DIVA known issues
- KVRian
- 909 posts since 26 Nov, 2005
I am having a couple of issues. I am running on a Win 7 Toshiba Laptop with an i7 processor. I am using Sonar X1 as my DAW.
1. If Mode is set to Legato and Note Priority is set to Last, there is no output. All other modes seem to sound fine and Legato works fine with Highest and Lowest values.
2. When I try to save a preset, my keystrokes aren't picked up by the plugin so I am not able to enter new information. There is a button on the Sonar part of the window that directs keystrokes to plugin, but no matter how that is set, the plugin doesn't pick them up.
I apologize if these have already been reported.
Thanks,
JJ Biener
1. If Mode is set to Legato and Note Priority is set to Last, there is no output. All other modes seem to sound fine and Legato works fine with Highest and Lowest values.
2. When I try to save a preset, my keystrokes aren't picked up by the plugin so I am not able to enter new information. There is a button on the Sonar part of the window that directs keystrokes to plugin, but no matter how that is set, the plugin doesn't pick them up.
I apologize if these have already been reported.
Thanks,
JJ Biener
- KVRAF
- 1736 posts since 19 May, 2006 from Nomadic (Chicago and San Francisco mostly)
Real Bug: When flipping the modulation switches on the left of the 3 oscillator module it sometimes causes my host to freeze and for maybe a quarter of a second you can hear the audio buffer looping.
This seems to happen only sometimes, and it seems to only happen the first time the switch is toggled. Subsequent toggling doesn't reproduce the freezing behaviour, but each switch has a high likelihood of causing it the first time it's toggled.
I'll need to check the previous beta to be sure, but that seems to be a new problem.
Windows 7x64, Energy XT2 (32 bit).
Maybe Bugs:
There's some weirdness with the new demo.
I can't put my finger on it, but something feels a little off. Sorry, that's not a very good bug report.
It seems like its CPU "clipping", which is fine, but when it does its like the FX go away and some different, sort of totally different sound comes out, like unfiltered oscillators or something. It's startling and odd. Maybe its a problem in my ASIO latency, but I've never heard it do that before.
This seems to happen only sometimes, and it seems to only happen the first time the switch is toggled. Subsequent toggling doesn't reproduce the freezing behaviour, but each switch has a high likelihood of causing it the first time it's toggled.
I'll need to check the previous beta to be sure, but that seems to be a new problem.
Windows 7x64, Energy XT2 (32 bit).
Maybe Bugs:
There's some weirdness with the new demo.
I can't put my finger on it, but something feels a little off. Sorry, that's not a very good bug report.
It seems like its CPU "clipping", which is fine, but when it does its like the FX go away and some different, sort of totally different sound comes out, like unfiltered oscillators or something. It's startling and odd. Maybe its a problem in my ASIO latency, but I've never heard it do that before.
noise and beats: Negutyv Xeiro do people actually click these?
gearlust: Roland JP-8000, too much/not enough eurorack
machinecode by: u-he, Bitwig, Fabfilter, NI, et al
gearlust: Roland JP-8000, too much/not enough eurorack
machinecode by: u-he, Bitwig, Fabfilter, NI, et al
- KVRAF
- 12522 posts since 21 Mar, 2008 from Hannover, Germany
Hi,
looks like the 12dB/24db switch in the Jupiter 8 filter is still missing. Would be nice to have this in the final version.
Ingo
looks like the 12dB/24db switch in the Jupiter 8 filter is still missing. Would be nice to have this in the final version.
Ingo
Ingo Weidner
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1
Win 10 Home 64-bit / mobile i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz / 16GB RAM //
Live 10 Suite / Cubase Pro 9.5 / Pro Tools Ultimate 2021 // NI Komplete Kontrol S61 Mk1
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30186 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
Yeah... I think we need to do it in a .x update. Maybe in a 1.1 for Musikmesse in late March or so.Ingonator wrote:Hi,
looks like the 12dB/24db switch in the Jupiter 8 filter is still missing. Would be nice to have this in the final version.
