Oh, heck. LOL.bduffy wrote:No. This is Year Zero. All previous music is cold and digital.kmonkey wrote:
Didn't people already created awesome music when these mojo plugins where not existed?
Sonimus Satson (Console emulation) ready to buy now :)
-
- KVRian
- 1305 posts since 30 Jan, 2004
-
- KVRian
- 1439 posts since 25 Nov, 2008 from Seattle, WA
I think I know exactly what the problem is and it's not actually satson, but a trick inwas trying to make the chorus sound bigger--automating the gain into th limiter and increasing it for the chorus. I guess I overdid it 
Let me do an update tonight.
Let me do an update tonight.
-
- KVRist
- 443 posts since 20 Nov, 2010 from stuck in transition
you have my permission. Ok go...aircargo wrote:Let me do an update tonight.
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
Now hold on; I didn't authorize this.kcisANDderit wrote:you have my permission. Ok go...aircargo wrote:Let me do an update tonight.
-
- KVRAF
- 1870 posts since 17 May, 2005
Anxiously waiting for Satson 1.1
I'm impatient!
Have used Satson on each project since i bought it. Though i hardly ever use "FAT" mode because it takes too much away from the dynamic range. I make house/dance music btw.
Have used Satson on each project since i bought it. Though i hardly ever use "FAT" mode because it takes too much away from the dynamic range. I make house/dance music btw.
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
-
- KVRist
- 443 posts since 20 Nov, 2010 from stuck in transition
really? I don't hear that so, can you actually see that in an rms meter or TT Dynamic Range Meter?zeep wrote: i hardly ever use "FAT" mode because it takes too much away from the dynamic range
-
- KVRist
- 443 posts since 20 Nov, 2010 from stuck in transition
yeah, seems like we have to go to gearslutz for the most upto date info from the dev (nick: pylorca). the main Satson thread there moved into the "older than 2 months" sectionsonicpowa wrote:Yup, but not until July 23.bduffy wrote:Is there supposed to be a 1.1?
-
- KVRian
- 1439 posts since 25 Nov, 2008 from Seattle, WA
- KVRAF
- 19156 posts since 13 Feb, 2003 from Vancouver, Canada
Any news on the update features?sonicpowa wrote:Yup, but not until July 23.bduffy wrote:Is there supposed to be a 1.1?
- KVRAF
- 2177 posts since 12 Nov, 2009
Is there a 64 bit version already?
Finally!
-
- KVRAF
- 1800 posts since 10 Feb, 2007
Yes, there is.cyphersuit wrote:Is there a 64 bit version already?
-
- KVRAF
- 2448 posts since 12 Sep, 2004
Yeah, I don't hear that either, at least on my stuff. Sometimes FAT is too... er... fat... so I don't use it, but IMO it works very well on lots of things, that's for sure. Adds some beefy glue to vocals, drums, etc. Maybe turn the gain knob down a smidge?kcisANDderit wrote:really? I don't hear that so, can you actually see that in an rms meter or TT Dynamic Range Meter?zeep wrote: i hardly ever use "FAT" mode because it takes too much away from the dynamic range
