and the rest is here http://forum.cubase.net/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=16413
Cubase.net = locked threads GALORE!!!
-
- KVRer
- 11 posts since 14 Jun, 2005
When I'm right is it this way. When you wanna start a topic you need to have fill in your Dongle number, not when you reply or posting in the lounge.
and the rest is here http://forum.cubase.net/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=16413
and the rest is here http://forum.cubase.net/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=16413
-
original flipper original flipper https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=8999
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2544 posts since 14 Sep, 2003 from Essex
HI
Did you read my post?
4 hours and 3 E-Mails to get the post unlocked ... does this seem NORMAL to you?
Ah, anyway - you probably are a Cubase.net forum moderator, so you will argue all day!!!
If you know anything about SL/SX differences AS PER MY QUESTION you might have offered advice; but you are focusing on trying to make me sound like I messed up - why not give me a solution to my question.
What a joker ... I am outa here!
Flipper.
Did you read my post?
4 hours and 3 E-Mails to get the post unlocked ... does this seem NORMAL to you?
Ah, anyway - you probably are a Cubase.net forum moderator, so you will argue all day!!!
If you know anything about SL/SX differences AS PER MY QUESTION you might have offered advice; but you are focusing on trying to make me sound like I messed up - why not give me a solution to my question.
What a joker ... I am outa here!
Flipper.
-
original flipper original flipper https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=8999
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2544 posts since 14 Sep, 2003 from Essex
HI
Well 'Cryogenic' - please tell me the difference?
Do you not think I did a Google, the only sphpeel around is the compare PDF - this tell's you what features are included but does not tell anything else, I checked for reviews - there are none.
I am going by a screen shot that I saw that had the Inspector and a single Mixer strip placed in a way I had not seen in SXV3 (which I have) also if you had read my post at Cubase.net you would have been aware of what I wrote.
So asking for information and being given the run around for 4 hours is being a 'Drama Queen'?
I am only responding to the likes of yourself and Pluu because I find it interesting what causes people to enter a thread: with nothing constructive to add.
Don't get me wrong if you can tell me if SL is a more streamlined product and in what way then fine give up the info?
But I don't imagine you can help me, and all Pluu can say is that I can find the information elsewhere - man that is a SOLID bit of forum help!!!
Do you guy's know why I come here?
Generally for some product support or to discuss a product, why do you come here
.....
Flipper.
Well 'Cryogenic' - please tell me the difference?
Do you not think I did a Google, the only sphpeel around is the compare PDF - this tell's you what features are included but does not tell anything else, I checked for reviews - there are none.
I am going by a screen shot that I saw that had the Inspector and a single Mixer strip placed in a way I had not seen in SXV3 (which I have) also if you had read my post at Cubase.net you would have been aware of what I wrote.
So asking for information and being given the run around for 4 hours is being a 'Drama Queen'?
I am only responding to the likes of yourself and Pluu because I find it interesting what causes people to enter a thread: with nothing constructive to add.
Don't get me wrong if you can tell me if SL is a more streamlined product and in what way then fine give up the info?
But I don't imagine you can help me, and all Pluu can say is that I can find the information elsewhere - man that is a SOLID bit of forum help!!!
Do you guy's know why I come here?
Generally for some product support or to discuss a product, why do you come here
.....Flipper.
-
- KVRAF
- 3364 posts since 16 Feb, 2004 from atop a katamari
i have to say i can't see any reason to bash into original flipper for this. i can see nothing going in steinberg's forum's favour, it's just a really bad service. sorry flipz0 i can't answer your questions. i personally think cubase sucks balls. but pluu and cryogenic, you're hardly being helpful, and serve only to highlight the point being made.
total load of bollockshite
total load of bollockshite
Kick, punch, it's all in the mind.
-
- KVRAF
- 13444 posts since 14 Nov, 2000 from Hannover / Germany
Flipper, the thing with the channel strip in SX is that you can actually have it show all elements... just that the Steinberg programmers are too dumb to actually implement almost anything in a way making sense.
