For instance, if you'd _listened_ to the example instead of reiterating your opinion ["the key cannot be determined without hearing chords" following <"Major V chord in the minor key" isn't relevant to the music presented. It doesn't happen in Dorian.>] some more again, now argumentatively, you could have found that the music presented isn't about chords. Or key (being modal).hersoot wrote:You are rude.jancivil wrote:le sigh. Is it your position that there is some chord in the actual example that would tell you where 'i' is? I'm doing something directly to the point and I'm sure it takes less time than consideration of your side issue 'chords' will result in. I don't know if there even are chords, I did not need there to be, to know what the 'tonic' is. No, the vertical consideration had no bearing at all in determining the tonic.hersoot wrote:But all music has notes that relate to one another in certain ways. The ear hears those relationships whether the notes are sounded individually or at the same time.
You could listen rather than keep talking.
I, generous with my time, provide the actual answer to the question... and you're impertinent.
