Poll: New style, do you like it?
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 14339 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
Thanks for the feedback folks!
As for the metering - I quite hate the TDR, but I'll try anyways... but you know, if I won't like it...
As for the metering - I quite hate the TDR, but I'll try anyways... but you know, if I won't like it...
-
- KVRAF
- 10376 posts since 2 Sep, 2003 from Surrey, UK
-
- KVRAF
- 1871 posts since 17 May, 2005
I feel there's so much screen space wasted. The main thing that gets used the most, the EQ screen, is relatively small compared to everything.
The zoom bars are very narrow as well. But you use plenty of space for empty borders and GUI.
For example the top two rows, the knobs, that could be much smaller and occupy just 1 row. I don't think every knob needs so much screen real estate for text.
Below the EQ window, the Bands could be less big. So that the EQ window gets more room.
- KVRian
- 710 posts since 7 May, 2002 from Phoenix, Arizona, USA
I like this new style also, though I agree with the above post in that I prefer to save space at the top of MDynamicEQ by having lines instead of knobs:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- KVRAF
- 10376 posts since 2 Sep, 2003 from Surrey, UK
I just collapse the Bands panel and right-click the node on the EQ graph that I want to edit.zeep wrote:... Below the EQ window, the Bands could be less big. So that the EQ window gets more room.
But: a wild idea for Vojtech to consider - add a button to pop out the Bands panel into its own window?
-
MeldaProduction MeldaProduction https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=176122
- KVRAF
- Topic Starter
- 14339 posts since 15 Mar, 2008 from Czech republic
Ugh, that I'd rather avoid
.
-
- KVRAF
- 10376 posts since 2 Sep, 2003 from Surrey, UK
-
- KVRist
- 147 posts since 8 May, 2015
Proposing an idea:
So what do you think? Two rows can be made one. Everything's still readable very well -and big.
I would like this on the other plugins as well - can save lots of space this way with knobs.
(sorry for not perfectly adjusting)
So what do you think? Two rows can be made one. Everything's still readable very well -and big.
I would like this on the other plugins as well - can save lots of space this way with knobs.
(sorry for not perfectly adjusting)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-PC: Threadripper gen3 3200, 128Gig RAM, Windows 10/64bit, SDD HDs, RME UCX, Geforce GTX 1050Ti, Reason 12, Wavelab9, MTotalBundle, 2 Acer Touchscreens-
-
- KVRist
- 266 posts since 18 Oct, 2005
I agree, also about the space wasted just for a frame...ericzang wrote:I like this new style also, though I agree with the above post in that I prefer to save space at the top of MDynamicEQ by having lines instead of knobs:
::
Mads
-
- KVRAF
- 2053 posts since 13 May, 2004 from Germany
The aera right to the actual EQ is the most wasted space for me as it cannot be collapsed
-
- KVRist
- 161 posts since 22 Jun, 2014
HI
I hope these new styles don't break the Third Party SkyBlue theme. Please don't say you find people who buy third party themes interesting because I bought MXXX precisely because of the nice colours on and work this chap put in on his theme for Melda.
http://www.satyatunes.com/web/skyblue.php
Thanks
I hope these new styles don't break the Third Party SkyBlue theme. Please don't say you find people who buy third party themes interesting because I bought MXXX precisely because of the nice colours on and work this chap put in on his theme for Melda.
http://www.satyatunes.com/web/skyblue.php
Thanks

