MeldaProduction

Svama · Post by **Svama** » Tue Oct 25, 2016 10:53 am

And what about the handles for q and dynamic Eq? These could be invisible and only visible in case of changing these.

DarkStar · Post by **DarkStar** » Tue Oct 25, 2016 12:25 pm

I can see some merit in (optionally?) being able to show those controls only for the band being edited (as in the second mock-up image), and none when they are no band is being edited (as in the third mock-up image).

>>> http://i.imgur.com/3bX2T4F.png

While editing the line guides should remain. When not editing they could be removed too

"Being edited" means that the mouse is clicked near one of the nodes

Svama · Post by **Svama** » Tue Oct 25, 2016 12:32 pm

Perfect, that´s what I mean. GUI optimization par excellence

Maybe a mouse hover over the node displays the handles of this node?
Could be the first little step, if possible and Vojtech likes it. Have some more ideas

MeldaProduction · Post by **MeldaProduction** » Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:12 am

No, sorry, that's a very bad move - one would need to first click on a band to be actually able to edit it. That's a workflow killer.

DarkStar · Post by **DarkStar** » Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:19 am

How about the controls and guidelines appearing when the mouse is "close to" a node? No need for any click, and "close to" can be decided by you.

Svama · Post by **Svama** » Wed Oct 26, 2016 10:13 am

There are many possibilities, first clicking to change parameters is not good, but like I already said and Dark Star also mentioned, hover over the node and the handles are there. For me it´s more a workflow killer to open the bands view first, because of changing parmters of nodes that are nearby each other and I can´t change the handle I like to change in the graph view. I´d prefer a workflow without the bands view.

MeldaProduction · Post by **MeldaProduction** » Sun Oct 30, 2016 10:17 am

Well, from my point of view - it rarely happens to have bands too close to each other, if so, then you are probably doing too much

. DarkStar's idea isn't ideal either, besides technical stuff I don't want to ellaborate, you'd actually need to first move to a band and then move the mouse along the handles so that it doesn't disappear... bleee... horrible

. No no, it will stay the way it is. In the extreme cases you just need to open the band settings, or used the band list below.

Svama · Post by **Svama** » Sun Oct 30, 2016 7:28 pm

Band settings and band list blow up the GUI in a useless way, no benefit, would be great to see a threshold there for dynamic equing and an input level for the different bands.

MeldaProduction · Post by **MeldaProduction** » Tue Nov 01, 2016 10:19 am

What do you mean by that??

Svama · Post by **Svama** » Mon Nov 14, 2016 10:36 am

By working with the little sonogram under the frequency graph the line under the node does much more sense than above!

.jon · Post by **.jon** » Mon Nov 14, 2016 12:29 pm

I don't see close bands ever a problem with the mousewheel zoom feature. They can be practically on top of each other at default/100% zoom, and perfectly adjustable with a flick of a finger.

Not like any eq adjustment at that precision actually mattered, but this EQ makes such minutely detailed twiddling possible anyway- a nice, educative pastime in the land of non-audible frequency tweaks!

Svama · Post by **Svama** » Thu Nov 17, 2016 10:40 am

Maybe it´s possible to add seeing the q value also by adjusting it by mousewheel?

.jon · Post by **.jon** » Thu Nov 17, 2016 2:29 pm

Click & hold on the node while using mousewheel to see the info/details box.

MeldaProduction · Post by **MeldaProduction** » Sun Nov 20, 2016 4:17 pm

.jon wrote:Click & hold on the node while using mousewheel to see the info/details box.

Yes! It's more accurate anyway.

MeldaProduction

KVR Audio

FR: Eq