9943 wrote:
4. If anything you could at least support automatable transport. it would be the easiest fix for now. Just like you assign things, you can assign a midi button to control any plugin, why not just make another folder that sets other settings, such as <Transport> "play, ff, pause, rewind, record automation, record, etc" and even have a scrub "jog shuttle left, right" assign. i think this should first be implemented, and then after that you can work on other features. But this idea I have would probably be highest priority in order for users to be able to be happy to use their controllers. Or you should hire one man whose really knowledged in controllers and have him work on extensions for it.
RonC
-
- KVRist
- 212 posts since 23 Feb, 2003 from Charlotte, VT
1. Yes
2.Yes
3. Edirol PCR-50 (Usually, sometimes 49)
4. It's not important to the way I work.
2.Yes
3. Edirol PCR-50 (Usually, sometimes 49)
4. It's not important to the way I work.
Pythagorean perennialist.
-
- KVRer
- 18 posts since 10 Mar, 2004
1. Yes
2. Yes
3. Tascam FW-1082
4. It seems to work fairly well. More flexibility with control assignments would be welcome but this may be more of a Tascam driver issue. Perhaps Mackie and Tascam could work together on this?
Marc
2. Yes
3. Tascam FW-1082
4. It seems to work fairly well. More flexibility with control assignments would be welcome but this may be more of a Tascam driver issue. Perhaps Mackie and Tascam could work together on this?
Marc
-
- KVRAF
- 5851 posts since 9 Jul, 2002 from Helsinki
1. Yes.
2. No
3. [edited*] Evolution MK-461C, Contour ShuttlePro
4. I have T2, a normal MIDI keyboard with knobs & sliders, and a Contour Shuttle Pro... hard to see any benefits from a dedicated control surface.
* I thought my controllers don't count
2. No
3. [edited*] Evolution MK-461C, Contour ShuttlePro
4. I have T2, a normal MIDI keyboard with knobs & sliders, and a Contour Shuttle Pro... hard to see any benefits from a dedicated control surface.
* I thought my controllers don't count
Last edited by .jon on Mon Aug 15, 2005 1:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRer
- 23 posts since 11 Jul, 2003 from Seattle, WA
1. Yes
2. Yes
3. Edirol PCR 30
4. I haven't tried using midi learn for Traction control. It would nice to be able to use the sliders for mixing and other automation. It's nice the way Reason launches and automatically knows what controller is in use.
2. Yes
3. Edirol PCR 30
4. I haven't tried using midi learn for Traction control. It would nice to be able to use the sliders for mixing and other automation. It's nice the way Reason launches and automatically knows what controller is in use.
-
- KVRist
- 124 posts since 25 Oct, 2003 from Paris, France
1. Yes
2. Yes
3. Behringer BCR2000
4. Works like a charm in "fake" Mackie Mode (except for the last firmware update, which messed up the solo/mute commands - I will have to investigate)
2. Yes
3. Behringer BCR2000
4. Works like a charm in "fake" Mackie Mode (except for the last firmware update, which messed up the solo/mute commands - I will have to investigate)
piaznest.com
-
- KVRian
- 1272 posts since 11 Apr, 2002 from Nashville, TN
-
- KVRist
- 163 posts since 22 Aug, 2004 from Seattle, WA
1.Yes
2.sort of
3.edirol pc30 (getting ready to buy a mackie control, perhaps)
4.Ditto valley. I'd rather see you guys get things working really well with two options (mackie control, and perhaps behringer or something less $) than get some functionality for tons of surfaces. Buying the appropriate surface is part of my investment in tracktion.
2.sort of
3.edirol pc30 (getting ready to buy a mackie control, perhaps)
4.Ditto valley. I'd rather see you guys get things working really well with two options (mackie control, and perhaps behringer or something less $) than get some functionality for tons of surfaces. Buying the appropriate surface is part of my investment in tracktion.
You seem to be "out of luck" like Billy Bob was out of luck when Angelina was riding his face. --Pough
-
- KVRAF
- 2009 posts since 9 Apr, 2003 from Cornwall, UK
1.y
2.y
3.evolution mk425
4.I'd like a basic setup guide and some explanation of the theory plus some basic examples of what to do. Also a complete list of things I can control in T2 and the technical midi data info in a nice easy to understand chart.
2.y
3.evolution mk425
4.I'd like a basic setup guide and some explanation of the theory plus some basic examples of what to do. Also a complete list of things I can control in T2 and the technical midi data info in a nice easy to understand chart.