Ingo
It can easily take a month or two to get there. The "clean" OTA Ladder is already "not quite there", we might as well revisit the whole thing and add it as an extra option later, but this time more spot on.
-
Echoes in the Attic Echoes in the Attic https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=180417
- KVRAF
- 12004 posts since 12 May, 2008
Urs any thoughts on this? From you've said it sounds like DRAFT mode should have a filter that opens less. I'm seeing it open far more early.Echoes in the Attic wrote:Not sure if it's a bug, or if it behaved this way in previous betas, but in the last one (467), the draft mode yields a very different resonance setting to the other modes. The resonance (emphasis in the transistor ladder anyways) when on draft at lower settings seems equivalent to the values of the other modes when they have a much higher resonance.
I'm not at home and don't recall the patch I was using but if you give give the filter a fairly quick sweeping envelope it should be noticeable. Use fast or higher quality and put the emphasis around 50% and play a note. Now put it on DRAFT mode. The resonance is much higher, more like when the emphasis is near 100% on other modes. It doesn't seem like just a quality thing. Actually I think the draft mode sounds pretty good, there is just much more resonance at lower settings.
Bug?
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30186 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
In draft mode you can feel the curse of the 1 sample delay in the filter feedback. Because draft mode does what common synths do.Echoes in the Attic wrote:Urs any thoughts on this? From you've said it sounds like DRAFT mode should have a filter that opens less. I'm seeing it open far more early.Echoes in the Attic wrote:Not sure if it's a bug, or if it behaved this way in previous betas, but in the last one (467), the draft mode yields a very different resonance setting to the other modes. The resonance (emphasis in the transistor ladder anyways) when on draft at lower settings seems equivalent to the values of the other modes when they have a much higher resonance.
I'm not at home and don't recall the patch I was using but if you give give the filter a fairly quick sweeping envelope it should be noticeable. Use fast or higher quality and put the emphasis around 50% and play a note. Now put it on DRAFT mode. The resonance is much higher, more like when the emphasis is near 100% on other modes. It doesn't seem like just a quality thing. Actually I think the draft mode sounds pretty good, there is just much more resonance at lower settings.
Bug?
For that reason, resonance explodes on some filter types and vanishes on others, mostly in the upper octaves.
At least, we managed to keep the modes in relatively similar tuning by frequency - but unfortunately not by res volume.
So I wouldn't call it a bug per se. Merely a side effect.
We will make clear in manuals and docs that draft mode is really just that. Any expected/desired behaviour is available only from fast and up.
- KVRAF
- 4197 posts since 23 May, 2004 from Bad Vilbel, Germany
A few bugs:
1) Noise modulation can take the volume "below silence" i.e. audible again.
2) Using the scrollwheel to select modulation sources delivers them in the wrong order
3) Can't use Trackpad scroll function for changing footages (due to inertia effect, I guess)
1) Noise modulation can take the volume "below silence" i.e. audible again.
2) Using the scrollwheel to select modulation sources delivers them in the wrong order
3) Can't use Trackpad scroll function for changing footages (due to inertia effect, I guess)
Last edited by Howard on Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30186 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
That's so going to end tomorrowHoward wrote:Bug: Noise modulation can take the volume "below silence" i.e. audible again.
- KVRAF
- 4197 posts since 23 May, 2004 from Bad Vilbel, Germany
-
Echoes in the Attic Echoes in the Attic https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=180417
- KVRAF
- 12004 posts since 12 May, 2008
I see thanks. In this particular case the res does indeed explode. A bit rough but it sounds cool! It's sort of as if DRAFT mode is like an extra rougher-upper effect for variation.Urs wrote:In draft mode you can feel the curse of the 1 sample delay in the filter feedback. Because draft mode does what common synths do.Echoes in the Attic wrote:Urs any thoughts on this? From you've said it sounds like DRAFT mode should have a filter that opens less. I'm seeing it open far more early.Echoes in the Attic wrote:Not sure if it's a bug, or if it behaved this way in previous betas, but in the last one (467), the draft mode yields a very different resonance setting to the other modes. The resonance (emphasis in the transistor ladder anyways) when on draft at lower settings seems equivalent to the values of the other modes when they have a much higher resonance.
