New MPE synths...
-
- KVRAF
- 1894 posts since 2 Apr, 2015
It probably doesn't count but I recently got a Roland MC-707 to get hold of the Zen Core engine to use as a sound module really.
You can have 8 channels and replicate the patch across the channels, supports X/Y/Z but is a slight pain to setup! Pitchbend works very well, no lagging or anything.
Used this way you can have 128 "MPE Patches" instantly available (saved as scenes) in a loaded project and change between them with program changes sent to the global channel (I have not tested this bit yet).
One problem is the dreaded same not played twice though for mono patches, not as bad as some as it doesn't loose the original note it just doesn't seem to retrigger the envelopes.
You can have 8 channels and replicate the patch across the channels, supports X/Y/Z but is a slight pain to setup! Pitchbend works very well, no lagging or anything.
Used this way you can have 128 "MPE Patches" instantly available (saved as scenes) in a loaded project and change between them with program changes sent to the global channel (I have not tested this bit yet).
One problem is the dreaded same not played twice though for mono patches, not as bad as some as it doesn't loose the original note it just doesn't seem to retrigger the envelopes.
-
John the Savage John the Savage https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=396119
- KVRian
- 868 posts since 28 Mar, 2017
Funny you should mention this...
I was thinking about picking up an MC-101 for the very same reason; and it's USB powered, so I could (theoretically) power it from one of the host ports on my MPC Live onstage. Purportedly, the 101 has the exact same audio engine as the 707, but I'm yet unclear as to what limitations the 101 poses by comparison. To that end, if anyone knows, I'd love to hear about it.
I'm currently using the MPC's onboard synths in a similar fashion, but I'm interested in the rompler aspect of the Roland engine as well. Keygroups on the MPC are pretty crude for that sort of application.
Cheers!
I was thinking about picking up an MC-101 for the very same reason; and it's USB powered, so I could (theoretically) power it from one of the host ports on my MPC Live onstage. Purportedly, the 101 has the exact same audio engine as the 707, but I'm yet unclear as to what limitations the 101 poses by comparison. To that end, if anyone knows, I'd love to hear about it.
I'm currently using the MPC's onboard synths in a similar fashion, but I'm interested in the rompler aspect of the Roland engine as well. Keygroups on the MPC are pretty crude for that sort of application.
Cheers!
-
- KVRist
- 188 posts since 10 May, 2018
This raises an interesting question. Are there any hardware ROMplers that are currently good for MPE use? With the Modal SKULPT in hand, I’m pleased to have something affordable that works at all, but the sample-based stuff has always been something I like to work with, and I admit that I use the apps on iOS that use samples more than most of the modeling options.John the Savage wrote: Sat Sep 19, 2020 10:52 pm Funny you should mention this...
I was thinking about picking up an MC-101 for the very same reason; and it's USB powered, so I could (theoretically) power it from one of the host ports on my MPC Live.
I'm currently using the MPC's onboard synths in a similar fashion, but I'm interested in the rompler aspect of the Roland engine as well.
Cheers!
Mike Metlay, PhD (nuclear physics -- no, seriously!) 
listen to me: Mr. Spiral | join the fam: RadioSpiral | my gig: Atomic Words LLC (coming soon)
listen to me: Mr. Spiral | join the fam: RadioSpiral | my gig: Atomic Words LLC (coming soon)
-
- KVRAF
- 1894 posts since 2 Apr, 2015
mrspiral wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2020 4:05 pmThis raises an interesting question. Are there any hardware ROMplers that are currently good for MPE use? With the Modal SKULPT in hand, I’m pleased to have something affordable that works at all, but the sample-based stuff has always been something I like to work with, and I admit that I use the apps on iOS that use samples more than most of the modeling options.John the Savage wrote: Sat Sep 19, 2020 10:52 pm Funny you should mention this...
I was thinking about picking up an MC-101 for the very same reason; and it's USB powered, so I could (theoretically) power it from one of the host ports on my MPC Live.
I'm currently using the MPC's onboard synths in a similar fashion, but I'm interested in the rompler aspect of the Roland engine as well.
Cheers!
Well the 101 has only 4 tracks channels so for MPE use 4 instead of 8 notes, it also has half the cpu/dsp power of the 707, and you cannot fully edit patches.
Concerning the rompler side it is the same old PCM stuff that Roland has been selling for years.
The best hardware rompler that I know about is the Kronos, disk streaming, proper key mapped samples supports MPE via multiple channels.
Then again the Kronos is the best synth ever made
-
John the Savage John the Savage https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=396119
- KVRian
- 868 posts since 28 Mar, 2017
Thanks for the info Andy... Appreciated, as always.
https://www.pipes.rocks/
It took a long time to come to fruition, and the sales spraff during its early development was somewhat convoluted and made some lofty claims, so I lost interest; but it seems to have arrived. Mm... Or maybe not just yet?
That said, I don't know anyone who has one, and have never seen one in the flesh myself. I also remain unclear about certain aspects of the platform; but then, perhaps I just haven't made enough of an effort to get to grips with their particular brand of verbiage.
At a glance, it's a glorified rompler, with some light synthesis capabilities and a few other bells and whistles. Mind you, based on my (albeit limited) interaction with the developers early on, I think they would take exception to that otherwise pedestrian description.
Anyway, according to the literature, it is "fully MPE compatible"; though, to what end, I can't quite determine.
The form factor is about right — complete with a USB host port — so, if anyone owns (or has used) one of these, and would like to chime in, I'm all ears.
Cheers!
