Please check the Contact Information section of http://www.cytomic.com/Beta/The_Glue_Beta_Info.html for the email address to extend your trail version for a little longer.cYrus wrote:after the 10 day trial period is there no way to demo it with more limitations? would have liked to try it on other material today but my demo has run out.
I have found the schematics of the SSL 4000 desk here http://www.ka-electronics.com/images/SS ... _index.htm and will look through them to see if there is any difference in the model I have done to that as to a clue as to what is going on here. If there is anything that is a subtle change to improve my algorithm I will be happy to implement it, but I am happy with the sound of The Glue so I don't really want to do anything that will impact it too muchadl wrote:...I down't know what the UAD 4K does but it seems to enhance reverbs quiet nice and so produces some kind of wideness / "more open" sounding effect.
andy_cytomic wrote:I have found the schematics of the SSL 4000 desk here http://www.ka-electronics.com/images/SS ... _index.htm and will look through them to see if there is any difference in the model I have done to that as to a clue as to what is going on here. If there is anything that is a subtle change to improve my algorithm I will be happy to implement it, but I am happy with the sound of The Glue so I don't really want to do anything that will impact it too muchadl wrote:...I don't know what the UAD 4K does but it seems to enhance reverbs quiet nice and so produces some kind of wideness / "more open" sounding effect.
Andrew Simper
Hello Andrew, I think you've done a pretty good work with The Glue. Like you you've said before "I've done my job and the rest is down to personal taste as to weather you like the sound of the original or not". I bought your product (and I'm sure most of us did it) because of how it sounds now. I'm not against impovements and all tests and comparissons made here and at Gearslutz but imHo they are pointless (with due respect to all those you've dedicated some of their time on the tests). If you like the UAD, Waves or the real one more than The Glue and you can afford it/them just buy it/them. I know you're running all those tests to be sure about your purchase but asking for The Glue to be like them is pointless too. It's incredibly good like it is now and like I said I'm not against improvements but maybe Andrew could focus all his efforts on finishing his web page, bugs fixing and final release instead of trying to satisfy some of us with "suggestive" remarks. Andrew, please, if you're going to change something in the plug-in make it optional always because I LOVE how it sounds now.andy_cytomic wrote:I have found the schematics of the SSL 4000 desk here http://www.ka-electronics.com/images/SS ... _index.htm and will look through them to see if there is any difference in the model I have done to that as to a clue as to what is going on here. If there is anything that is a subtle change to improve my algorithm I will be happy to implement it, but I am happy with the sound of The Glue so I don't really want to do anything that will impact it too muchadl wrote:...I down't know what the UAD 4K does but it seems to enhance reverbs quiet nice and so produces some kind of wideness / "more open" sounding effect.
Andrew Simper
+1Hello Andrew, I think you've done a pretty good work with The Glue. Like you you've said before "I've done my job and the rest is down to personal taste as to weather you like the sound of the original or not". I bought your product (and I'm sure most of us did it) because of how it sounds now. I'm not against impovements and all tests and comparissons made here and at Gearslutz but imHo they are pointless (with due respect to all those you've dedicated some of their time on the tests). If you like the UAD, Waves or the real one more than The Glue and you can afford it/them just buy it/them. I know you're running all those tests to be sure about your purchase but asking for The Glue to be like them is pointless too. It's incredibly good like it is now and like I said I'm not against improvements but maybe Andrew could focus all his efforts on finishing his web page, bugs fixing and final release instead of trying to satisfy some of us with "suggestive" remarks. Andrew, please, if you're going to change something in the plug-in make it optional always because I LOVE how it sounds now.
Additional features like dual-mono and M-S might very well solve the stereo field issues some of us are reporting. Andrew had earlier said these would be easy to implement so there's not really anything to compromise. Personally, I would buy it for these additional features alone.Mercado_Negro wrote:Like you you've said before "I've done my job and the rest is down to personal taste as to weather you like the sound of the original or not". I bought your product (and I'm sure most of us did it) because of how it sounds now.
Good additions yes. And fairly easy to implement I would think. Makes the compressor more versatile. Although I cant see an issue with the stereo field.Uncle E wrote:Additional features like dual-mono and M-S might very well solve the stereo field issues some of us are reporting. Andrew had earlier said these would be easy to implement so there's not really anything to compromise. Personally, I would buy it for these additional features alone.Mercado_Negro wrote:Like you you've said before "I've done my job and the rest is down to personal taste as to weather you like the sound of the original or not". I bought your product (and I'm sure most of us did it) because of how it sounds now.
if it sits well with his UAD setup and holds its own thats more confirmation plus i use Ableton Live 7 for alot of my own stuff and as inspiration/creative base - so its good to hear its all running well their and then when engineering other bands or mixing and editing my own stuff its all Pro Tools M-Powered (With the FXPansion VST To RTAS Adapter deployed for certain plug-ins that are VST only).
I think I spotted your problem.cain wrote:quick question or problem ,i just downloaded and installed the 1.0.8 beta on my cubase vst folder, with my other plugins and effects. my problem is cubase does not see the plugin effect.
my pc is a Q6600 2.4(o.c. to 3.o) with 4 gigs and 3x 300 gig sata drives on windows xp with a rme 9632 soundcard running cubase vst5.2. also tried on my other pc to with no luck ,e8500 3.1(o.c. to 3.8 ) 4 gigs and 3 x 300 sata drives windows xp , rme 9632 ,cubase vst5.2
i open cubase up and go to choose it in my effects and its not there but it is in my vst plugins folder ,would there be a reason that i maybe overlooking why it wont show up on my systems. i doubled check to make sure the dll is in the plugin folder in cubase and it is but it still does not show.
if any one has any ideas please let me know
im going to load my energy xt 2 tommorow in one of my pc to test out the compressor. But why not (the other) Cubase 5?cain wrote:yeah i know i know
(its just that cubase vst5 still fills my needs and works great with my 2 pc's but was looking at sonar 8 as my next host)
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026
