Two questions for RC 6 already

[lovemusic15]

lovemusic15 , we are on the same wavelength !

Yes lulukom,

I totally agree with you. I've seen many of your comments in the forum, and it’s clear we share the same producer mindset when it comes to getting RC software to work as a co-pilot—helping us create the music we want rather than dealing with the randomness that most software tends to offer.

The ability to tailor the software to fit each producer’s unique style is key. Having a starting point that’s closer to what we’re aiming for saves us from spending hours trying to get there. A software that understands your style and delivers results you actually want to hear can really boost creativity.

As producers, it’s easy to fall into repeating the same ideas and concepts. But a tool that learns what you like will always push you forward. My goal is to get RC to a level similar to Spotify’s recommendation system—where it understands your musical preferences and suggests new music you might enjoy.

In the same way, I want RC to start creating melodies and riffs based on the inputs you provide, and then suggest new combinations and styles by blending all those elements. This would make the creative process much more dynamic and inspiring.

[BluGenes]

And a no cost to other intellectual ideas! Yea, using other software ideas in this isn't at all unethical. I suppose if you are that in capable of creating your own musical ideas you need that kind of help, then that justifies the process. I am really starting to not like "click create" style music. I guess I just appreciate the callus's on my finger tips now. But, if that is what you need, then so be it. I accept that you can't do it, write your own.

[lulukom]

It's quite unpleasant to read posts where you're told which music technologies you should use. Or that someone likes Windows and criticizes Mac OS, or vice versa. What's all this for? We all operate according to the same principle here: we write what each of us would like to get from the program we use, and in turn, Attila decides what that program will become. There are no other options. This is simply an expression of purely individual wishes. And let's be tolerant of each other. This is simply freedom of choice in what to post here. If you like a post, support it. If you don't like it, provide compelling arguments against it.

[lovemusic15]

And a no cost to other intellectual ideas! Yea, using other software ideas in this isn't at all unethical. I suppose if you are that in capable of creating your own musical ideas you need that kind of help, then that justifies the process. I am really starting to not like "click create" style music. I guess I just appreciate the callus's on my finger tips now. But, if that is what you need, then so be it. I accept that you can't do it, write your own.

Mr.BluGene

I’m honestly confused—if you’re so hands-on and make everything from the ground up, why are you even here? Why are you using this software? In your videos, you’re using RC generators and VSTs to create your orchestra or folk music, or whatever you label it as. The fact that you have the audacity to tell me what I can and can’t do is an absolute joke.

Let me break down your comment and show you just how out of touch it sounds. It’s not in my nature to criticize people’s music or style, but if you want to question my capabilities, maybe take a look at your SoundCloud—the numbers speak for themselves. I don’t come online to self-promote my music, but if I did, and showed you the work I’ve produced and collaborated on with major labels and artists—the kind of numbers those posts get within an hour—you’d be laughed out of the park.

My job is to make music that works for my clients—not all the music I create is for myself, but I respect creativity in all its forms. I’m not some retired old man with endless time to learn every genre by hand. If I can use software that speeds up my workflow, why wouldn’t I? So trust me, if you try to get personal with me, think twice—you really don’t want to go down that road because I’ll have a field day discussing production and music with you.

Regarding your “no cost to other intellectual ideas” point—innovation builds on existing tools and concepts. Using software ideas or assistance isn’t unethical; it’s how modern music is made.

And about your “calluses on your fingertips” comment—respect for traditional musicianship is valid, but creativity comes in many forms. Whether you play every note yourself or use tools to inspire, the goal is making music that connects.

Don’t get me started on this “one-click” mentality. Whether it takes one click or ten, it won’t produce a finished track. The user still has to decide what makes a good melody, find the right sounds, mix, master—things any producer knows well. Inspiration can start anywhere, but making music takes real work.

Many new users here appreciate the official YouTube channel dedicated to this software—it helps them learn features and grow. I don’t see you discouraging those who ask for help or use the software.

This forum exists to improve the software by gathering ideas from users so more people buy it and can learn from tutorials and shared knowledge. Next time you want to post, keep it about the suggestion—not personal attacks. When multiple people back a suggestion, it’s clear your response isn’t helpful and only holds this community back.

So before you try to tell me or others what they’re capable of or how they should make music—think again.

[heliacal]

In the same way, I want RC to start creating melodies and riffs based on the inputs you provide, and then suggest new combinations and styles by blending all those elements. This would make the creative process much more dynamic and inspiring.

Software will NEVER be able to channel the human, flesh & blood cellular emotional experience which is what music is. Will it be able to generate non-emotional, plagiarized background junk food garbage, sure.

Take a band like Bring Me The Horizon. Think software could come up with and/or match anything close to that emotional trajectory? NEVER!

Led Zeppelin had very little tech, yet came up with the most creative, expressive music ever. What you are advocating is that machines are superior to human creativity, which is a dead end, literally.

Be careful what you wish for...

[heliacal]

A human player that flows with music will NEVER come through software. Learn to play kidz!