Love seeing this Space X stock go down every day.
Too bad that once congress approves $1.5 trillion for the defense (war) department, they will sign a data center deal with welfare queen Elon and bail him out.
Anyone else noticed the increase of Vibe coded plugins flooding the market?
-
- KVRian
- 689 posts since 18 May, 2020
REAPER + Davinci Resolve Pro on Manjaro KDE. Neve 88m. Focusrite 18i20 2nd gen. Neumann NDH30 headphones. Mics: Telefunken TF39, AT4050, Miktek C7e, EV RE-15. VSTs: u-he Hive 2, F'em, Renoise Redux, Apisonic Speedrum 2.
- KVRAF
- 16885 posts since 8 Mar, 2005 from Utrecht, Holland
Newsflash
Codeberg (an alternative platform to GitHub] is going to change their terms of use to prohibit 'vibe-coded projects'.
https://blog.codeberg.org/protecting-ou ... -llms.html
Codeberg (an alternative platform to GitHub] is going to change their terms of use to prohibit 'vibe-coded projects'.
https://blog.codeberg.org/protecting-ou ... -llms.html
To us, it seems ridiculous to see projects with a single developer and virtually no users consuming as much or even more resources than some of the largest community projects on Codeberg, which operate frugal with CI/CD and storage resources. We do not believe it is reasonable for Codeberg to invest our precious donation money into hosting of large ghost projects.
We are the KVR collective. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated. 
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
My MusicCalc is served over https!!
-
- KVRAF
- 16865 posts since 13 Oct, 2009
This is about their business model though. It's also signaling at the moment. However, they will face the same detection problem that everyone else does. This will not go as people expect and will end up as tribal finger-pointing. For the solo dev, central git platforms don't really offer much.BertKoor wrote: Thu Jul 23, 2026 5:30 pm Newsflash
Codeberg (an alternative platform to GitHub] is going to change their terms of use to prohibit 'vibe-coded projects'.
https://blog.codeberg.org/protecting-ou ... -llms.html
To us, it seems ridiculous to see projects with a single developer and virtually no users consuming as much or even more resources than some of the largest community projects on Codeberg, which operate frugal with CI/CD and storage resources. We do not believe it is reasonable for Codeberg to invest our precious donation money into hosting of large ghost projects.
I feel their pain, but, this is still an arbitrage moment as people use tools as they were intended from the past when the world was different to signal something that has less value going forward. They are correct, ghost projects provide little value. So, sunset projects with little to no activity, problem solved.
