u-he

Urs · Post by **Urs** » Sat Nov 18, 2017 1:47 pm

Updated first post...

Repro V1.1 public beta Linux (VST2) Linux version has a few drawing errors in the preset browser

woodsdenis · Post by **woodsdenis** » Sat Nov 18, 2017 2:38 pm

Urs wrote:
woodsdenis wrote:Bug

When opening the Save patch dialog box it’s completely white wth no color or text visible. Anyone else see this.
Studio One?

Yes S1 3.52. All ok in Cubase 9.5

Urs · Post by **Urs** » Sat Nov 18, 2017 2:42 pm

woodsdenis wrote:
Urs wrote:
woodsdenis wrote:Bug

When opening the Save patch dialog box it’s completely white wth no color or text visible. Anyone else see this.
Studio One?
Yes S1 3.52. All ok in Cubase 9.5

Yep... Studio One uses a feature in MacOS that's only available, from, dunno, 10.9 or 10.10? - As we keep backwards compatibility as far back as 10.7, we can not access this feature. Therefore we're kind of lost with this... you have to guess where to click, but afaik once you type away it's visible...?

ejgallego · Post by **ejgallego** » Sat Nov 18, 2017 2:47 pm

Urs wrote:Updated first post...

Repro V1.1 public beta Linux (VST2) Linux version has a few drawing errors in the preset browser

Thanks Urs, testing right away.

eivindengedal · Post by **eivindengedal** » Sat Nov 18, 2017 2:51 pm

Elektronisch wrote:
eivindengedal wrote:Here is a very quick comparison I did with my Dave Smith Prophet 8 (same sound as the rev2):

https://soundcloud.com/eivind-engedal/d ... impression

The first one is always the DSI pro8.

I have only had the Repro-5 beta for about one hour, so this is indeed a first impression. I am pretty impressed by how quick you can come up with useable presets on the Repro-5, as I used about 2 minutes to make the pad patch in the end. I think the two synths sound pretty similar, but they both have a character of their own.

Download for uncompressed sound.

I am very impressed with Repro-5!
Thank you! can you give more of patch comparisons?

I plan to do that, but I didn’t have the time to do that today. Next up is trying to recreate my favorite self made patches from the prophet 8. Maybe I can do without it now.

Crazy that the Repro-5 runs great on my ancient MacBook Pro (i7), and big props to u-he for making it able to use multiple cores. Several single core softsynths (serum, reactor 6) are borderline unusable on my system.

waltercruz · Post by **waltercruz** » Sat Nov 18, 2017 3:13 pm

Waiting for Starsky Carr video comparing this and other Prophets

Chris-S · Post by **Chris-S** » Sat Nov 18, 2017 3:26 pm

Chris-S wrote:Anyway, my computer seems to be to old for this.

Correction: In Reaper it's ok. First test was with SaviHost.
(Core i7 Laptop, 2.6 GHz)

MickMack7 · Post by **MickMack7** » Sat Nov 18, 2017 3:31 pm

Also: Ryzen5 1600 Win10 RME 128Samples
C-Dur Akkord
Studio One 3 / RePro-5/ Padsound HS Cinematic Plash oder so. 55% CPU
Cubase 9.5 / RePro-5/ Padsound HS Cinematic Plash oder so. kein spielen möglich, nur Aussetzer

egbert · Post by **egbert** » Sat Nov 18, 2017 3:34 pm

Urs wrote:
woodsdenis wrote:Bug

When opening the Save patch dialog box it’s completely white wth no color or text visible. Anyone else see this.
Studio One?

I am not seeing this in Studio One PC 64 bit using Repro 5 beta. What are you using woodsdenis?

Urs · Post by **Urs** » Sat Nov 18, 2017 3:35 pm

Yeah, we might need to figure out how to trick some hosts into Repro-friednly behaviour

That said... we do have a glimpse of hope to reduce CPU a fair bit. The beta was built with a certain debug option turned on by accident, which may add up to a 10% performance penalty, and we do have to investigate why Diva's multi core has less overhead than Repro's. Doesn't make sense right now, but is a glimpse of hope.

Urs · Post by **Urs** » Sat Nov 18, 2017 3:36 pm

egbert wrote:
Urs wrote:
woodsdenis wrote:Bug

When opening the Save patch dialog box it’s completely white wth no color or text visible. Anyone else see this.
Studio One?
I am not seeing this in Studio One PC 64 bit using Repro 5 beta. What are you using woodsdenis?

Win is fine, MacOS is culprit.

drzhnn · Post by **drzhnn** » Sat Nov 18, 2017 3:39 pm

And what's the story with Velvet presets?

I tried loading genuine Satin presets and Velvet just ignores them. But after some manual file editing they actually worked. And Repro-5 can even save and recall patches with such Velvet presets

So now my question is: is this feature officially supported?

Urs · Post by **Urs** » Sat Nov 18, 2017 3:45 pm

drzhnn wrote:is this feature officially supported?

Absolutely!

Just don't expect us to make a full blown preset browser for this... let's promote the idea that adding Satin presets *in moderation* is a good thing, and no, there'll never be support for delay/flanger presets. Azimuth is off the marks too, it's a banned parameter in Velvet, as we don't want Repro-5 presets that sound "broken".

Funkybot's Evil Twin · Sat Nov 18, 2017 4:01 pm

drzhnn wrote:And what's the story with Velvet presets?

I tried loading genuine Satin presets and Velvet just ignores them. But after some manual file editing they actually worked. And Repro-5 can even save and recall patches with such Velvet presets

So now my question is: is this feature officially supported?

How'd you do that, and does it work the other way too?

Funkybot's Evil Twin · Sat Nov 18, 2017 4:05 pm

I would really enjoy the ability to use a chorus and a delay at the same time in a RePro patch. I hope we eventually (not for December obviously) get the ability to load up two instances of Lyrebird, and/or get freely assignable effect slots (who needs an EQ anyway). Heck, even a Lyrebird mode that acted as a combined chorus/delay would work as a short-term solution.

u-he

KVR Audio

Repro-5 public beta (Repro V1.1)