Not only will you allways be looking at freaking EIGHT inserts, regardless whether you're only using one or two (the same goes for the sends), no, when you enable them to be shown along with channel fader, sends and whatever, they will exceed any screen height easily - and, which is just proving extendend dumbness, you can't scroll down there to actually access whatever is at the bottom. That's just as stupid as it could get. Sometimes I just can't find appropriate words for the dilemma they're calling a user interface...
However, as SL seems to have less inserts and sends (4 of each?) it's clearly looking way more tidy if you expand them all in the inspector. So, yeah, in that case less is actually more. Personally I wouldn't mind having a 4 sends/inserts version of SX just because of that. I'm hardly ever using more anyways.
But, certainly it'd do best if the idiot UI programmers at Steinberg would finally get a clue about what they were doing. They obviously don't use the program all that much.
Not only will you allways be looking at freaking EIGHT inserts, regardless whether you're only using one or two (the same goes for the sends), no, when you enable them to be shown along with channel fader, sends and whatever, they will exceed any screen height easily - and, which is just proving extendend dumbness, you can't scroll down there to actually access whatever is at the bottom. That's just as stupid as it could get. Sometimes I just can't find appropriate words for the dilemma they're calling a user interface...
However, as SL seems to have less inserts and sends (4 of each?) it's clearly looking way more tidy if you expand them all in the inspector. So, yeah, in that case less is actually more. Personally I wouldn't mind having a 4 sends/inserts version of SX just because of that. I'm hardly ever using more anyways.
But, certainly it'd do best if the idiot UI programmers at Steinberg would finally get a clue about what they were doing. They obviously don't use the program all that much.
There are 3 kinds of people:
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
Those who can do maths and those who can't.
-
original flipper original flipper https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=8999
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2544 posts since 14 Sep, 2003 from Essex
HI
Thanks for a couple of positive bit's of feedback!
I personally am going to sell SXV3 - it just hasn't met my needs, a friend was interested in potentially getting SL3 (I might be as well) - if it was less cumbersome.
There is so little information around on SL - thats why I asked the question.
Flipper.
Thanks for a couple of positive bit's of feedback!
I personally am going to sell SXV3 - it just hasn't met my needs, a friend was interested in potentially getting SL3 (I might be as well) - if it was less cumbersome.
There is so little information around on SL - thats why I asked the question.
Flipper.
-
- KVRian
- 1023 posts since 8 Apr, 2003 from Östersund
Cubase SL is based on the same engine as SX. The only difference is that some features are locked in the SL version to make up for the higher price of the SX version. There are also a few plugins missing and stuff like surround, frequency analyzer, audio file statistics and so on. However CPU usage and such should be similar in the SL and SX version, actually that goes for the SE and LE versions as well.
And no I didn't read through all of the posts but hey, maybe I said something useful eh?
/Majken
And no I didn't read through all of the posts but hey, maybe I said something useful eh?
/Majken
-
original flipper original flipper https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=8999
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 2544 posts since 14 Sep, 2003 from Essex
-
- KVRist
- 157 posts since 15 May, 2005
-
- KVRist
- 257 posts since 25 Apr, 2004
i think you got the answer quite some posts back, anyway this thread was about the forums not about your original question (you'd have gotten your answer much faster then).
if you are in for less clutter, try the cubase SE or LE (that is the OEM-name for SE). that is still based on SX 1 (which you might also try).
a freind of mine recently picked up sx1 and wanted to make the transition from reason. i was amazed at how easy and fast you get things done there. (i'm not in for a downgrade though)
if you are in for less clutter, try the cubase SE or LE (that is the OEM-name for SE). that is still based on SX 1 (which you might also try).
a freind of mine recently picked up sx1 and wanted to make the transition from reason. i was amazed at how easy and fast you get things done there. (i'm not in for a downgrade though)
You're my son, dude!
