Jus had one of those DOH! moments too.....some nice demos above in mcnoone's post
Happy Musiking!
dsan
Yes, it's part of the bundle - basically, the internal FX of the Legacy Cell broken out into a general FX plugin you can use on other stuff.dsan@mail.com wrote:I guess technically MDX-E is not a "recreation" but it seems you can get it as part of the bundle listed in the op.
Given the second hand costs of all the gear, even the "less desirable" things such as the M1 / Wavestation, it's price is still good. I have a Wavestation here, and the Legacy software completely replaces it, despite the software sounding a little too good over the hardware - but the extra polyphony on the WS over the hardware is a godsend.dsan@mail.com wrote:Still, while it may well be the cat's meow in the eyes of the OP, at the list price, a bit too much - at this time.
Sure, but what you're not taking into account is money. Like my friend Cindy says, "it changes everything." I don't think Korg makes anything as a "labor of love." They're a company looking to make money. When they Released the MS20 Mini and the kit, they were looking at the market that DSI and Doepher created and they thought, "Oh, let's test the waters with a Monotron." When that did well, they jumped in. Not because they wanted to make us think they were a cool company, but they honestly saw money to be made.Chopper wrote: my point is that korg could do the same, considering their background; not trying to emulate a classic, but going towards creating the best synth they can, period.
of course, as for every other synth, ''best'' is very subjective...
You know the answer to that. Korg, Roland Yamaha, et al are hardware companies. Korg doesn't make any money off of 2nd hand M1's and Wavestations, so in effect they've been smartly double dipping on that front. But they're not going to give you latest and greatest korg technology outside of a workstation type hardware package. That just wouldn't make business sense (at this point).Chopper wrote:if they obviously have a team of people able to code various plugins, why oh why didn't they as well come up in the past ten years with something a bit more in line with today's needs and possibilities?
There are exceptions, but for the most part there is a correlation between modeling quality and CPU usage. Of course the legacy plugins don't tax a modern CPU, they're 10 years old.PatchAdamz wrote:Yea true, very good point.layzer wrote:nobody has mentioned the insanely low CPU use of the collection. so yeah, go with the so called "modern" analog emus that only produce a slightly better sound at a much higher CPU TAX, and most listeners won't even notice the difference.
Not finding those too now... i could have sworn they were available from korguser.net. I see they changed some stuff now on their shop site though, that's a shame.dsan@mail.com wrote: Unfortunately, I'm not finding any demos of the software at Korg, so will have to rely on the sound demos the guys here have graciously provided.
Submit: News, Plugins, Hosts & Apps | Advertise @ KVR | Developer Account | About KVR / Contact Us | Privacy Statement
© KVR Audio, Inc. 2000-2026