I agree with you.ThomasHelzle wrote:Well, all of this just makes it more obvious how important it is to have a dedicated UVI/Falcon forum.
This thread became some kind of LinearAllInOneLongRowForumBugReportSoundAndScriptReleaseThingy which is silly.
Having FAQs all over KVR somewhere will not help people who are not as proficient with using forums as some long-time-users.
And it's not always easy to find something when you just start out - you may not even know what to search for.
Moaning about how users use it wrongly or how useless it is to ask for a forum will not solve anything either, but just create more noise, create a negative vibe and make people hesitant to post instead of talking freely.
And as much as I like the sounds and examples from Patch Adams and Patchpool (I really do, I bought libraries from both) I also find it weird if this one main thread turns into a kind of advertisement thread - you can't really unsubscribe if you want to stay on top of it and getting reminders all the time for another example for a new library is becoming noise at one point too.
This is absolutely NOT against anybody, but IMO it's time to revise the decision about a dedicated forum on UVIs side.
It is simply wrong to not have one, be it here or on their own site.
BTW. I found the discussion about samples and batch editing quite interesting - good stuff about the XML editing - and thanks arachnaut for the soundpack!
Cheers and sorry of I tread on anybodies toes - it's crowded in here![]()
Tom
I did not know Falcon was related to Mach 5 when I bought it a few weeks ago and I had no previous UVI products.
So sometimes following these posts is difficult.
Falcon is really cool, but it crashes a lot for me. I've submitted one bug report, but I'm not going to do it for everything that I find wrong. I figure it will get shaken out soon. Most of the crashes won't allow me to resume Falcon, I need to re-boot for some reason (I'm on Windows 10 Pro TH2).
It probably crashes for me because I don't know how to use it 'properly'.
For me, I find it's "bottom up" approach unusual and strange.
I usually experiment and tweak things a lot and this machine is rather hard to use that way - at least on samples. I haven't tried the other oscillators yet.
My advice is that people save their work often.

