New DIVA components

[Urs]

Yes, the ATC... I just find it tedious to program. I'd use it more if there was a decent editor.

I agree that a TB-303 is something different than Diva with a sequencer and a 303-ish filter. That won't make the combo in Diva less divine.

We'll see.

[rod_zero]

Lets renews the faith in the cs 80 too

[chilly7]

Lets renews the faith in the cs 80 too

Noo!
Oberheim 8 voice

[hakey]

Oberheim 8 voice

How do you envisage cramming eight lots of envelope, filter and oscillator controls (which you'd needed to replicate each of the eight individual SEMs) into Diva?

[hakey]

Yes, the ATC... I just find it tedious to program. I'd use it more if there was a decent editor.

Would a generic editor do the job - Sound Diver, or similar?

[Urs]

Yes, the ATC... I just find it tedious to program. I'd use it more if there was a decent editor.

Would a generic editor do the job - Sound Diver, or similar?

Sure. One with customisable UI... must work on Mac though, I don't think I like the ones for iPad well enough...

[fmr]

Oberheim 8 voice

How do you envisage cramming eight lots of envelope, filter and oscillator controls (which you'd needed to replicate each of the eight individual SEMs) into Diva?

Do you really think THAT was what made the EVS different? I don't think so. Besides, if that' would be necessary, we could always pile eight instances of monophonic patches (boring, but doable).

[hakey]

Oberheim 8 voice

How do you envisage cramming eight lots of envelope, filter and oscillator controls (which you'd needed to replicate each of the eight individual SEMs) into Diva?

Do you really think THAT was what made the EVS different?

Different to a single SEM, yes.

[fmr]

Oberheim 8 voice

How do you envisage cramming eight lots of envelope, filter and oscillator controls (which you'd needed to replicate each of the eight individual SEMs) into Diva?

Do you really think THAT was what made the EVS different?

Different to a single SEM, yes.

No kidding...
http://www.vintagesynth.com/oberheim/obx.php

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oberheim_OB-X





Edited to fix the second video link.

[fmr]

Anyway, all of those are nothing, compared to these:

http://www.vintagesynth.com/oberheim/xpander.php

http://www.vintagesynth.com/oberheim/mat12.php

[__K__]

Where is the 'all of the above' button?

[Urs]

Very simple: Modules of OB-X, SEM, CS-80 are doable for Diva, but concepts of Matrix-12, Obie 8-voice, CS-80 are not.

[electro]

Very simple: Modules of OB-X, SEM, CS-80 are doable for Diva, but concepts of Matrix-12, Obie 8-voice, CS-80 are not.

The Memorymoon CS-80 is good but x86 only.

Why don't you do a strait Matrix-12 emulation, assuming you have the hardware to model.

[fmr]

Very simple: Modules of OB-X, SEM, CS-80 are doable for Diva, but concepts of Matrix-12, Obie 8-voice, CS-80 are not.

Yes, I know I accept, but I'm not happy No sir!

[Urs]

Very simple: Modules of OB-X, SEM, CS-80 are doable for Diva, but concepts of Matrix-12, Obie 8-voice, CS-80 are not.

The Memorymoon CS-80 is good but x86 only.

Why don't you do a strait Matrix-12 emulation, assuming you have the hardware to model.

Because we're not a Xerox. Some developers may find joy in creating exact replica of old synths, but we simply don't. We love to solve riddles and we love to come up with our own elegant designs. Therefore, as long as we can, we'll avoid copying someone elses ideas.