Well, this thing has been on my radar for a while:mrspiral wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2020 4:05 pm Are there any hardware ROMplers that are currently good for MPE use?
https://www.pipes.rocks/
It took a long time to come to fruition, and the sales spraff during its early development was somewhat convoluted and made some lofty claims, so I lost interest; but it seems to have arrived. Mm... Or maybe not just yet?
That said, I don't know anyone who has one, and have never seen one in the flesh myself. I also remain unclear about certain aspects of the platform; but then, perhaps I just haven't made enough of an effort to get to grips with their particular brand of verbiage.
At a glance, it's a glorified rompler, with some light synthesis capabilities and a few other bells and whistles. Mind you, based on my (albeit limited) interaction with the developers early on, I think they would take exception to that otherwise pedestrian description.
Anyway, according to the literature, it is "fully MPE compatible"; though, to what end, I can't quite determine.
The form factor is about right — complete with a USB host port — so, if anyone owns (or has used) one of these, and would like to chime in, I'm all ears.
Cheers!
-
- KVRist
- 188 posts since 10 May, 2018
Interesting. Definitely pushes most of my particular buttons, especially with the 3x hub on board. Interesting that it doesn't have a B port for computer connection, implying that they really do expect it to work as its own little computer rather than as a dumb interface. Either a good thing or an iffy thing, dependent on your needs. I've signed up for the mailing list and will follow it with interest.John the Savage wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2020 11:11 pmWell, this thing has been on my radar for a while:mrspiral wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2020 4:05 pm Are there any hardware ROMplers that are currently good for MPE use?
https://www.pipes.rocks/
The form factor is about right — complete with a USB host port — so, if anyone owns (or has used) one of these, and would like to chime in, I'm all ears.
Cheers!
BTW, John, thanks for my new word of the day: "Spraff." If only I knew what it meant.
Mike Metlay, PhD (nuclear physics -- no, seriously!) 
listen to me: Mr. Spiral | join the fam: RadioSpiral | my gig: Atomic Words LLC (coming soon)
listen to me: Mr. Spiral | join the fam: RadioSpiral | my gig: Atomic Words LLC (coming soon)
-
John the Savage John the Savage https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=396119
- KVRian
- 868 posts since 28 Mar, 2017
It's a uniquely Scottish synonym for "patter" with a smidgen of sarcasm...mrspiral wrote: Mon Sep 21, 2020 5:12 pm BTW, John, thanks for my new word of the day: "Spraff." If only I knew what it meant.
Very useful.
Cheers!
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 9545 posts since 6 Jan, 2017 from Outer Space
Vast Dynamics jumped on the MPE wagon with their Vaporizer for an affordable price:
https://www.vast-dynamics.com
https://www.vast-dynamics.com
- KVRAF
- 2721 posts since 8 Jun, 2010
- Roger Linn Design
I've added it to the Recommended Sounds page.
-
- KVRist
- 291 posts since 9 Sep, 2019 from Denmark
It is not available, but you can surely buy the t-shirts. So 2020.John the Savage wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2020 11:11 pm Thanks for the info Andy... Appreciated, as always.
Well, this thing has been on my radar for a while:mrspiral wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2020 4:05 pm Are there any hardware ROMplers that are currently good for MPE use?
https://www.pipes.rocks/
-
- KVRist
- 57 posts since 5 Apr, 2014
I can confirm the Xerxes's MPE works fine.SteveElbows wrote: Thu Aug 06, 2020 10:04 pm I suppose the Xerxes should be added to the Black Corp entry since that one supports MPE as well, although I dont have a Xerxes myself so cannot confirm first-hand.
Also I have learnt that the UDO Super 6 (already listed on your site), despite being the first hardware synth I know of that has MPE printed on the panel (as a label for one of the buttons), doesnt have MPE implemented in its current firmware version. They currently have September listed for implementation in their known issues document, and I will be happy to post here again in future to let you know when it has actually been implemented and made available. http://udo-audio.com/downloads/super-6-known-issues.pdf
Along with my Xerxes, I also have a Super 6--layers great with the Xerxes, by the way--and I can confirm that its MPE is not yet implemented. It's only estimated to be implemented in the 4th quarter of 2020 according to their documentation of what's in development.
- KVRAF
- 2721 posts since 8 Jun, 2010
- Roger Linn Design
I've added Xerxes to the Recommended Sounds page.
- KVRAF
- 2721 posts since 8 Jun, 2010
- Roger Linn Design
I'm sorry, all. I forgot to add Newflangled Audio's "Generate" to the MPE list on my Recommended Sounds page. I've just done so.
-
- KVRist
- 133 posts since 30 Jan, 2010
Hi Roger,
You may want to point out that the U-He instruments are not fully MPE compatible, they are just "multi channel MIDI-enabled" and "MIDI channel 1 as master" is not implemented, that means you can do the whole per-note pitch bending but if you have a sustain pedal it will not react to it.
More here: viewtopic.php?f=31&t=550961
Cheers
Hari
You may want to point out that the U-He instruments are not fully MPE compatible, they are just "multi channel MIDI-enabled" and "MIDI channel 1 as master" is not implemented, that means you can do the whole per-note pitch bending but if you have a sustain pedal it will not react to it.
More here: viewtopic.php?f=31&t=550961
Cheers
Hari
- KVRAF
- 2721 posts since 8 Jun, 2010
- Roger Linn Design
Thanks, harissa. I've just added a note about that on the Recommended Sounds page, including a suggestion that for sending such common messages, the user should set LinnStrument to send common messages over all channels redundantly. This is done in Per-Split Settings by pressing the selected Main Channel button to turn it off.