I'm not at home and don't recall the patch I was using but if you give give the filter a fairly quick sweeping envelope it should be noticeable. Use fast or higher quality and put the emphasis around 50% and play a note. Now put it on DRAFT mode. The resonance is much higher, more like when the emphasis is near 100% on other modes. It doesn't seem like just a quality thing. Actually I think the draft mode sounds pretty good, there is just much more resonance at lower settings.
Bug?
For that reason, resonance explodes on some filter types and vanishes on others, mostly in the upper octaves.
At least, we managed to keep the modes in relatively similar tuning by frequency - but unfortunately not by res volume.
So I wouldn't call it a bug per se. Merely a side effect.
We will make clear in manuals and docs that draft mode is really just that. Any expected/desired behaviour is available only from fast and up.
- u-he
- Topic Starter
- 30186 posts since 8 Aug, 2002 from Berlin
-
- KVRAF
- 2336 posts since 13 Oct, 2002 from Terra Firma
I don't know if this is a bug...
Some DIVA patches that Win 7 Task Manager and Core Temp show are using 18% CPU slow down Reaper 4 while others that use 21% CPU or more play normally. I'm not sure why some patches that eat only 18% CPU are slowing down Reaper and others aren't.
My desktop:
Win 7 x64, AMD X6 1090T, 12GB Ram, NVidia GT480 display card, 2 x 1TB HDD, ASIO4ALL @ 1024 latency, Reaper v4.13 x64.
Some DIVA patches that Win 7 Task Manager and Core Temp show are using 18% CPU slow down Reaper 4 while others that use 21% CPU or more play normally. I'm not sure why some patches that eat only 18% CPU are slowing down Reaper and others aren't.
My desktop:
Win 7 x64, AMD X6 1090T, 12GB Ram, NVidia GT480 display card, 2 x 1TB HDD, ASIO4ALL @ 1024 latency, Reaper v4.13 x64.
-
- KVRian
- 743 posts since 14 Apr, 2004
I was playing with parameters there and there and then, after some time i noticed this "itself" change into effect slot2:

I selected rotary before, but then i've not touched its parameters, i started to tweak OSCs and Filter and after some time i've noticed that "hybridization" between rotary and chorus!
Could be happened also in the meantime that i was switching between the bottom panels.

I selected rotary before, but then i've not touched its parameters, i started to tweak OSCs and Filter and after some time i've noticed that "hybridization" between rotary and chorus!
Could be happened also in the meantime that i was switching between the bottom panels.
- KVRAF
- 5234 posts since 25 Feb, 2008
Found a possible bug with the modifications page.
The patches in the link below are identical, save for in "patch 2" the output from Multiply is routed through the Adder module. Only one signal is running into the Adder, so the signal should pass through it unaffected. However, that's not what happens. Patches here.
Edit: voice stack seems to be involved (the problem disappears when voice stack is set to 1)
The patches in the link below are identical, save for in "patch 2" the output from Multiply is routed through the Adder module. Only one signal is running into the Adder, so the signal should pass through it unaffected. However, that's not what happens. Patches here.
Edit: voice stack seems to be involved (the problem disappears when voice stack is set to 1)
Last edited by hakey on Thu Dec 15, 2011 7:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- KVRian
- 777 posts since 13 Dec, 2011
(Diva rev 472)
- Select Dual VCO 2 oscillators module;
- Set octave knob for oscillator 2 fully clockwise (2');
- Set detune knob (oscillator 2) fully clockwise (value display = 30.00);
- Double click on detune knob to reset its position.
The value display = 36.00, but detune is audibly still at 30.00, and the osc2 octave knob disappears.
It's probably trying to display itself in a 1' position for which it has no image.
- Select Dual VCO 2 oscillators module;
- Set octave knob for oscillator 2 fully clockwise (2');
- Set detune knob (oscillator 2) fully clockwise (value display = 30.00);
- Double click on detune knob to reset its position.
The value display = 36.00, but detune is audibly still at 30.00, and the osc2 octave knob disappears.
It's probably trying to display itself in a 1' position for which it has no image.
