CPU meter in Studio One shows the highest stressed core at any given moment. So if one core is running a huge Diva patch with long releases and is using 80% of a single core, and the rest of your cores are literally running nothing...Studio One will show 80% on the performance meter. So you regularly see comments like, "OMG Studio One uses so much more CPU than Reaper! 80% in Studio One compared to 5% in Reaper running the same patch." I mean yeah...Reaper is much more efficient at balancing CPU and running large projects, but the difference in these single-instance tests isn't anywhere near as large as the Studio One performance meter makes it seem at first.blakflag wrote: Thu Oct 29, 2020 10:02 am The "CPU meter" in Studio One at least seems somewhat arbitrary, like its trying to represent how close you are to glitching depending on both total usage on all cores + the maximum usage on any core.. not sure, though.
i9 10900k brand new Built...u-He Crushes It
-
Funkybot's Evil Twin Funkybot's Evil Twin https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=116627
- KVRAF
- 12489 posts since 16 Aug, 2006
-
- KVRist
- 89 posts since 5 Aug, 2010
Basari if you test this.
HWmonitor and open it, if only using one channel with diva and your acoustica plugins, and not using multicore support, does your 1 core go up to 5.3(turbo) and what does your DAW cpu meter show then?
IF you then add more tracks with dina and acoustica, how high does the turbo go on the other cores.
The 10900k is very easy to overclock to over 5GHz on all cores from what i hear. This would probably give you an edge......... i am curious since i want to test this CPU myself.
Best regards Christer
HWmonitor and open it, if only using one channel with diva and your acoustica plugins, and not using multicore support, does your 1 core go up to 5.3(turbo) and what does your DAW cpu meter show then?
IF you then add more tracks with dina and acoustica, how high does the turbo go on the other cores.
The 10900k is very easy to overclock to over 5GHz on all cores from what i hear. This would probably give you an edge......... i am curious since i want to test this CPU myself.
Best regards Christer
- KVRAF
- 4197 posts since 23 May, 2004 from Bad Vilbel, Germany
Stack = 1, right?
-
- Banned
- 252 posts since 14 Oct, 2020
Yes 1
-
david.beholder david.beholder https://www.kvraudio.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=159839
- KVRAF
- 1914 posts since 13 Sep, 2007
What is the topic exactly about?
DAWs can't handle multithread correctly?
Plugin x vs Diva rule of thumb performance?
Or some person with deskop can't run more Diva instances than I can my laptop?
DAWs can't handle multithread correctly?
Plugin x vs Diva rule of thumb performance?
Or some person with deskop can't run more Diva instances than I can my laptop?
Murderous duck!
- KVRAF
- 24442 posts since 7 Jan, 2009 from Croatia
The topic is that 10900K shouldn't perform that poorly. 
- KVRian
- 1112 posts since 26 Jun, 2008 from Czech Republic
Noob question: Have you checked DPC latency performance? Some graphics drivers can mess with audio performance a lot, when misbehaving. ...and because some DAWs calculate CPU utulization based on routine-execution times, it can show up as high CPU usage as well.
Evovled into noctucat...
http://www.noctucat.com/
http://www.noctucat.com/