-
- KVRian
- 1325 posts since 6 Mar, 2001 from London, UK
As Jillie says, she is a Cubase SE user and has no USB Key number. After several exchanges, Numnuts, a regular here, actually gives her some help. As she is clearly a drowning Newbie, she needs kid gloves, not Steinberg’s daleks.CubaseNet wrote:Jillie wrote: hey guys ive got another bounce problem.
If i export my files i dont get my midi in it...
That means if i listen to my music, i only hear my audio not my midi.
Pls help again
Jilke
ps. i use Cubase SEChristian Dettner Administrative Moderator wrote:Hello,
All answers should be here:
http://forum.cubase.net/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=8773Jillie wrote: no, sorry but it isnt.
I can listen the midi in cubase but when i export the file to wav or something i lose he midi file and i only hear my audio files??Maincat wrote: Please view the following message:
http://forum.cubase.net/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=16415
Please store your Steinberg USB Key Number. This measure is for the benefit of us all.
Thanks
Cubase.net is controlled by a loose affiliation of Steinberg jobsworth fanatics and a smattering of unemployed wideboys, grubbing up some kind of income vampirizing Cubase user’s ignorance, which has rendered a once vital and dynamic forum into an emporium of shame. All the great and respect-worthy Steinberg supportes have all but given up posting. Steinberg’s thought police patrol even the Music Lounge expunging anything the least bit corporately distasteful. If the primary function of propaganda is to create an environment in which any utterance contrary to the ruling will is revealed as a jarring dissonance, Cubase.net is a fairyland of Steinberg’s own perfection.
The great transforming myth of Cubase.net was that the only thing wrong with the product went wrong in cracked copies. On this justification the very same apparatchiks who now dominate every aspect of the forum, began a lengthy campaign to lock out participants who didn’t have a dongle number. Having got their way, the train of abuse (in the absence of any crack of SX3 for the best part of nine months) did not abate, then the thought police methodology took over.
Cubase is no longer a music sequencer, it is a religion; only the worthy may prey. Cubase.net is no longer a support forum. It is a marketing tool of Steinberg. It is about as much use in helping Cubase users as is a one legged man at an arse kicking party.
At least it fixed all the bugs though, didn't it?
-
- Banned
- 1149 posts since 7 Mar, 2004
Man you can´t be serious, name anything perfect bug free, please.
I´m happy with SX, but you seem to hold a lot of ressentment, perhaps aside yourself no one reckon your greatness.
Why don´t you make a sequencer yourself and distribute it, now we all would be happy for sure,
I´m happy with SX, but you seem to hold a lot of ressentment, perhaps aside yourself no one reckon your greatness.
Why don´t you make a sequencer yourself and distribute it, now we all would be happy for sure,
-
- KVRian
- 1202 posts since 8 May, 2003 from Munich
stag I believe HanafiH's post was quite tongue in cheek and sarcastic in nature, just to make sure you're reading it how its meant to be read 
Cubase.net has become rather useless for support, a good while ago. I recon thats why irc and independent community sites boom for tech support on a whole range of products. After all who'd bring their car to a manufacturer's sales or PR departments for overhaul and repairs. You don't need some overworked frustrated person who doesn't actually drive the car in real life situations tell you 'oh that exhaust dragging along on the concrete is a feature, not a bug. And RTFM because this car is perfect anyhow, its a user error'.
Anyway, plenty cubase users around here, so just ask your questions in the hosts forum here. If you're lucky those having a bad hair day won't even ask you if you're using a pirated copy.
Markus
Cubase.net has become rather useless for support, a good while ago. I recon thats why irc and independent community sites boom for tech support on a whole range of products. After all who'd bring their car to a manufacturer's sales or PR departments for overhaul and repairs. You don't need some overworked frustrated person who doesn't actually drive the car in real life situations tell you 'oh that exhaust dragging along on the concrete is a feature, not a bug. And RTFM because this car is perfect anyhow, its a user error'.
Anyway, plenty cubase users around here, so just ask your questions in the hosts forum here. If you're lucky those having a bad hair day won't even ask you if you're using a pirated copy.
Markus