It's getting better and better! - and all the features that are already there are implemented in such a mature way!stefancrs wrote:so, how do you currently feel about Podium?
Better Handling of Audio Files and References needed
-
- KVRAF
- 25049 posts since 12 Jul, 2003 from West Caprazumia
-
- KVRAF
- 3364 posts since 16 Feb, 2004 from atop a katamari
ttoz where will you get the files from? it's only an issue if you've opened an archive, because otherwise it DOES show the filenames in the description, doesn't it? and if they're from an opened archive you can just open the folder directly and they WILL be there. you don't need to check that they're there, they're just there and you can do what the hell you want with them, heck, moreso than you can otherwise because you have direct OS control over the files, including opening them directly in whatever other program you want for the task in hand.
seriously what is your problem?
seriously what is your problem?
Kick, punch, it's all in the mind.
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- KVRAF
- 10815 posts since 26 Nov, 2004 from UK
a rename of the thread should do it!IIRs wrote:Anyone else think this thread needs deleting?
but if he wont chainge the FALSE! slanderious title of this thread then we can give the mod's permishion to kill it
-
- KVRAF
- 1600 posts since 1 Apr, 2003 from Seattle, WA
Well I don't really think that is the best implementation (no need for another list when you already have one) but I understand what you are asking for.
Ben
Ben
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- KVRAF
- 3364 posts since 16 Feb, 2004 from atop a katamari
that's the way to do it. it'd be handy for you indeed if it just had an extra tab of info in the list that showed the ACTUAL filename.
but seriously ttoz tell me what you would do with that filename info. would you load another program and then navigate to that folder to get the file? there IS a button that opens that exact folder for you, with all the files in, all there, in that folder (heck it's got the pathname at the top of the window if you need to recite it to yourself while you work) and you can do what you like with the files there - open them, delete them, rename them all so that they show exactly the the filepath is in the filename, transfer them to your mac, open them simultaneously in logic,cubase,podium and whatever other hosts you have just to bash. or heck even put them on ebay or the kvr marketplace along with the rest of your software. or post a screenshot of the folder telling everyone how furious you are.
but seriously ttoz tell me what you would do with that filename info. would you load another program and then navigate to that folder to get the file? there IS a button that opens that exact folder for you, with all the files in, all there, in that folder (heck it's got the pathname at the top of the window if you need to recite it to yourself while you work) and you can do what you like with the files there - open them, delete them, rename them all so that they show exactly the the filepath is in the filename, transfer them to your mac, open them simultaneously in logic,cubase,podium and whatever other hosts you have just to bash. or heck even put them on ebay or the kvr marketplace along with the rest of your software. or post a screenshot of the folder telling everyone how furious you are.
Kick, punch, it's all in the mind.
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
-
- KVRAF
- 1600 posts since 1 Apr, 2003 from Seattle, WA
That's exactly what I was talking about. Why make a new window when you already have one. And yes I have used other software, thanks for asking.ttoz wrote:Yes but the descriptions in the list are based on initial imports.Beno wrote:Well I don't really think that is the best implementation (no need for another list when you already have one) but I understand what you are asking for.
Ben
An audio pool with file location descriptions is common.
Have you used other software?
Ok, how about THIS as an idea.
Just one extra column, with the heading "file location", in the same list we are using now.
Would ANYONE have an objection to that?
Ben
-
- KVRAF
- 4738 posts since 20 Feb, 2004 from Gothenburg, Sweden
If you told Frits about this he would probably implement it really fast, seems kinda like a one hour task really.ttoz wrote:Podium is simply a no go cause it lacks the most crucial feature...telling you where you release clips when dragging on the timeline.stefancrs wrote:so, how do you currently feel about Podium?
I din't go further than that.
Stefan H Singer
https://dropshotaudio.com/
https://dropshotaudio.com/
-
- Banned
- Topic Starter
- 22457 posts since 5 Sep, 2001
[DELETED]
-
- The Teach
- 8273 posts since 23 Jul, 2002 from flatness
theres an easy way to sort that tozza ...ttoz wrote:i guess I just want everything to be like Logic.
slainte
rob-
- KVRAF
- 10815 posts since 26 Nov, 2004 from UK
no problems from mettoz wrote:Yes but the descriptions in the list are based on initial imports.Beno wrote:Well I don't really think that is the best implementation (no need for another list when you already have one) but I understand what you are asking for.
Ben
An audio pool with file location descriptions is common.
Have you used other software?
Ok, how about THIS as an idea.
Just one extra column, with the heading "file location", in the same list we are using now.
Would ANYONE have an objection to that?
why not arkive your edit then reopen it, it will put all waves in 1 folder & refrence them wont it?
Subz